Literature DB >> 35294588

Microbial community characterization in advanced water reclamation for potable reuse.

Tatiana C Guarin1, Lin Li1, Krishna R Pagilla2.   

Abstract

This study investigated the microbial community structure and composition across two treatment steps used in advanced water reclamation for potable reuse applications, namely Coagulation/Flocculation/Clarification/Granular Media Filtration (CFCGMF) and Ozone-Biological Activated Carbon filtration (O3/BAC). The study examined the richness, variations, and similarities of the microorganisms involved at each treatment step to better understand the role of ecology and the dynamics on unit process performance and the microbial community developed within it. The bacterial microbiomes at each treatment step were independently characterized using 16S metagenomic sequencing. Combining both treatment steps, a total of 3801 species were detected. From the total species detected, 38% and 98% were identified at CFCGMF and O3/BAC, respectively. The most abundant phyla were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes in both treatment steps. The identified species were classified based on their preferences to free-living style (59%) vs attached-living style (22%) showing a relatively low richness in the BAC media, but higher diversities. At the taxonomic class level, Betaproteobacteria was the predominant in both system processes. Additionally, a list of eight genera were identified as potential bacterial pathogens present in both process effluents. They are Aeromonas, Clostridium, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Flavobacterium, Legionella, Mycobacterium, and Pseudomonas. CFCGMF effluent yielded less pathogenic bacteria than both the ozone and BAC filter effluent from the O3/BAC process unit; their relative abundance accounted for about 2% and 8% for CFCGMF and O3/BAC, respectively. Detailed studies to characterize the microbial communities are crucial in interpreting the mechanisms and synergies between processes performance and microorganisms by identifying the needs and best practices to ensure public health protection. Key points • Microbial communities of two treatment processes are characterized using 16S rRNA sequencing. • Organisms that can tolerate ozone and form biofilms define microbial community in subsequent biofilters. • In relatively low abundances, potential pathogenic bacteria are detected in the treated water.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced water reclamation; Biological active carbon filtration; Coagulation; Microbial ecology; Ozonation; Pathogenic bacteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35294588     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-11873-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  22 in total

1.  Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Is biological treatment a viable alternative for micropollutant removal in drinking water treatment processes?

Authors:  Jessica Benner; Damian E Helbling; Hans-Peter E Kohler; Janneke Wittebol; Elena Kaiser; Carsten Prasse; Thomas A Ternes; Christian N Albers; Jens Aamand; Benjamin Horemans; Dirk Springael; Eddy Walravens; Nico Boon
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Microbial community characterization of ozone-biofiltration systems in drinking water and potable reuse applications.

Authors:  Daniel Gerrity; Mayara Arnold; Eric Dickenson; Duane Moser; Joshua D Sackett; Eric C Wert
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Using discrete and online ATP measurements to evaluate regrowth potential following ozonation and (non)biological drinking water treatment.

Authors:  Glen Andrew de Vera; Eric C Wert
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Free-living bacteria and potential bacterial pathogens in sewage treatment plants.

Authors:  Kailong Huang; Yanping Mao; Fuzheng Zhao; Xu-Xiang Zhang; Feng Ju; Lin Ye; Yulin Wang; Bing Li; Hongqiang Ren; Tong Zhang
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Justin Kuczynski; Jesse Stombaugh; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth K Costello; Noah Fierer; Antonio Gonzalez Peña; Julia K Goodrich; Jeffrey I Gordon; Gavin A Huttley; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Jeremy E Koenig; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Daniel McDonald; Brian D Muegge; Meg Pirrung; Jens Reeder; Joel R Sevinsky; Peter J Turnbaugh; William A Walters; Jeremy Widmann; Tanya Yatsunenko; Jesse Zaneveld; Rob Knight
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar; Brian J Haas; Jose C Clemente; Christopher Quince; Rob Knight
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  Biotechnological Potential of Bdellovibrio and Like Organisms and Their Secreted Enzymes.

Authors:  Eleni Bratanis; Tilde Andersson; Rolf Lood; Ewa Bukowska-Faniband
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis.

Authors:  Jethro S Johnson; Daniel J Spakowicz; Bo-Young Hong; Lauren M Petersen; Patrick Demkowicz; Lei Chen; Shana R Leopold; Blake M Hanson; Hanako O Agresta; Mark Gerstein; Erica Sodergren; George M Weinstock
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.