| Literature DB >> 35302994 |
Kwang Hwan Park1, Jae Han Park1, Yeo Kwon Yoon1, Jai Bum Kwon2, Jung Hwan Kim1, Eunju Lee3, Yunho Roh3, Seung Hwan Han1, Jin Woo Lee1.
Abstract
The incidence of achilles tendon rupture varies by gender, age, and seasonal variation. However, there has been no study as yet linking achilles tendon rupture to daily fluctuations in outdoor temperature. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between outdoor temperature and achilles tendon rupture using a Korea Meteorological Administration database and a Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database. Between 2002 and 2015, all instances of achilles tendon repair were retrieved from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database to examine sociodemographic factors, specifically sex, age, residential area, and income level. Minimum age requirement was 20 years. Outdoor temperatures recorded at 16 observation points in South Korea were also acquired from the Korea Meteorological Administration data center for analysis. Overall, 850 (0.119%) of 713,456 individuals in the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database underwent achilles tendon repair between 2002 and 2015. Yearly procedural totals increased with advancing age, peaking at ages 30-39 years (14.6 per 100,000 persons) and declining thereafter. Minimum, median, and maximum outdoor temperatures were associated with achilles tendon repair (p<0.05), as did household income. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, outdoor temperatures, sex, age, and household income emerged as factors significantly associated with achilles tendon repair. Outcomes of this study confirm an association between incidence of achilles tendon repair and outdoor temperature, the latter denoting a novel index and likely surrogate measure of vigorous physical activity afforded by warmer weather.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35302994 PMCID: PMC8932609 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Incidence of achilles tendon repair per 100,000 person-years, listed annually.
| Men + Women | Men | Women | Male-to-female ratio | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Person-years | No. | Incidence | Person-years | No. | Incidence | Person-years | No. | Incidence | |
| 2002 | 520,050 | 27 | 5.2 | 229,032 | 22 | 9.6 | 291,018 | 5 | 1.7 | 5.6 |
| 2003 | 540,742 | 35 | 6.5 | 239,801 | 24 | 10.0 | 300,941 | 11 | 3.7 | 2.7 |
| 2004 | 570,218 | 46 | 8.1 | 257,238 | 35 | 13.6 | 312,980 | 11 | 3.5 | 3.9 |
| 2005 | 611,441 | 38 | 6.2 | 278,186 | 28 | 10.1 | 333,255 | 10 | 3.0 | 3.4 |
| 2006 | 637,080 | 63 | 9.9 | 292,335 | 47 | 16.1 | 344,745 | 16 | 4.6 | 3.5 |
| 2007 | 651,807 | 44 | 6.8 | 300,166 | 34 | 11.3 | 351,641 | 10 | 2.8 | 4.0 |
| 2008 | 664,562 | 65 | 9.8 | 307,195 | 56 | 18.2 | 357,367 | 9 | 2.5 | 7.2 |
| 2009 | 683,236 | 57 | 8.3 | 317,597 | 41 | 12.9 | 365,639 | 16 | 4.4 | 3.0 |
| 2010 | 693,610 | 77 | 11.1 | 323,005 | 59 | 18.3 | 370,605 | 18 | 4.9 | 3.8 |
| 2011 | 704,502 | 52 | 7.4 | 328,711 | 45 | 13.7 | 375,791 | 7 | 1.9 | 7.3 |
| 2012 | 718,648 | 73 | 10.2 | 336,763 | 55 | 16.3 | 381,885 | 18 | 4.7 | 3.5 |
| 2013 | 727,353 | 90 | 12.4 | 341,641 | 70 | 20.5 | 385,712 | 20 | 5.2 | 4.0 |
| 2014 | 740,759 | 91 | 12.3 | 349,085 | 69 | 19.8 | 391,674 | 22 | 5.6 | 3.5 |
| 2015 | 748,312 | 92 | 12.3 | 353,247 | 68 | 19.2 | 395,065 | 24 | 6.1 | 3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No., Number of ATR.
Fig 1Incidence of achilles tendon repair (ATR) per 100,000 person-years plotted annually (2002–2015) and by age group.
(A) incidence of ATR increased yearly, men surpassing women during the study period. (B) incidence of ATR peaked at 30–39 years, gradually declining thereafter.
