Mohammad Alkhalil1,2,3, Vladimír Džavík1, Deepak L Bhatt4, Roxana Mehran5, Shamir R Mehta6. 1. Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 2. Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. 3. Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. 4. Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 6. Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada. smehta@mcmaster.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The evidence for use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the elective setting is relatively sparse and is based on data from more than two decades ago. We will review the evidence supporting the use of DAPT with focus on stable patients undergoing elective PCI, including the role of potent P2Y12 inhibitors, modified DAPT durations, and more recently, aspirin discontinuation. RECENT FINDINGS: Clopidogrel is the recommended P2Y12 inhibitor in the elective PCI setting. The benefit of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor or prasugrel in stable patients is unproven, but their use might be reasonable in those with high clinical or angiographic features of increased ischemic risk without increased risk of bleeding. Moreover, extending DAPT beyond 12 months is associated with a reduction in ischemic events but also increased bleeding. In contrast, shortening DAPT (3-6 months) reduces bleeding compared with 1 year of treatment, but it is also probably associated with increased ischemic events, mainly in higher-risk patients undergoing complex PCI. Recently, early aspirin discontinuation at 3 months (and perhaps as early as 1 month) following PCI reduces bleeding, with no evidence to suggest an increase in ischemic events. Clopidogrel is the P2Y12 inhibitor of choice, while more data are required to support the use of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors in stable patients. The duration of DAPT should be tailored to individual patient ischemic and bleeding risks. New strategies, such as early aspirin discontinuation, are promising to reduce bleeding risk without increase in ischemic risk.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The evidence for use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the elective setting is relatively sparse and is based on data from more than two decades ago. We will review the evidence supporting the use of DAPT with focus on stable patients undergoing elective PCI, including the role of potent P2Y12 inhibitors, modified DAPT durations, and more recently, aspirin discontinuation. RECENT FINDINGS: Clopidogrel is the recommended P2Y12 inhibitor in the elective PCI setting. The benefit of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors such as ticagrelor or prasugrel in stable patients is unproven, but their use might be reasonable in those with high clinical or angiographic features of increased ischemic risk without increased risk of bleeding. Moreover, extending DAPT beyond 12 months is associated with a reduction in ischemic events but also increased bleeding. In contrast, shortening DAPT (3-6 months) reduces bleeding compared with 1 year of treatment, but it is also probably associated with increased ischemic events, mainly in higher-risk patients undergoing complex PCI. Recently, early aspirin discontinuation at 3 months (and perhaps as early as 1 month) following PCI reduces bleeding, with no evidence to suggest an increase in ischemic events. Clopidogrel is the P2Y12 inhibitor of choice, while more data are required to support the use of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors in stable patients. The duration of DAPT should be tailored to individual patient ischemic and bleeding risks. New strategies, such as early aspirin discontinuation, are promising to reduce bleeding risk without increase in ischemic risk.
Authors: P Hall; S Nakamura; L Maiello; A Itoh; S Blengino; G Martini; M Ferraro; A Colombo Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-01-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S R Mehta; S Yusuf; R J Peters; M E Bertrand; B S Lewis; M K Natarajan; K Malmberg; H Rupprecht; F Zhao; S Chrolavicius; I Copland; K A Fox Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-08-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Keith A A Fox; Shamir R Mehta; Ron Peters; Feng Zhao; Nasser Lakkis; Bernard J Gersh; Salim Yusuf Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-08-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Schömig; F J Neumann; A Kastrati; H Schühlen; R Blasini; M Hadamitzky; H Walter; E M Zitzmann-Roth; G Richardt; E Alt; C Schmitt; K Ulm Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-04-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E S Barnathan; J S Schwartz; L Taylor; W K Laskey; J P Kleaveland; W G Kussmaul; J W Hirshfeld Journal: Circulation Date: 1987-07 Impact factor: 29.690