Literature DB >> 35294466

A bioavailable strontium (87Sr/86Sr) isoscape for Aotearoa New Zealand: Implications for food forensics and biosecurity.

R T Kramer1, R L Kinaston1,2, P W Holder3, K F Armstrong3, C L King1, W D K Sipple4, A P Martin5, G Pradel6, R E Turnbull5, K M Rogers6, M Reid7,8, D Barr7, K G Wijenayake8, H R Buckley1, C H Stirling7,9, C P Bataille10.   

Abstract

As people, animals and materials are transported across increasingly large distances in a globalized world, threats to our biosecurity and food security are rising. Aotearoa New Zealand is an island nation with many endemic species, a strong local agricultural industry, and a need to protect these from pest threats, as well as the economy from fraudulent commodities. Mitigation of such threats is much more effective if their origins and pathways for entry are understood. We propose that this may be addressed in Aotearoa using strontium isotope analysis of both pests and products. Bioavailable radiogenic isotopes of strontium are ubiquitous markers of provenance that are increasingly used to trace the origin of animals and plants as well as products, but currently a baseline map across Aotearoa is lacking, preventing use of this technique. Here, we have improved an existing methodology to develop a regional bioavailable strontium isoscape using the best available geospatial datasets for Aotearoa. The isoscape explains 53% of the variation (R2 = 0.53 and RMSE = 0.00098) across the region, for which the primary drivers are the underlying geology, soil pH, and aerosol deposition (dust and sea salt). We tested the potential of this model to determine the origin of cow milk produced across Aotearoa. Predictions for cow milk (n = 33) highlighted all potential origin locations that share similar 87Sr/86Sr values, with the closest predictions averaging 7.05 km away from their true place of origin. These results demonstrate that this bioavailable strontium isoscape is effective for tracing locally produced agricultural products in Aotearoa. Accordingly, it could be used to certify the origin of Aotearoa's products, while also helping to determine if new pest detections were of locally breeding populations or not, or to raise awareness of imported illegal agricultural products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35294466      PMCID: PMC8926269          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Aotearoa New Zealand’s (hereafter Aotearoa) local and export economy as well as its natural environment have been jeopardized by the introduction of foreign pests and associated diseases [1-5] as well as the selling of impure and fraudulent food products marketed as Aotearoa-made [6-9]. Specifically, Aotearoa’s food industry is vulnerable to tampered, counterfeited, adulterated, and simulated food products [6,8]. Ensuring the purity and integrity of Aotearoa products protects a multi-billion-dollar food industry, with dairy ($16.6 billion NZD), wine ($1.75 billion NZD), and mānuka honey ($314 million NZD) being key agricultural products that are the most common fraudulent goods on the national and international markets [8]. Fraudulent and cheaper varieties of each product result in significant financial losses for the Aotearoa economy [8]. For mānuka honey, it is estimated that the annual recorded profit of $314 million NZD is four times inferior to what would be expected without counterfeit products diluting the market [8]. Consequently, the Treasury of the New Zealand Government estimates that the Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) spends approximately $400 million NZD each year on biosecurity programs that assess, contain, and prevent foreign pests and fraudulent foods from entering and exiting the country [9]. Understanding the origins and pathways of entry is a key piece of information towards this effort but is often very difficult or impossible to provide. Provenancing biological products and organisms in Aotearoa using biogeochemical analyses has been investigated for both food forensics and biosecurity. To date it has been restricted to use of the isotopes of light elements (typically δ2H, δ18O, δ15N, δ13C, and some others) and trace element concentrations, including for the verification of products such as milk powders [10,11], wine [12], fetal bovine serum [13], or for insect pest biosecurity breaches [2]. Currently in Aotearoa, private company Oritain offers origin verification for food and related products [14]. Crown Research Institutes GNS Science [15], Bio-Protection Research Centre at Lincoln University [16] and the Centre for Trace Element Analysis at the University of Otago [17] also perform provenancing consultancy but focus more on research and conservation. Oritain utilizes light element stable isotopes (δ2H, δ18O, δ15N, δ13C) and trace elements (Na, K, Zn, Fe, +35 others) to authenticate and provenance materials within the country and globally. These geochemical methods for provenancing are proven and successful predictors of geographic origin for a variety of materials [18-22], but they have limitations. Of the light element stable isotopes, δ2H and δ18O found in biological tissues are primarily derived from regional precipitation, drinking water, and atmospheric diatomic oxygen [23,24]. Ehleringer et al. [24] found that δ2H and δ18O present in organic tissues displays “spatially explicit patterns” that vary predictably with geography including altitude, latitude, temperature, and continentality [19,25]. However, their interpretation is complex as these isotopes fractionate during biological and physical processes as they circulate through ecosystems and tissues [23,26]. Therefore, while specific tissues usually preserve the spatial patterns observed in precipitation, predicting them requires the impractical development of tissue-specific conversion equations to account for isotopic fractionation [27-29]. In addition, δ2H and δ18O are sensitive to evaporative losses and to exchange, which complicates sample collection, storage, and application [19,25,30-32]. Importantly, δ2H and δ18O variations on the landscape vary continuously and at low spatial resolution, as well as seasonally, making the values redundant regionally [33-35]. Although, in rare situations, the spatial and seasonal distributions of δ2H and δ18O can be useful to differentiate between materials originating from the northern and southern hemispheres [2]. Generally, however, all else being equal it can be challenging to isotopically distinguish between ecosystems that are geologically and climatically similar using only δ2H and δ18O [34,36] because the variation and patterning of atmospheric isotopes may not be distinct enough. This issue is most important in Aotearoa and the greater Pacific where islands and small land masses do not experience the same continentality effects that lead to distinct isotopic variation in other regions of the world. The other light isotopes, δ13C and δ15N, are primarily used to look at variations in diet for humans and animals and farming practices [22,37-42]. Singularly, these isotope tracers have limited application to geographical origin prediction but combining them with other isotopes can assist with provenancing efforts. This is because δ13C and δ15N vary predictably with the climate, dietary resources, and long-term land-use effects as they differentiate between C3 and C4 plants, protein consumption in the diet, and identifying the use of conventional and organic fertilizers in farming systems [37,40,43]. Lastly, all light isotopes are susceptible to variation