Literature DB >> 35294765

Automatic Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Modeling to Fill Data Gaps in High-Throughput Screening.

Heather L Ciallella1, Elena Chung1, Daniel P Russo1,2, Hao Zhu3,4.   

Abstract

Advances in high-throughput screening (HTS) revolutionized the environmental and health sciences data landscape. However, new compounds still need to be experimentally synthesized and tested to obtain HTS data, which will still be costly and time-consuming when a large set of new compounds need to be studied against many tests. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling is a standard method to fill data gaps for new compounds. The major challenge for many toxicologists, especially those with limited computational backgrounds, is efficiently developing optimized QSAR models for each assay with missing data for certain test compounds. This chapter aims to introduce a freely available and user-friendly QSAR modeling workflow, which trains and optimizes models using five algorithms without the need for a programming background.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-throughput screening; Models; Predictions; Quantitative structure–activity relationships

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35294765     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2213-1_16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme.

Authors:  B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-10-20

2.  Extended-connectivity fingerprints.

Authors:  David Rogers; Mathew Hahn
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  Advancing computer-aided drug discovery (CADD) by big data and data-driven machine learning modeling.

Authors:  Linlin Zhao; Heather L Ciallella; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

5.  Comparison of Deep Learning With Multiple Machine Learning Methods and Metrics Using Diverse Drug Discovery Data Sets.

Authors:  Alexandru Korotcov; Valery Tkachenko; Daniel P Russo; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Comparing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms and Metrics for Estrogen Receptor Binding Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel P Russo; Kimberley M Zorn; Alex M Clark; Hao Zhu; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Advancing Computational Toxicology in the Big Data Era by Artificial Intelligence: Data-Driven and Mechanism-Driven Modeling for Chemical Toxicity.

Authors:  Heather L Ciallella; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Construction of a Virtual Opioid Bioprofile: A Data-Driven QSAR Modeling Study to Identify New Analgesic Opioids.

Authors:  Xuelian Jia; Heather L Ciallella; Daniel P Russo; Linlin Zhao; Morgan H James; Hao Zhu
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 8.198

9.  An overview of the PubChem BioAssay resource.

Authors:  Yanli Wang; Evan Bolton; Svetlana Dracheva; Karen Karapetyan; Benjamin A Shoemaker; Tugba O Suzek; Jiyao Wang; Jewen Xiao; Jian Zhang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Predictive modeling of estrogen receptor agonism, antagonism, and binding activities using machine- and deep-learning approaches.

Authors:  Heather L Ciallella; Daniel P Russo; Lauren M Aleksunes; Fabian A Grimm; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.662

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.