Literature DB >> 3529927

Evaluation of the modified Chlamydiazyme immunoassay for the detection of chlamydial antigen.

R A Levy, A L Warford.   

Abstract

The modified Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was compared with McCoy cell culture with 336 paired genital swabs collected from patients attending gynecology and urgent care clinics and transported to the regional laboratory for testing. Of the 299 female and 37 male genital specimens, 47 (15.7%) cervical and 14 (37.8%) urethral specimens were positive. All 60 specimens positive for Chlamydia trachomatis also were EIA reactive (sensitivity, 100%). The specificity was 91.3%, with 24 paired swab specimens positive by EIA only. A number of factors may have contributed some culture false negatives, as 91.7% of the EIA only positive patients were symptomatic. The reproducibility of the EIA method was evaluated with different washing technics. The Chlamydiazyme EIA was found to be a cost-effective, rapid, and sensitive test for detection of chlamydial antigen in genital specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3529927     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/86.3.330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  11 in total

1.  Ortho enzyme immunoassay versus McCoy cell monolayers stained by iodine or fluorescent antibody for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L E Phillips; P B Smith; G D Riddle; S Faro; H K Goodrich; M G Martens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Limitations of Chlamydiazyme in general hospital laboratories.

Authors:  S M Chisholm; B A Matheson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Evaluation of a commercial monoclonal antibody for detection of adenovirus antigen.

Authors:  M J August; A L Warford
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of nucleic acid hybridization with enzyme immunoassay and isolation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  H Tuokko; P Ruuska; T Hyypiä
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S S Hipp; Y Han; D Murphy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Effect of patient characteristics on performance of an enzyme immunoassay for detecting cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  L S Magder; K C Klontz; L H Bush; R C Barnes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of three non-culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital tract specimens.

Authors:  C J Hall; C Nelder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  M Bäckman; A K Rudén; O Ringertz; E G Sanström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.