introduced through the global supermarket, where nonlocal products may be incorporated into modern human diets and blur the geochemical signature within the sample [19,37,44,45]. In addition to the light stable isotopes used for provenancing, trace elements (chemical elements found in low concentrations of less than 100 parts per million (ppm) in the mineral matrix) are also not used to predict origins but can be used for samples of known origin to determine if they have similar or distinguishable chemical profiles from other, potentially fraudulent, samples [46,47]. Chemical profile comparisons can be based on just a few key elements or on a whole suite of elements depending on the sample and reference materials available [47]. For example, trace elements could identify fraudulent food products, like wine or tea, by comparing the chemical fingerprint of the suspicious sample to the authentic product [20,21]. The caveat is that this requires a priori knowledge about the chemical profile for all potential regions of origin to determine if the sample of interest classifies into a particular region or group [20]. While feasible, this would require an extensive database to store the chemical fingerprints for every type of reference material that may need to be provenanced. Furthermore, Koffman et al. [48] found that trace elements from Aotearoa sediments lack the regional variability observed when using lead, neodymium, and strontium isotopes, but trace elements have successfully been used to demonstrate regional variability in Aotearoa soils at multiple scales [49,50]. The analysis of the radiogenic strontium isotope ratio, 87Sr/86Sr, is an alternative approach that has the potential to be broadly applicable without the need for situation-specific research and development. Internationally, this isotope system has been a key investigative method used to predict the region-of-origin for plants, animals, insects, and other biological materials [18,51-56]. Ecosphere 87Sr/86Sr variation primarily reflects the underlying geology but also other processes including chemical weathering, alluvial and fluvial erosion, soil processes, and aerosol deposition (sea salt, volcanic ash, dust, loess) [51,55,57]. Strontium in the geosphere enters the tissues of biological organisms through their uptake of water and ingestion of dietary resources. This integrated 87Sr/86Sr fraction is referred to as biologically available or “bioavailable”. Any minor isotopic fractionation that occurs in the environment is corrected accordingly during analysis [51,52,55,58,59]. Therefore, biological tissues usually retain the “isotopic fingerprint” of the local ecosystem from which dietary resources were obtained [58]. Different biological tissues (plant leaves, hair, nails, teeth, and bone) form and remodel at different rates and the integrated 87Sr/86Sr values in these tissues should reflect where organisms lived at different time frames of their lives [60-62]. Strontium isotope analysis as a tool in forensic tracing has received limited attention to date in Aotearoa mostly due to the cost of analysis when scaled to very large numbers of samples, and the lack of a bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr baseline. Recent efforts have gone some way to tackling these issues, with technical advances to address the former [63] and with Duxfield et al. [64] aggregating published geological data to create a 87Sr/86Sr baseline. The recent baseline [64] summarized the variation in geological 87Sr/86Sr for Aotearoa and did not predict the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr produced through the complex environmental system that 87Sr/86Sr cycles through. Duxfield et al. [64] used a case study to compare plant bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values to their geologic baseline and found that the values fell within the expected ranges based on the underlying lithology but demonstrated smaller 87Sr/86Sr value ranges than the geological unit they were associated with. These results are most likely due to the geological 87Sr/86Sr baseline not considering the exogenous sources of 87Sr/86Sr in the biosphere that are influenced by climatic, atmospheric, and environmental conditions. Also, some of the published geological data they used are based on 87Sr/86Sr compositions for individual mineral phases rather than the bulk rock, which homogenizes mineral signatures. Similar to baselines, isoscapes are models that predict the spatial distribution of isotopes by incorporating various sources that contribute to the bioavailable isotope “pool” of a region [65-72]. Strontium isoscapes have been produced at the continental scale for North America [73], Central America [74], Africa [75], and Europe [76], at regional scales for Australia [77], the Caribbean [78], China [79], the Netherlands [80], France [81], southwest Sweden [82], the Modena [83], and South Korea [84], as well as for island locales such as mainland UK [85] and Ireland [86]. For strontium isotopes, the leading approach to create regional and global isoscapes [51,56,87-89] uses bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values of georeferenced samples (soil, plants, and small local organisms) and a machine-learning framework that considers contributions from the ecosphere to predict bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values across the region of interest. In this paper, we introduce the first bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape model for Aotearoa constructed using a machine-learning approach [51,88] and the best available dataset of geospatial predictors. Specifically, the isoscape construction uses a random forest (RF) model framework that considers a variety of climatic, atmospheric, and environmental variables that may contribute to the spatial distribution of bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr throughout Aotearoa. The RF model also uses bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr data from plants, soils, and animals living in Aotearoa to calibrate the model and ensure that the predicted 87Sr/86Sr model values reflect the actual 87Sr/86Sr values obtained from the real-world samples. Bataille et al. [51] discuss the optimal substrate to sample (plants and soils versus small local animals) when constructing 87Sr/86Sr isoscapes and concluded that while local animals are preferred because they integrate multiple sources of bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr, plants and soils are acceptable alternatives. It is, however, important to consider that plants of different rooting depths take up varying 87Sr/86Sr values depending on the exchangeable soil fraction (the fraction of topsoil sample that is extractable when leached using an ammonium nitrate solution) [51,90,91]. To compensate for this, the sampling strategy of this study targeted plants of varying root depths (shallow, medium, and deep) at each sampling location to ensure that any intra-site 87Sr/86Sr variability was captured. Shallow roots are defined as slender, branched, fibrous or creeping roots that grow close to the surface. Medium roots include larger plants whose roots penetrate one to two meters below the surface soil. Deep-rooted plants have tap roots that consist of a primary root that penetrates deep into the soil at depths greater than three meters. Using the RF-based methodology allowed us to explain the main environmental influences on the 87Sr/86Sr isoscape and we then validated the use of for provenancing using cow milk samples collected from farms across Aotearoa.

