| Literature DB >> 35296314 |
Prapaporn Chaniad1,2, Arisara Phuwajaroanpong1,2, Walaiporn Plirat1,2, Tachpon Techarang1,2, Arnon Chukaew3, Chuchard Punsawad4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In response to the persistent problem of malaria resistance, medicinal herbal plants can be used as a source of potential novel antimalarial agents. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo antimalarial activity and toxicity of an ethanolic seed extract of Spondias pinnata (L.f.) Kurz (S. pinnata).Entities:
Keywords: Antimalarial activity; Malaria; Plasmodium berghei; Spondias pinnata; Toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35296314 PMCID: PMC8928678 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-022-03546-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Med Ther ISSN: 2662-7671
Phytochemical screening of the ethanolic S. pinnata seed extract
| Phytochemical constituents | Result |
|---|---|
| Flavonoids | |
| Terpenoids | |
| Alkaloids | |
| Tannins | |
| Anthraquinones | |
| Cardiac glycosides | |
| Saponins | |
| Coumarins |
( +): presence, (-): absence of phytochemical constituents
Fig. 1GC–MS chromatogram of ethanolic S. pinnata seed extract
Compounds identified in the ethanolic S. pinnata seed extract by GC–MS
| No | RT (min) | Compound name | Molecular formula | MW | Peak area (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.472 | Acetal | C6H14O2 | 118 | 2.02 |
| 2 | 3.609 | Furfural | C5H4O2 | 96 | 0.50 |
| 3 | 9.628 | 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural | C6H6O3 | 126 | 1.75 |
| 4 | 12.162 | Vanillin | C8H8O3 | 152 | 1.34 |
| 5 | 13.327 | Levoglucosan | C6H10O5 | 162 | 1.52 |
| 6 | 13.839 | Phenol,2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)- | C14H22O | 206 | 0.35 |
| 7 | 14.629 | 3-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzoic acid | C8H8O4 | 168 | 1.58 |
| 8 | 17.529 | Protocatechuic acid | C7H6O4 | 154 | 0.59 |
| 9 | 19.061 | Syringic acid | C9H10O5 | 198 | 0.50 |
| 10 | 20.305 | Dodecanoic acid, 3-hydroxy- | C12H24O3 | 216 | 0.10 |
| 11 | 21.078 | Gallic acid | C7H6O5 | 170 | 0.33 |
| 12 | 21.740 | Palmitic acid | C16H32O2 | 256 | 2.04 |
| 13 | 22.392 | Ethyl palmitate | C18H36O2 | 284 | 0.83 |
| 14 | 22.944 | Isopropyl palmitate | C19H38O2 | 298 | 0.18 |
| 15 | 24.832 | Linoleic acid | C18H32O2 | 280 | 5.41 |
| 16 | 24.918 | Oleic acid | C18H34O2 | 282 | 5.37 |
| 17 | 25.304 | Octadecanoic acid | C18H36O2 | 284 | 1.21 |
| 18 | 25.362 | Linoleic acid ethyl ester | C20H36O2 | 308 | 3.21 |
| 19 | 25.460 | Ethyl oleate | C20H38O2 | 310 | 1.64 |
| 20 | 25.632 | Palmitic acid amide | C16H33NO | 255 | 1.43 |
| 21 | 25.908 | Ethyl stearate | C20H40O2 | 312 | 0.43 |
| 22 | 28.580 | E,E,Z-1,3,12-Nonadecatriene-5,14-diol | C19H34O2 | 294 | 0.24 |
| 23 | 28.675 | Oleic acid amide | C18H35NO | 281 | 11.02 |
| 24 | 28.975 | Spiculesporic acid | C17H28O6 | 328 | 1.26 |
| 25 | 29.080 | Octadecanamide | C18H37NO | 283 | 1.66 |
| 26 | 31.280 | Benzophenone-6 | C15H14O5 | 274 | 0.37 |
| 27 | 31.909 | cis-11-Eicosenamide | C20H39NO | 309 | 0.38 |
| 28 | 33.141 | 10,11-Dihydro-10-hydroxy-2,3-dimethoxydibenz(b,f)oxepin | C16H16O4 | 272 | 2.58 |
| 29 | 42.030 | β-Sitosterol | C29H50O | 414 | 6.45 |
RT Retention time
Effect of the ethanolic S. pinnata seed extract on parasite level, parasite suppression, and mean survival time during the 4-day suppressive test
| Group | Dose | % Parasitemia | % Suppression | Mean survival time (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | - | 33.44 ± 0.18b,c,d,e,f | - | 9.60 ± 0.61b,f |
| Positive control | 6 | 1.10 ± 0.21a,c,d,e,f | 96.72 ± 0.62a,c,d,e,f | 18.40 ± 0.88a,c,d |
| 250 | 25.77 ± 0.34a,b,d,e,f | 22.94 ± 1.02a,b,d,e,f | 10.20 ± 0.92a,f | |
| 500 | 17.05 ± 1.04a,b,c,e,f | 49.01 ± 3.10a,b,c,e,f | 13.20 ± 1.99b | |
| 600 | 13.15 ± 1.11a,b,c,d,f | 60.67 ± 3.32a,b,c,d,f | 14.00 ± 2.05 | |
| 800 | 11.10 ± 1.34a,b,c,d,e | 66.82 ± 4.00a,b,c,d,e | 16.20 ± 2.03a,c |
Data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 5 per group)
aCompared with the negative control group receiving a mixture of 7% Tween 80 and 3% ethanol in distilled water, bcompared with the positive control group receiving 6 mg/kg artesunate, ccompared with 250 mg/kg extract, dcompared with 500 mg/kg extract, ecompared with 600 mg/kg extract, and fcompared with 800 mg/kg extract