Incidence of achilles tendon repair per 100,000 person-years, grouped by age.
| Men + Women | Men | Women | Male-to-female ratio | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group | Person-years | No. | Incidence | Person-years | No. | Incidence | Person-years | No. | Incidence | |
| 20–29 | 1,621,246 | 100 | 6.2 | 744,033 | 79 | 10.6 | 877,213 | 21 | 2.4 | 4.4 |
| 30–39 | 1,995,308 | 291 | 14.6 | 933,571 | 231 | 24.7 | 1,061,737 | 60 | 5.7 | 4.4 |
| 40–49 | 2,045,594 | 266 | 13.0 | 979,545 | 212 | 21.6 | 1,066,049 | 54 | 5.1 | 4.3 |
| 50–59 | 1,640,504 | 133 | 0.8 | 784,364 | 91 | 11.6 | 856,140 | 42 | 4.9 | 2.4 |
| 60–69 | 1,079,408 | 43 | 4.0 | 498,973 | 29 | 5.8 | 580,435 | 14 | 2.4 | 2.4 |
| 70–79 | 646,809 | 14 | 2.2 | 257,650 | 9 | 3.5 | 389,159 | 5 | 1.3 | 2.7 |
| ≥80 | 183,451 | 3 | 1.6 | 55,866 | 2 | 3.6 | 127,585 | 1 | 0.8 | 4.6 |
No., Number of ATR.
Comparative analysis of outdoor temperatures in achilles tendon repair group and randomly selected controls (2002–2015).
| ATR (n = 850) | Control (n = 3400) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Median temperature, °C | 17.4 (9.1–22.6)** | 14 (4.6–21.8)** |
|
| Quantile of median temperature, °C |
| ||
| Q1 (≤5.3) | 134 (15.76)* | 933 (27.44)* | |
| Q2 (>5.3, ≤14.9) | 214 (25.18)* | 844 (24.82)* | |
| Q3 (>14.9, ≤22.0) | 263 (30.94)* | 805 (23.68)* | |
| Q4 (>22.0) | 239 (28.12)* | 818 (24.06)* | |
| Minimum temperature, °C | 12.7 (4.3–19.2)** | 9.5 (0.4–18.1)** |
|
| Maximum temperature, °C | 22.5 (14.2–27.5)** | 19.3 (9.4–26.4)** |
|
| Daily temperature range, °C | 8.6 (6.5–11.1)** | 8.8 (6.5–11)** | 0.576 |
| Latitude of residence area, n | 0.890 | ||
| High latitude (37–38) | 410 (48.24)* | 1649 (48.5)* | |
| Low latitude (33–36) | 440 (51.76)* | 1751 (51.5)* | |
| Household income, percentile |
| ||
| Low (<30) | 126 (15.38)* | 710 (22.44)* | |
| Intermediate (30–70) | 285 (34.80)* | 1202 (37.99)* | |
| High (≥70) | 408 (49.82)* | 1252 (39.57)* |
ATR, achilles tendon repair. Control group members randomly selected from National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort, proportional to yearly ATR group total. Data expressed as numerical values (%)* or median temperature (Q1,Q3)** unless otherwise specified, boldface indicating statistical significance (p < .05).
Fig 2Distribution of temperature index in control group and achilles tendon repair group (2002–2015).
(A-C) significant upward shifts in distributions of (A) median, (B) minimum, and (C) maximum temperatures of ATR group, compared with controls; (D) no significant difference in daily temperature ranges of ATR and control groups.
Fig 3Monthly distribution of occurrences in control and Achilles tendon repair (ATR) groups (2002–2015).
Incidence of ATR peaks in May, fewer injuries occurring in December and January.
Logistic regression analyses of factors associated with achilles tendon repair.
| Univariable | Multivariable 1 | Multivariable 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Median temperature, °C | 1.03 (1.02–1.04) | < .05 | - | - | 1.03 (1.02–1.04) |
|
| Quantile of median temperature, °C | < .05 | - | - | |||
| Q1 (≤5.3) | ref | ref | - | - | ||
| Q2 (>5.3, ≤14.85) | 1.77 (1.4–2.23) | < .05 | 1.70 (1.31–2.21) |
| - | - |
| Q3 (>14.85, ≤22) | 2.28 (1.81–2.86) | < .05 | 2.35 (1.82–3.03) |
| - | - |
| Q4 (>22) | 2.03 (1.61–2.56) | < .05 | 2.14 (1.65–2.77) |
| - | - |
| Male sex | 4.41 (3.71–5.24) | < .05 | 4.24 (3.52–5.11) |
| 4.26 (3.54–5.14) |
|
| Age | 0.95 (0.94–0.96) | < .05 | 0.95 (0.94–0.95) |
| 0.95 (0.94–0.95) |
|
| Income level (percentile) | < .05 | |||||
| Low (<30) | ref | ref | ref | |||
| Intermediate (30–70) | 1.34 (1.06–1.68) |
| 1.21 (0.94–1.55) | 0.135 | 1.22 (0.95–1.57) | 0.112 |
| High (≥70) | 1.84 (1.47–2.29) | < .05 | 1.97 (1.54–2.51) |
| 1.99 (1.56–2.54) |
|
| Regional latitude | ||||||
| High (37–38 degrees) | ref | - | - | - | - | |
| Low (33–36 degrees) | 1.01 (0.87–1.18) | 0.890 | - | - | - | - |
Boldface indicates statistical significance (p < .05), CI, confidence interval.