Materials and methods

Bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr sample distribution and descriptive statistics

Plant sample collection sites were chosen based on a strict set of inclusion criteria to circumvent potential anthropogenic and natural Sr contaminants. These criteria avoided farms, pastures, drainage ditches, and other human-made earthworks, and being restricted to public lands with road-access. Riparian areas, land in flood areas and along watercourses, were avoided to avoid any mixing of exogenous Sr sources [92]. Also, the topographic relief and elevation of the regions limited where and when samples could be taken. These factors greatly limited the distribution of the samples (Fig 1). Potential sample stops were planned from an ArcGIS shapefile layer with a highway road feature class overlaid on a geological map to mark where there was a geological change within each area along the route. Leaves were collected from plants of each root-type (shallow, medium, and deep) located within a 5 m diameter of one another at each sample site (when available) to capture a higher resolution of 87Sr/86Sr variation for the single locality. Samples were stored in labeled, plastic sample bags and dehydrated later the same day in a clean SunBeam food dehydrator before being stored in new clean and labeled, plastic sample bags. Plant type, root-depths, and other metadata are provided in the Supplementary Information (S3 File).
Fig 1

Locations of samples used for developing and validating the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape.

Fig 1 developed in ArcGIS Pro and includes regional boundaries and coastlines feature layers (sourced from Natural Earth) and hillshade feature layer (created using GNS DEM 8m shapefile). Map projected to the New Zealand Transverse Mercator (NZTM 2000).

Locations of samples used for developing and validating the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape.

Fig 1 developed in ArcGIS Pro and includes regional boundaries and coastlines feature layers (sourced from Natural Earth) and hillshade feature layer (created using GNS DEM 8m shapefile). Map projected to the New Zealand Transverse Mercator (NZTM 2000). Topsoil samples (0–20 cm) were collected by GNS Science in the Nelson, Otago, and Southland regions (Fig 1). Samples were collected by hand auger and the sub-2-mm portion was retained after sieving and drying at 40°C [49,93]. Additional soil and plant 87Sr/86Sr data were provided by PWH and KFA for the Christchurch, Bay of Plenty, Auckland, and Northland regions. To date, very few modern local human and animal bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr data have been published for Aotearoa and only eight (two sheep and six humans) were available to include in this study (Fig 1). Multiple analytical methods were utilized to analyze the plant and soil samples and generate the 87Sr/86Sr data. GNS topsoil (n = 71) and collected plant samples (n = 185) were prepared under the supervision of the lab technician in the Centre for Trace Element Analysis, University of Otago, Dunedin. GNS topsoil subsamples of 1g were leached in 2.5 mL of 1 M ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) solution and agitated overnight to extract the bioavailable strontium fraction [53,81,92,94]. Then, the topsoil samples underwent Sr separation column procedures as described previously [76,95,96], while the collected plant samples utilized an automated ion-exchange chromatography method using a 3-ml column (ESI, Part number CF-MC-SrCa-3000) filled with DGA (diglycolamide) resin (TrisKem International, Bruz, France) as described by Wijenayake [97]. Strontium isotope measurement of the collected plant and GNS topsoil samples was conducted at the Centre for Trace Element Analysis, University of Otago using a Nu Plasma-HR MC ICP-MS (Nu Instruments Ltd., UK) following previously reported protocols [76,95-99]. Repeated measurement of the NIST SRM 987 strontium isotope reference material (sourced from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA) and the HPS in-house strontium isotope standard, that bracketed every six samples, were used to monitor the accuracy and external precision of the measurements. We obtained average values of 0.71025 ± 0.00002 (2 SD, n = 70) for NIST SRM 987 and 0.70761 ± 0.00009 (2 SD, n = 58) for HPS in very good agreement with previously reported values. Any instrumental mass fractionation present was corrected for using the exponential mass fractionation lay by normalization to 86Sr/88Sr = 0.1194. Procedural blanks were run with each batch of 6 samples and all yielded negligible Sr levels of < 250 pg. The additional soil and plant samples (n = 126) utilized Sr separation column procedures as described by Pin & Bassin [100]. Sr isotope measurement of the soil samples from [101] was conducted using a Nu Plasma-HR MC ICP-MS (Nu Instruments Ltd., UK) at the Centre for Trace Element Analysis, University of Otago, Dunedin (standard = NIST SRM 987, n = 19, 87Sr/86Sr 0.710274 ±0.000023 (2 SD)); and the additional soil and plant samples [102] measured using Isotopx Phoenix TIMS (thermal ionization mass spectrometry) at the University of Adelaide (NIST SRM 987, n = 7, 87Sr/86Sr = 0.710245 ± 0.000008 (2 SD). Further details regarding preparation and analysis for all plant and soil samples are available in the Supplementary Information (S1.1–5 in S1 File). Altogether, 414 bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr data (Fig 1) were used to construct the strontium isoscape, specifically comprising data from 314 plants (182 unique locations), 92 topsoils (84 unique locations), and eight mammals (two unique locations).

Bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape

This study follows the methodology established by Bataille and colleagues [51,93] using a RF model framework. Model construction used bioavailable, geo-referenced 87Sr/86Sr data gathered for Aotearoa, many geomatic auxiliary variables in the form of global rasters (gridded matrix of cells) used as covariates, and an existing process-based bedrock 87Sr/86Sr model [87,88] to produce the final predicted 87Sr/86Sr isoscape model. The RF R-script provided by Bataille et al. [51,88] optimizes the regression model with the root mean square error (RMSE) and uses five 10-fold repeated cross-validations. Additionally, the R-script includes using the Variable Selection Under Random Forest (VSURF) package [103] to identify relevant and highly predictive variables [51,87-89]. The relationships between the variables selected by the VSURF function and the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr variability were assessed using variable importance purity measure and partial dependence plots [51]. The auxiliary variables were obtained from various sources summarized in S2 Table 1 in S2 File and represent geological, climatic, and environmental variables that may influence bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr variability. Most variables were available as global rasters that were trimmed to an Aotearoa extent and projected to the New Zealand Transverse Mercator 2000 coordinate system. To assess the uncertainty of the isoscape, we used quantile RF regression model to generate quartile-1 and quartile-3 models using the log-transformed 87Sr/86Sr values. We use a log-transformation because the 87Sr/86Sr data have a positively skewed distribution. Then, the quartile-1 model was subtracted from the quartile-3 model (i.e., Q3-Q1) to generate a final interquartile range raster at a resolution of 1 km.

Cow milk samples

Dairy farms throughout the country that contributed cow milk samples agreed to a controlled feeding regime where all cattle were expected to be pasture-fed on-site and were not provided with supplementary feed options [97]. Therefore, the assumption was that the 87Sr/86Sr values of the cow milk would reflect the underlying geology and local atmospheric conditions with no contamination from exogenous 87Sr/86Sr sources. Details regarding the isotopic preparation and analytical methods for the cow milk samples are provided in the Supplementary Information (S1.5 in S1 File). To assess the validity of the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape developed, we predict the region-of-origin for cow milk samples and then assess the accuracy of that assignment relative to their actual origin. Firstly, origin predictions are computed using assignR [104], which operates in a semi-parametric Bayesian framework to calculate the posterior probability of the sample belonging to each cell within the isoscape raster. Statistically, assignR uses a maximum likelihood assignment model and employs Bayes Theorem to calculate the probability that a sample originates from a geographic location given the isotopic signature of the sample [105]. The statistical methodology of the assignR code [104] is adapted from Wunder [71] and Vander Zanden et al. [106]. To facilitate visualization, we created maps displaying the top 33% by area of the predicted surface for each sample (SI4) with the top 33% areas coded as 1 and other areas coded as 0. Once the top 33% probability maps are produced, they are brought into ArcGIS Pro. Then, we calculated the accuracy of the nearest predicted geographic origin (part of the top 33% probability) for each sample in terms of how close they were in km to the actual place of origin for the cow, using the Measure Distance tool in ArcGIS Pro. We also measured the distance from the nearest predicted cell for the top 20% and top 10% probability surfaces to assess the trade-offs between accuracy and precision for these arbitrary thresholds. We do not provide the maps for the top 20% and 10% predictions, but they can be provided upon request.

Results

87Sr/86Sr isotopes and Aotearoa bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape

The bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr data for the plant and soil samples are available in the Supplementary Information (S3 File). The combined values for plants, soils, and local mammals demonstrate comparable distributions, with Quartile 1 = 0.70738 ± 0.00002, median = 0.70832 ± 0.00003, and Quartile 3 = 0.70897 ± 0.00108 (Fig 2). The animal substrate samples display a tighter range of 87Sr/86Sr values compared to the plants and topsoils, with soil displaying the largest variability in 87Sr/86Sr, but 90% of all data fall within values of 0.70500 and 0.71250 (Fig 2).
Fig 2

Stacked plot illustrating the distribution of the collected 87Sr/86Sr variability by substrate.

The animal substrate (n = 8) samples in pink display a tighter range of 87Sr/86Sr values compared to the plants in green (n = 314) and topsoils in blue (n = 92) samples that are all used to construct and calibrate the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape model.

