BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rotigotine acts as a dopamine receptor agonist with high affinity for the dopamine D2, D3, D4 and D5 receptors but with a low affinity for the dopamine D1 receptor. We have investigated this further in radioligand binding and functional studies and compared the profile of rotigotine with that of other drugs used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The binding of rotigotine to human dopamine D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 receptors was determined in radioligand binding studies using [(3)H]rotigotine and compared with that of standard antagonist radioligands. Functional interactions of rotigotine with human dopamine receptors was also determined. KEY RESULTS: [(3)H]rotigotine can be used as an agonist radioligand to label all dopamine receptor subtypes and this can be important to derive agonist affinity estimates. Rotigotine maintains this high affinity in functional studies at all dopamine receptors especially D1, D2 and D3 receptors and, to a lesser extent, D4 and D5 receptors. Rotigotine, like apomorphine but unlike ropinirole and pramipexole, was a potent agonist at all dopamine receptors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Rotigotine is a high-potency agonist at human dopamine D1, D2 and D3 receptors with a lower potency at D4 and D5 receptors. These studies differentiate rotigotine from conventional dopamine D2 agonists, used in the treatment of PD, such as ropinirole and pramipexole which lack activity at the D1 and D5 receptors, but resembles that of apomorphine which has greater efficacy in PD than other dopamine agonists but has suboptimal pharmacokinetic properties.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Rotigotine acts as a dopamine receptor agonist with high affinity for the dopamine D2, D3, D4 and D5 receptors but with a low affinity for the dopamine D1 receptor. We have investigated this further in radioligand binding and functional studies and compared the profile of rotigotine with that of other drugs used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The binding of rotigotine to humandopamine D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 receptors was determined in radioligand binding studies using [(3)H]rotigotine and compared with that of standard antagonist radioligands. Functional interactions of rotigotine with humandopamine receptors was also determined. KEY RESULTS:[(3)H]rotigotine can be used as an agonist radioligand to label all dopamine receptor subtypes and this can be important to derive agonist affinity estimates. Rotigotine maintains this high affinity in functional studies at all dopamine receptors especially D1, D2 and D3 receptors and, to a lesser extent, D4 and D5 receptors. Rotigotine, like apomorphine but unlike ropinirole and pramipexole, was a potent agonist at all dopamine receptors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Rotigotine is a high-potency agonist at humandopamine D1, D2 and D3 receptors with a lower potency at D4 and D5 receptors. These studies differentiate rotigotine from conventional dopamine D2 agonists, used in the treatment of PD, such as ropinirole and pramipexole which lack activity at the D1 and D5 receptors, but resembles that of apomorphine which has greater efficacy in PD than other dopamine agonists but has suboptimal pharmacokinetic properties.
Authors: Matthew F Peters; François Vaillancourt; Madeleine Heroux; Manon Valiquette; Clay W Scott Journal: Assay Drug Dev Technol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.738
Authors: C Reavill; S G Taylor; M D Wood; T Ashmeade; N E Austin; K Y Avenell; I Boyfield; C L Branch; J Cilia; M C Coldwell; M S Hadley; A J Hunter; P Jeffrey; F Jewitt; C N Johnson; D N Jones; A D Medhurst; D N Middlemiss; D J Nash; G J Riley; C Routledge; G Stemp; K M Thewlis; B Trail; A K Vong; J J Hagan Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Stephen P H Alexander; O Peter Buneman; Anthony P Davenport; John C McGrath; John A Peters; Christopher Southan; Michael Spedding; Wenyuan Yu; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Pengfei Yang; Joel S Perlmutter; Tammie L S Benzinger; John C Morris; Jinbin Xu Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Paula Trujillo; Nelleke C van Wouwe; Ya-Chen Lin; Adam J Stark; Kalen J Petersen; Hakmook Kang; David H Zald; Manus J Donahue; Daniel O Claassen Journal: Cortex Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Gabriel Yepes; Xavier Guitart; William Rea; Amy H Newman; Richard P Allen; Christopher J Earley; César Quiroz; Sergi Ferré Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 10.422