| Literature DB >> 35296748 |
Mifuka Ouchi1, Takeya Kitta2, Hiroki Chiba1, Madoka Higuchi1, Mio Togo1, Yui Abe-Takahashi1, Nobuo Shinohara1.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative condition caused by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. As activation of dopaminergic receptors is fundamentally involved in the micturition reflex in PD, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of a single dose of rotigotine ([-]2-(N-propyl-N-2-thienylethylamino)-5-hydroxytetralin) on intercontraction interval (ICI) and voiding pressure (VP) in a rat model of PD. We used 27 female rats, PD was induced by injecting 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA; 8 μg in 2 μL of 0.9% saline containing 0.3% ascorbic acid), and rotigotine was administrated at doses of 0.125, 0.25, or 0.5 mg/kg, either intravenous or subcutaneous injection. In rats with 6-OHDA-induced PD, intravenous injection of 0.25 or 0.5 mg/kg rotigotine led to a significantly lower ICI than after vehicle injection (p < 0.05). Additionally, VP was significantly lower in animals administered rotigotine compared to those injected with vehicle (p < 0.05). Compared to vehicle-injected animals, subcutaneous administration of rotigotine (0.125, 0.25, or 0.5 mg/kg) led to a significantly higher ICI at 2 h after injection (p < 0.05); however, there was no change in ICI after injection with (+)-SCH23390 hydrochloride. Dermal administration of rotigotine in a rat model of PD could suppress an overactive bladder.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35296748 PMCID: PMC8927603 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08612-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Intravenous administration of rotigotine in Parkinson’s disease model.
| Dose of injection (mg/kg) | Inter contraction interval | |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle (n = 3) | 12 min 11 s ± 2 min 40 s | |
| 0.125 (n = 3) | 3 min 40 s ± 0 min 36 s | 0.08 |
| 0.25 (n = 3) | 1 min 35 s ± 0 min 8 s* | 0.018 |
| 0.5 (n = 3) | 1 min 29 s ± 0 min 16 s* | 0.029 |
(A) Intercontraction interval (n = 3), (B) Voiding pressure (cmH2O) (n = 3).
*Significant difference versus vehicle (p < 0.05). Data are shown as mean ± SE.
Subcutaneous administration of rotigotine in Parkinson’s disease model.
| Dose of injection | Vehicle | 1 h after rotigotine injection | 2 h after rotigotine injection |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.125 mg/kg (n = 7) | 9 min 58 s ± 1 min 51 s | 13 min 7 s ± 1 min 51 s* | 12 min 7 s ± 2 min 00 s* |
| 0.25 mg/kg (n = 8) | 9 min 41 s ± 1 min 20 s | 8 min 22 s ± 1 min 38 s | 10 min 15 s ± 2 min 35 s*† |
| 0.5 mg/kg (n = 9) | 9 min 30 s ± 2 min 3 s | 10 min 18 s ± 2 min 4 s | 12 min 15 s ± 2 min 19 s*† |
(A) Inter-contraction interval (minutes), (B) Voiding pressure (cmH2O), (C) Subcutaneous administration of rotigotine and D1 antagonist injection in Parkinson’s disease model.
*Significant difference versus vehicle (p < 0.05).
†Significant difference versus 1 h after rotigotine injection. Data are shown as mean ± SE.
Figure 1Data collection following intravenous and subcutaneous administration in Parkinson’s disease rats.
Figure 2(A) Intravenous administration of rotigotine. (B) Subcutaneous administration of rotigotine. (C) Cystometory trace for subcutaneous rotigotine treatment with or without SCH23390.