Stacked plot illustrating the distribution of the collected 87Sr/86Sr variability by substrate.

The animal substrate (n = 8) samples in pink display a tighter range of 87Sr/86Sr values compared to the plants in green (n = 314) and topsoils in blue (n = 92) samples that are all used to construct and calibrate the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape model. The final 87Sr/86Sr isoscape for Aotearoa uses the best performing RF model that considered all auxiliary variables (S2 Table 1 in S2 File) and 414 bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values (S3 File). The RF regression model produces a map demonstrating the mean 87Sr/86Sr prediction (R2 = 0.53, RMSE = 0.00098) ranging from 0.70567 to 0.71118, for the entire country including the Chatham Islands (Fig 3A). The accompanying interquartile range raster (Fig 3B) demonstrates a standard error ranging from 0.0001 to 0.002 for the country.
Fig 3

Bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape (A) and interquartile range raster (B) for Aotearoa created using random forest regression. The bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape (A) (R2 = 0.53, RMSE = 0.00098) demonstrates the predicted 87Sr/86Sr values, ranging from 0.70567 to 0.71118, for the entire country including the Chatham Islands. Log-transformed 87Sr/86Sr values of the bioavailable data were used to construct quartile-1 and quartile-3 regression models that were then subtracted from one another (Q3-Q1) to create the final interquartile range raster (B) with values ranging from 0.0001 to 0.002. Figure developed in ArcGIS Pro with a coastlines feature layer (sourced from Natural Earth) and projected to NZTM 2000.

Bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape (A) and interquartile range raster (B) for Aotearoa created using random forest regression. The bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape (A) (R2 = 0.53, RMSE = 0.00098) demonstrates the predicted 87Sr/86Sr values, ranging from 0.70567 to 0.71118, for the entire country including the Chatham Islands. Log-transformed 87Sr/86Sr values of the bioavailable data were used to construct quartile-1 and quartile-3 regression models that were then subtracted from one another (Q3-Q1) to create the final interquartile range raster (B) with values ranging from 0.0001 to 0.002. Figure developed in ArcGIS Pro with a coastlines feature layer (sourced from Natural Earth) and projected to NZTM 2000.

Assessment of Aotearoa 87Sr/86Sr model performance

The VSURF package selected 11 predictive variables (Fig 4A). These include dust and sea salt aerosol deposition (r.dust, r.ssa, r.ssaw), geological attributes (r.age, r.toprock, r.GNSagemax), temperature (r.mat), elevation (r.elevation), and soil characteristics (r.ph, r.clay, r.nitrogen). Initially, the VSURF selected 10 features, but when r.nitrogen was forcibly added to the RF function, the amount of variation explained increased by ~2%. Therefore, r.nitrogen was included in the final model regression. The dominant predictive variables are the rock type classification (r.toprock) and soil pH in H₂O solution (r.ph) based on their Percent Increased Mean Squared Error (%IncMSE) values (Fig 4A). The higher the %IncMSE value, the more important the predictor variable [107]. The n-fold cross validation explains 53% of the variation in the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr model, with an RMSE of 0.00098 over the dataset (Fig 4B). The uncertainty appears uniform across the prediction range (Fig 4B).
Fig 4

Random forest regression performance plots.

Plots demonstrate (A) model variable importance plot and (B) n-fold cross validation with best fit line in red.

Random forest regression performance plots.

Plots demonstrate (A) model variable importance plot and (B) n-fold cross validation with best fit line in red. Partial dependence plots are used to examine the association between the predictors and bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr (Fig 5). These illustrate that 87Sr/86Sr values increase with increasing soil pH (r.ph) and elevation (r.elevation). On the other hand, inverse relationships are apparent where 87Sr/86Sr values increase with decreasing mean annual temperature (r.mat), principal surface lithology type (r.toprock), rock age (r.age, r.GNSagemax), and clay content (r.clay). The “toprock” raster (Fig 5) consists of 67 different lithological classifications (detailed in S2 Table 2 in S2 File) where the first few categories have the highest 87Sr/86Sr values: 1 = floodplain alluvium; 2 = volcanic ashes older than Taupō pumice; 3 = Loess; 4 = Sandstone; 5 = Greywacke; etc. Because this variable is categorical, its correlation with 87Sr/86Sr is most likely coincidental. Both rock age variables, r.GNSagemax and r.age, (Fig 5) demonstrate a threshold-based relationship with bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values showing little influence of age above 300 million years. This is consistent with previous findings demonstrating that the age of rocks is a major contributor to bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values [73,87,88]. The remaining predictive variables, dust and sea salt aerosol deposition (r.dust, r.ssa, r.ssaw) and nitrogen content (r.nitrogen), display non-linear relationships with the 87Sr/86Sr values.
Fig 5

Partial dependence plots with predictive variables (x-axis) and predicted bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr (y-axis).

Units of measurement are provided on the x-axis for each variable. For r.toprock, the x-axis represents the numbered categories of rock type (S2 Table 2 in S2 File and S2 Fig 1 in S2 File) obtained from the New Zealand Land Resource Information System online portal. Refer to the Supplementary Information, S2 Table 1 in S2 File, for descriptions of all variables used in the RF model and their sources.

Partial dependence plots with predictive variables (x-axis) and predicted bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr (y-axis).

