Literature DB >> 35297020

Circling around number: People can accurately extract numeric values from circle area ratios.

Dana L Chesney1, Percival G Matthews2.   

Abstract

It has long been known that people have the ability to estimate numerical quantities without counting. A standard account is that people develop a sense of the size of symbolic numbers by learning to map symbolic numbers (e.g., 6) to their corresponding numerosities (e.g. :::) and concomitant approximate magnitude system (ANS) representations. However, we here demonstrate that adults are capable of extracting fractional numerical quantities from non-symbolic visual ratios (i.e., labeling a ratio of two circle areas with the appropriate symbolic fraction). Not only were adult participants able to perform this task, but they were remarkably accurate: linear regressions on median estimates yielded slopes near 1, and accounted for 97% of the variability. Participants also performed at least as well on line-estimation and ratio-estimation tasks using non-numeric circular stimuli as they did in earlier experiments using non-symbolic numerosities, which are frequently considered to be numeric stimuli. We discuss results as consistent with accounts suggesting that non-symbolic ratios have the potential to act as a reliable and stable ground for symbolic number, even when composed of non-numeric stimuli.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Approximate number system; Estimation; Number lines; Ratio processing system; Ratios; Symbolic number mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35297020     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02068-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

1.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Understanding bias in proportion production.

Authors:  J G Hollands; Takeshi Tanaka; Brian P Dyre
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Relating magnitudes: the brain's code for proportions.

Authors:  Simon N Jacob; Daniela Vallentin; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Calibrating the mental number line.

Authors:  Véronique Izard; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-08-02

5.  Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation.

Authors:  Julie L Booth; Robert S Siegler
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2006-01

6.  Spontaneous, modality-general abstraction of a ratio scale.

Authors:  Cory D Bonn; Jessica F Cantlon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-08-12

Review 7.  Core systems of number.

Authors:  Lisa Feigenson; Stanislas Dehaene; Elizabeth Spelke
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Tuning to non-symbolic proportions in the human frontoparietal cortex.

Authors:  Simon N Jacob; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Estimating large numbers.

Authors:  David Landy; Noah Silbert; Aleah Goldin
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-03-05

10.  Symbolic fractions elicit an analog magnitude representation in school-age children.

Authors:  Priya B Kalra; John V Binzak; Percival G Matthews; Edward M Hubbard
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2020-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.