| Literature DB >> 35294734 |
Jingxuan Deng1,2, Zhenxing Huang1,2, Jinbo Wang3, Xiaohong Shan4, Wansheng Shi1,2, Wenquan Ruan5,6.
Abstract
Thiourea is used in agriculture and industry as a metal scavenger, synthetic intermediate, and nitrification inhibitor. However, in wastewater, it can inhibit the nitrification process and induce the collapse of the nitrification system. In such a case, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) lose their ability to remove ammonia. We investigated the nitrification system of a 60,000-t/d municipal sewage treatment plant in Nanjing, which collapsed after receiving 5-15 ppm (5-15 mg/L) thiourea. Ammonia nitrogen removal quickly recovered to more than 95% after inoculation with 10 t high-efficiency nitrification sludge, which was collected from a kitchen waste treatment plant. A heterotrophic nitrification strain was isolated from the inoculated sludge and identified as wild Pseudomonas by 16S rDNA sequencing and named "BT1." Based on thiourea tolerance tests, BT1 can tolerate a thiourea content of more than 500 ppm. For comparison, the in situ process was imitated by the simulation system, and the wastewater shocked by 10 ppm thiourea could still meet the emission standard after adding 1% (V/V) BT1. High-throughput sequencing analysis was applied to study microbial succession during thiourea shock loading. The results showed that Hydrogenophaga and Thiobacillus grew with the growth of BT1. Pseudomonas BT1 was used for a 6,000-t/d printed circuit board (PCB) wastewater treatment system, the nitrification system returned to normal in 15 days, and the degradation rate stabilized at more than 95%.Entities:
Keywords: BT1; Heterotrophic nitrification; Thiourea
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35294734 PMCID: PMC9205789 DOI: 10.1007/s12010-022-03850-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Biochem Biotechnol ISSN: 0273-2289 Impact factor: 3.094
Parameters of the high-efficiency DN reactor from kitchen wastewater process
| NH4-N INF (ppm) | NH4-N EFF (ppm) | TN-INF (ppm) | TN-EFF (ppm) | COD-INF (ppm) | COD-EFF (ppm) | MLSS (ppm) | DO (ppm) | RAS | SV30 | HRT (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 ± 200 | 20–35 | 2,500 ± 500 | 200–300 | 8,000 ± 2,000 | 700–1,000 | 8,000–10,000 | <1 | 1000% | 100% | 36–48 |
Degradation of ammonia in the physicochemical effluent by activated carbon adsorption
| Time/h | 1% microbial agent | 1% activated carbon | 1%activated carbon+1% microbial agent | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH4+-N/(mg·L−1) | pH | NH4+-N/(mg·L−1) | pH | NH4+-N/(mg·L−1) | pH | |
| 1 | 26.38 | 7.75 | 24.34 | 7.75 | 25.61 | 7.71 |
| 5 | 22.85 | 7.82 | 20.5 | 7.82 | 22.71 | 7.76 |
| 17 | 19.54 | 7.75 | 22.75 | 7.75 | 11.85 | 7.61 |
Degradation of ammonia in the physicochemical effluent by the combination of Fenton and a biological synergistic agent
| Time/h | 1% microbial agent | Fenton treatment | Fenton treatment+1%microbial agent | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH4+-N/(mg·L−1) | pH | NH4+-N/(mg·L−1) | pH | NH4+-N/(mg·L−1) | pH | |
| 1 | 26.38 | 7.75 | 38.03 | 7.55 | 31.54 | 7.52 |
| 5 | 22.85 | 7.82 | 41.2 | 7.51 | 42.89 | 7.55 |
| 17 | 19.54 | 7.75 | 33.75 | 7.32 | 19.53 | 7.25 |
Degradation of ammonia nitrogen in effluent by activated sludge reflux adsorption
| Time/h | 1% microbial agent | activated sludge reflux | activated sludge reflux+1% microbial agent | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NH4+-N/(mg·L−1) | pH | NH4+-N/(mg·L−1) | pH | NH4+-N/(mg·L−1) | pH | |
| 1 | 26.38 | 7.75 | 22.71 | 7.78 | 37.63 | 7.6 |
| 5 | 22.85 | 7.82 | 23.71 | 7.53 | 30.12 | 7.6 |
| 17 | 19.54 | 7.75 | 20.89 | 7.63 | 0.41 | 7.2 |
Fig. 1a Thiourea concentrations of the influent (INF) and effluent (EFF) water of the 60,000-t/d sewage treatment plant (ND, not detected). b Microscopic examination of the activated sludge after toxic shock, showing the reproduction of filamentous bacteria
Fig. 2Recovery of the investigated nitrification system over time. a Changes in NH4+-N concentrations of the influent (INF) and effluent (EFF) water over time. b Changes in NH4+-N concentrations of the INF and EFF water during bioaugmentation time
Fig. 3Pseudomonas BT1 under six thiourea concentrations (0, 10, 100, 250, 350, and 500 ppm). a NH4+-N concentration; b NH4+-N removal rate; c ammonia oxide rate; and d OD600 changes. Data points and error bars represent the average and standard deviations of the three replicates, respectively
Fig. 4a Ammonia removal efficiencies of the reactors at different thiourea concentrations. b Microbial community composition of the activated sludge at the genus level in the initial and final stages. c The dominant genera with significant differences in the initial and final stages of the two reactors (★YS: initial activated sludge from WWTPs; CK: activated sludge at Phase VII of reactor A; and SY: activated sludge at Phase VII of reactor B)
Fig. 5Bioaugmentation with the use of Pseudomonas BT1 in PCB wastewater. a Thiourea detection of biochemical system effluent before and after the collapse; b A/O activated sludge reflux combined with bioaugmentation process; c change of ammonia nitrogen degradation rate in. each unit of A/O system
Abundances of the major genera in the two reactors and variations in abundance patterns
| Number | Typical classification | Genera | Abundance (%) | Abundance shift | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YS | CK | SY | CK-VS-YS | SY-VS-YS | |||
| 1 | BT1 | 1 | —— | —— | —— | —— | |
| 2 | AOB | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | ↓a | ↓ | |
| 3 | NOB | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | ↓ | ↓ | |
| 4 | HNB | 0.6 | 2.1 | 7.2 | ↑ | ↑↑b | |
| 5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.8 | ↓ | ↓ | ||
| 6 | Filamentous | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0.1 | ↑ | ↓ | |
| 7 | 21.5 | 26.3 | 20.2 | ↑ | ↓ | ||
| 8 | others | 2.1 | 3.5 | 1.6 | ↑ | ↓ | |
| 9 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 20.5 | ↓ | ↑↑↑c | ||
| 10 | 8.2 | 3.9 | 0.8 | ↓↓ | ↓↓ | ||
| 11 | 0 | 0.3 | 2.7 | ↑ | ↑↑ | ||
a↑/↓: <2%; b↑↑/↓↓:2-5%; c: ↑↑↑/↓↓↓: >5%