Units of measurement are provided on the x-axis for each variable. For r.toprock, the x-axis represents the numbered categories of rock type (S2 Table 2 in S2 File and S2 Fig 1 in S2 File) obtained from the New Zealand Land Resource Information System online portal. Refer to the Supplementary Information, S2 Table 1 in S2 File, for descriptions of all variables used in the RF model and their sources.

Model validation using cow milk

Generally, we found that cow milk with 87Sr/86Sr values near 0.70800 were difficult to assign because most of the isoscape values across Aotearoa fall in a narrow band between the range of 0.70750 and 0.70930. When a sample is within this interval, the probability surfaces show broad regions with high probabilities of origin corresponding to low assignment precision. Conversely, the model performs well when predicting origin for samples that are below 0.70750 or above 0.70930 because these values are much less common on the Aotearoa isoscape allowing for better precision. We produced prediction maps showing the top 33% of isoscape raster cells with the highest posterior probability for each cow milk sample (n = 33) available in the Supplementary Information (S4 File). The cow milk 87Sr/86Sr and the predicted 87Sr/86Sr from the isoscape show a good correlation (R2 = 0.52) when compared with one another (Fig 6). When error bars are included, all cow samples fall within the 95% confidence interval of the linear regression line on the actual versus predicted bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr value plot (Fig 6), except sample Cow 7.
Fig 6

Observed cow milk 87Sr/86Sr (x-axis) versus predicted 87Sr/86Sr values (y-axis) from the bioavailable isoscape.

Error bar values were extracted from the uncertainty raster for each cow milk sample location. The red line represents the line of best fit and the shaded region represents the 95% confidence interval (CI). The black line shows the 1:1 line between predicted and observed 87Sr/86Sr values. Sample points are color-coded by region (regions depicted in Fig 1). All cow milk samples fall within the 95% CI, except sample Cow 7 labeled on plot.

Observed cow milk 87Sr/86Sr (x-axis) versus predicted 87Sr/86Sr values (y-axis) from the bioavailable isoscape.

Error bar values were extracted from the uncertainty raster for each cow milk sample location. The red line represents the line of best fit and the shaded region represents the 95% confidence interval (CI). The black line shows the 1:1 line between predicted and observed 87Sr/86Sr values. Sample points are color-coded by region (regions depicted in Fig 1). All cow milk samples fall within the 95% CI, except sample Cow 7 labeled on plot. The maximum likelihood assignment model was quite accurate and all but one milk sample had high probability cells (top 33%) located within proximity (average of 7.05 kilometers) to the actual dairy farm of origin for each represented region (Tables 1 and 2). We also measured the distance between the nearest probability cell and the dairy farm of actual origin for the top 20% and top 10% probability surfaces to assess the trade-off between precision and accuracy when different probability thresholds are used (Tables 1 and 2). While the accuracy of most origin predictions is high using the top 33% probability threshold, the precision is lacking for most samples. Conversely, the top 20% and top 10% probability thresholds produce precise origin predictions (i.e., they predict fewer regions of potential origin), but the accuracy (distance to known origin) decreases (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1

Cow milk sample data.

Distance from known origin to nearest predicted cell on the probability surface (km)
Sample IDLatitudeLongitudeRegionTop 33%Top 20%Top 10%
Cow 1-38.512176.171Waikato7.067.53627.18
Cow 2-37.883175.462Waikato6.4224.2974.18
Cow 3-37.783175.425Waikato8.3924.6229.82
Cow 4-38.483175.826Waikato000.38
Cow 5-38.173175.877Waikato000
Cow 6-38.201175.600Waikato16.3616.3652.93
Cow 7-37.963177.000Waikato16.8424.7425.59
Cow 8-37.669175.308Waikato02.46315.01
Cow 9-38.436176.341Waikato0.6416.6636.8
Cow 10-38.510176.348Waikato13.9538.2338.28
Cow 11-43.623171.976Canterbury0.151.3220.05
Cow 12-44.097171.488Canterbury02.8615.73
Cow 13-42.767172.936Canterbury1.562.897.689
Cow 14-43.422172.162Canterbury1.531.3743.659
Cow 15-42.767172.949Canterbury0.470.450.43
Cow 16-43.750172.017Canterbury0020
Cow 17-43.595172.017Canterbury0.581.1524.78
Cow 18-43.762171.427Canterbury0041.42
Cow 19-46.598168.363Southland4.86112.76112.76
Cow 20-46.598168.363Southland2.152.1625.252
Cow 21-46.390168.380Southland3.163.3065.331
Cow 22-46.210168.533Southland00.475.401
Cow 23-46.006168.229Southland008.51
Cow 24-46.354168.622Southland18.9521.721.89
Cow 25-46.140168.805Southland12.8713.3233.52
Cow 26-46.276168.042Southland3.536.49669.26
Cow 27-46.310167.965Southland2.9196.34141.2
Cow 28-46.247168.010Southland8.879.2710.13
Cow 29-46.421168.313Southland86.24114.08123.52
Cow 30-45.917170.237Otago004.343
Cow 31-35.323173.772Northland1.241.2031.232
Cow 32-40.355175.610Manawatu- Wanganui000
Cow 33-41.293173.238Nelson13.7714.4737.96
Table 2

Descriptive statistics for cow milk top 33%, 20%, & 10% quantile predictions.