Effect of the ethanolic S. pinnata seed extract on the parasite level and parasite suppression in the curative activity test
| Group | Dose | % Parasitemia | % Suppression | Mean survival time (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | - | 32.94 ± 2.98b,c,d,e,f | - | 10.00 ± 3.29 |
| Positive control | 6 | 4.71 ± 0.92a,c,d,e,f | 85.71 ± 2.79a,c,d,e,f | 16.60 ± 1.85c,d |
| 250 | 27.32 ± 1.14a,b,d,e,f | 17.05 ± 3.47a,b,d,e,f | 7.20 ± 1.10b | |
| 500 | 18.96 ± 1.19a,b,c,e,f | 42.46 ± 3.62a,b,c,e,f | 8.20 ± 1.30b | |
| 600 | 14.23 ± 1.22a,b,c,d | 56.79 ± 3.70a,b,c,d | 9.60 ± 1.14 | |
| 800 | 15.96 ± 1.10a,b,c,d | 51.54 ± 3.33a,b,c,d | 13.20 ± 6.98 |
Data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 5 per group)
aCompared with the negative control group receiving a mixture of 7% Tween 80 and 3% ethanol in distilled water, bcompared with the positive control group receiving 6 mg/kg artesunate, ccompared with 250 mg/kg extract, dcompared with 500 mg/kg extract, ecompared with 600 mg/kg extract, and fcompared with 800 mg/kg extract
Effect of the ethanolic S. pinnata seed extract on parasite levels and parasite suppression during the prophylactic test
| Group | Dose | % Parasitemia | % Suppression | Mean survival time (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | - | 20.39 ± 0.96b,c,d,e,f | - | 11.60 ± 4.59 |
| Positive control | 6 | 13.47 ± 0.62a,c,d,e | 33.93 ± 3.03a,c,d,e | 16.20 ± 4.79 |
| 250 | 17.67 ± 0.81a,b,d,e,f | 13.35 ± 3.99a,b,d,e,f | 11.40 ± 1.52 | |
| 500 | 15.29 ± 1.03a,b,c,f | 24.99 ± 5.05a,b,c,f | 14.60 ± 3.91 | |
| 600 | 15.19 ± 0.53a,b,c,f | 25.49 ± 2.58a,b,c,f | 14.40 ± 4.04 | |
| 800 | 14.06 ± 0.79a,c,d,e | 31.06 ± 3.87a,c,d,e | 15.20 ± 3.90 |
Data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 5 per group)
aCompared with the negative control group receiving a mixture of 7% Tween 80 and 3% ethanol in distilled water, bcompared with the positive control group receiving 6 mg/kg artesunate, ccompared with 250 mg/kg extract, dcompared with 500 mg/kg extract, ecompared with 600 mg/kg extract, and fcompared with 800 mg/kg extract
Effect of the ethanolic S. pinnata seed extract on mouse food and water consumption in the acute toxicity test
| Food consumption (g) | Untreated control | Negative control | 2,000 mg/kg extract |
| Week 1 | 26.29 ± 3.15 | 27.29 ± 2.36 | 26.00 ± 2.24 |
| Week 2 | 25.71 ± 2.14 | 26.86 ± 1.95 | 24.29 ± 3.68 |
| Water consumption (mL) | |||
| Week 1 | 49.71 ± 3.04 | 50.57 ± 1.72 | 51.71 ± 2.36 |
| Week 2 | 69.86 ± 3.02 | 68.57 ± 8.16 | 70.00 ± 4.62 |
Data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 5 per group)
Differences in body weight in the acute toxicity test before (D0) and 14 days after (D14) administration of the ethanolic S. pinnata seed extract
| Group | Mean body weight (g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated control | 34.16 ± 1.28b | 39.84 ± 2.16 | 14.17 ± 1.93 |
| Negative control | 34.38 ± 0.63b | 40.57 ± 0.64 | 15.26 ± 0.82 |
| 2,000 mg/kg extract | 32.55 ± 0.90a | 38.35 ± 2.47 | 14.96 ± 3.81 |
Data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 5 per group)
aCompared with the negative control group that received a mixture of 7% Tween 80 and 3% ethanol in distilled water and bcompared to the treatment group that received a dose of 2,000 mg/kg body weight
Effect of ethanolic S. pinnata seed extract on kidney and liver functions in the acute toxicity test
| Parameter | Untreated control | Negative control | 2,000 mg/kg extract |
|---|---|---|---|
| AST (U/L) | 86.80 ± 5.15 | 87.50 ± 2.50 | 83.40 ± 5.64 |
| ALT (U/L) | 35.36 ± 3.30 | 37.50 ± 3.20 | 36.20 ± 4.02 |
| ALP (U/L) | 85.90 ± 4.09 | 86.03 ± 3.23 | 83.40 ± 2.07 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 25.36 ± 2.88 | 27.72 ± 1.30b | 24.36 ± 0.68a |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.04 | 0.63 ± 0.02 |
Data are presented as the means ± SDs (n = 5 per group)
acompared to the negative control group, and bcompared to the treatment group that received a dose of 2,000 mg/kg body weight
Fig. 2Histopathological changes in liver and kidney tissues from the untreated control group (a) and (d), negative control group (b) and (e), and treatment group that received a single dose of 2,000 mg/kg body weight (c) and (f). All images were acquired at 20X magnification. Bar = 20 μm. Central vein (CV), hepatocyte (H), tubule (T), and glomerulus (G)