Literature DB >> 35294546

Three-Year Follow-Up and Response-Survival Relationship of Nivolumab in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ATTRACTION-3).

Morihito Okada1, Ken Kato2, Byoung Chul Cho3, Masanobu Takahashi4, Chen-Yuan Lin5, Keisho Chin6, Shigenori Kadowaki7, Myung-Ju Ahn8, Yasuo Hamamoto9, Yuichiro Doki10, Chueh-Chuan Yen11, Yutaro Kubota12, Sung-Bae Kim13, Chih-Hung Hsu14, Eva Holtved15, Ioannis Xynos16, Yasuhiro Matsumura17, Akira Takazawa18, Yuko Kitagawa19.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Limited long-term data are available on immune checkpoint inhibitor use in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We report 3-year follow-up data from our study of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (paclitaxel or docetaxel) in patients with previously treated ESCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ATTRACTION-3 was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial. Overall survival (OS), time from randomization to death from any cause, was the primary endpoint. An exploratory subanalysis assessed OS according to the best overall response (BOR) with and without landmark at 4 months.
RESULTS: Of the enrolled patients, 210 received nivolumab and 209 received chemotherapy. With a minimum follow-up of 36.0 months, OS was longer in the nivolumab versus the chemotherapy group (median, 10.9 vs. 8.5 months; HR, 0.79; P = 0.0264), with 3-year OS rates of 15.3% and 8.7%, respectively. The median OS was longer with nivolumab versus chemotherapy irrespective of the BOR (complete response/partial response: 19.9 vs. 15.4 months; stable disease: 17.4 vs. 8.8 months; and progressive disease: 7.6 vs. 4.2 months). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were reported in 40 patients (19.1%) in the nivolumab group and 133 patients (63.9%) in the chemotherapy group.
CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab as second-line therapy demonstrated clinically meaningful long-term improvement in OS compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced ESCC. The OS was consistently improved in the nivolumab group compared with the chemotherapy group regardless of BOR. Nivolumab was well tolerated over the 3-year follow-up. See related commentary by Yoon et al., p. 3173. ©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35294546     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  4 in total

1.  The Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Who Receive Curative Treatment.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Miwa Ju; Keisuke Komori; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Ayako Tamagawa; Atsushi Onodera; Junya Morita; Itaru Hashimoto; Tetsushi Ishiguro; Kazuya Endo; Haruhiko Cho; Shizuνe Onuma; Momoko Fukuda; Takashi Oshima; Norio Yukawa; Yasushi Rino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Impact of PD-1 Blockade in Nonresponders: Pitfalls and Promise.

Authors:  Harry H Yoon; Haidong Dong; Qian Shi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 13.801

3.  Current perspectives of the Japanese Esophageal Oncology Group on the development of immunotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Toru Kadono; Shun Yamamoto; Ken Kato
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 2.925

Review 4.  Targeting myeloid villains in the treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Chie Kudo-Saito; Narikazu Boku; Hidekazu Hirano; Hirokazu Shoji
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 8.786

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.