RegionNumberAverage (km)Minimum (km)Maximum (km)Standard Deviation (km)
Top 33% Canterbury80.5401.560.66
Waikato106.97016.846.85
Southland1113.05086.2424.95
All Regions337.05086.2415.38
Top 20% Canterbury81.2602.891.14
Waikato1015.49038.2312.82
Southland1135.540114.0847.63
All Regions3316.990114.0830.82
Top 10% Canterbury816.720.4341.4213.18
Waikato1030.02074.1822.66
Southland1148.805.25141.2053.27
All Regions3330.730141.2036.20
Cow milk samples originating from the Canterbury region produce the most accurate predictions (Tables 1 and 2). For all Canterbury cow milk samples, the prediction maps have high probability cells within 0 to 1.56 km of the actual location. The Waikato region milk samples produce highly and moderately accurate predictions with a 6.97 km average distance away from the nearest predicted cell (Table 2). Samples Cow 4, 5, 8, and 9 are highly accurate with predictions 0–0.64 km from their actual locations. The remaining samples in the Waikato region have predictions 6.42 to 16.84 km away from their known locations (Table 2). For the Southland region, all cow milk samples originated near the city of Invercargill and display variable prediction accuracies. Samples Cow 19–23 and 26–27 are highly accurate (less than 5 km away); Cow 24, 25, and 28 are moderately accurate (6 to 20 km away); and Cow 29 is the least accurate being 86.24 km away from the nearest predicted cell (Table 2).

Discussion

Bioavailable strontium isoscape for Aotearoa

Understanding the geology and climate allows improved modeling of Sr isotope cycles from the geosphere into the biosphere for provenancing materials. Accordingly, the covariates used in the RF model here account for geological and atmospheric conditions in Aotearoa (S2 Table 1 in S2 File). Seven of the eleven highest performing covariates selected by the VSURF package consisted of geological variables (Figs 4 and 5), while the remaining four were atmospheric variables showing the contribution of dust and sea salt aerosols and mean annual temperature to bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values. Of the geological variables, there are several features that can explain the observed range of 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70560–0.71120 ± 0.002, Fig 3) across Aotearoa. These values reflect the variable composition of bedrock for the country, which has a rich geological history [108] that has resulted in areas with distinct mineralogy and rock ages, both factors which strongly affect strontium and consequently bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr [109]. Aotearoa has a compositionally diverse basement geology with formation ages between c. 500–100 million years ago (Ma) (Fig 7). The modern-day distribution of geology reflects terrane accretion and c. 23 Ma of tectonism along the strike-slip system, the Alpine Fault, which bisects the country [108,110,111]. The Alpine Fault juxtaposes terranes which were once contiguous for hundreds of kilometers, resulting in rocks of terrane affinity being present at either end of the country. Fig 7 shows the clear relationship between the geological terranes, Alpine Fault, and bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr, especially in the South Island. In particular, the model predicts the lowest bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70570–0.70750) for the northwestern and southwestern portions of the South Island and Rakiura (Stewart Island). These rocks share a similar geological origin, belonging to the Paleozoic Buller and Takaka terranes of the Indo-Australian plate. The rocks of these terranes are broadly comprised of metasediments and intruding plutonic igneous rocks, called batholiths, that formed along the previously active margin of Gondwana between 500–100 Ma [112,113]. Many of these rocks are of igneous origin or derivation, and therefore tend to have very low 87Sr/86Sr values despite their older age [114,115], though some plutonic igneous rocks are known to have higher 87Sr/86Sr values owing to their derivation from melting ancient crust [116].
Fig 7

Diagrams showing simplified (A) basement terrane geology and (B) bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape highlighting regions with low, intermediate, and high 87Sr/86Sr values. The geology in (A) follows Edbrooke et al. [117]. The Alpine Fault is shown as a solid black line; the division between Eastern Province and Western Province basement rocks is shown by a black dashed line; and the Taupo Volcanic Zone (TVZ) outline is shown by a dotted red line. Low, intermediate, and high Sr value ranges for simplified isoscape (B) were determined using the “Equal Intervals” symbology function in ArcGIS Pro. Black denotes regions of low 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70570–0.70750), dark grey denotes intermediate 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70750–0.70930), and light grey denotes regions with high 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70930–0.71120). Figure developed in ArcGIS Pro using a coastlines feature layer (sourced from Natural Earth) and projected to NZTM 2000.

Diagrams showing simplified (A) basement terrane geology and (B) bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape highlighting regions with low, intermediate, and high 87Sr/86Sr values. The geology in (A) follows Edbrooke et al. [117]. The Alpine Fault is shown as a solid black line; the division between Eastern Province and Western Province basement rocks is shown by a black dashed line; and the Taupo Volcanic Zone (TVZ) outline is shown by a dotted red line. Low, intermediate, and high Sr value ranges for simplified isoscape (B) were determined using the “Equal Intervals” symbology function in ArcGIS Pro. Black denotes regions of low 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70570–0.70750), dark grey denotes intermediate 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70750–0.70930), and light grey denotes regions with high 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70930–0.71120). Figure developed in ArcGIS Pro using a coastlines feature layer (sourced from Natural Earth) and projected to NZTM 2000. The lowest predicted bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape values in the North Island also partially correspond with basement geology–some areas of low predicted 87Sr/86Sr isoscape values correspond with the Dun Mountain-Maitai and the Murihiku terranes (Fig 7). The Dun Mountain-Maitai Terrane is composed of ultramafic rocks overlaid by plutonic and volcanic sequences, that are covered by sedimentary deposits, while the Murihiku Terrane consists largely of sedimentary and volcanic materials [118]. However, in the central North Island bioavailable strontium ratios also appear to be heavily influenced by Quaternary volcanic deposits relating to eruptives from the Taupō Volcanic Zone (S2 Fig 1 in S2 File). These eruptive rocks include ignimbrites and volcanic ashes that date volcanism from around 1.6 Ma to present day [119]. Therefore, these deposits and the ashes that predate them are young and are expected to display low 87Sr/86Sr values. The area immediately surrounding Mount Taranaki in the westernmost region of the central North Island (Fig 7) has been active since c. 130 thousand years ago (Ka) [120] and is also comprised of volcanic rocks that display the low 87Sr/86Sr values characteristic of younger igneous formations [55]. The partial dependence plots (Fig 5) demonstrate this relationship between 87Sr/86Sr values and age as well. Conversely, the highest 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70930–0.71120) of Aotearoa are predicted for areas comprised of the Mesozoic Caples, Rakaia, and Pahau terranes which stretch from the lower South Island along the eastern portion of the North Island (Fig 7). These terranes have mudstone/sandstone protoliths that are variably metamorphosed, but generally increase in metamorphic grade the closer they are to the Alpine fault [121,122]. The Caples Terrane consists of volcaniclastic feldspathic metasedimentary rocks [123]. The Rakaia and Pahau terranes contain variably metamorphosed quartzofeldspathic sedimentary rocks [124]. These rocks are overlain by aerially expansive alluvium and loess deposits in the central east portion of the South Island, around the Canterbury Plains (Fig 7 and S2 Fig 1 in S2 File). The elevated 87Sr/86Sr values for these regions (Fig 7) most likely result from the more felsic (rich in silica) content of the rocks [64]. The juxtaposition of differing geologies along the Alpine Fault also has clear effects on the distribution of bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values in Aotearoa. This fault is primarily a strike-slip system, however uplift on the southeastern side of the fault has resulted in the formation of the Southern Alps. This mountain chain runs along the Alpine Fault and marks the distinction between high and intermediate 87Sr/86Sr values in the model (Fig 7). The elevation partial dependence plot (Fig 5) shows that 87Sr/86Sr values increase with increasing elevation. In addition, erosional forces associated with uplifted areas have generated massive amounts of gravel and dust that are older and have high 87Sr/86Sr values. This gravel and dust have been transported by glaciers, glacier-fed streams, and prevailing westerly winds into the Canterbury plains to the east of the Alps [48,108,125], and therefore affecting 87Sr/86Sr values in this region. Koffman et a. [48] note that the glacial activity and associated glacial outwash expanded the Canterbury Plains by approximately 30,000 km2 by depositing sediments with 87Sr/86Sr values ranging from 0.70950 to 0.71650. Glaciers to the west of the Southern Alps did not create similar outwash plains because they terminated near the edge of the continental shelf creating a distinction between high 87Sr/86Sr values to the East and intermediate 87Sr/86Sr values (0.70750–0.70930) in the West [48]. Although geological 87Sr/86Sr affects bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr, atmospheric variables clearly interact with geology to produce a complex isoscape. Despite its small size, Aotearoa’s climate varies vastly with a warm subtropical climate in the Northland region, a cool temperate climate throughout most of the country, and alpine weather in the mountainous West Coast and Southland regions of the South Island [125]. The mean annual temperature plot (Fig 5) demonstrates that temperature has a significant effect on bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr in Aotearoa where higher 87Sr/86Sr values occur in areas with lower temperatures. This pattern correlates with geological and latitudinal differences between the North and South Islands. The former experiences warmer weather and has more volcanic and low-Sr lithologies (Fig 7), while the latter experiences colder weather and the highest 87Sr/86Sr values occur along the Southern Alps and the Canterbury plains. Precipitation is another atmospheric variable that plays a key role in bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr distributions. The Southern Alps experience some of the highest recordings for mean annual precipitation in Aotearoa, measuring up to 6,000 mm/year, while the land to their east records the lowest rainfall at 250–1,000 mm/year [125,126]. Increased precipitation on this coastal setting probably facilitates a high rate of marine aerosol deposition that is characterized by lower 87Sr/86Sr signatures, as well as historically high deposition of volcanic ash from surrounding volcanic centers particularly in the northwestern South Island and the North Island [55]. This is reflected in the partial dependence plot for the sea salt aerosol deposition where higher rates of deposition are associated with lower 87Sr/86Sr values (Fig 5). However, the lack of bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr samples from these regions does limit the accuracy of the isoscape here (Fig 7). No cow milk samples were obtained from these regions.

Testing the bioavailable isoscape using cow milk samples

Using the first bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape developed here for Aotearoa, this study sought to validate the use of strontium isoscapes for provenancing research, such as food product verification, by predicting the origin for cow milk sampled from around the country. Fig 6 illustrates that all cow milk samples, with one exception (Cow 7), fall within the 95% confidence interval of the line of best fit. This indicates that their measured 87Sr/86Sr values reflect the predicted values obtained from the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape, illustrating that the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape performs well and has the potential to be utilized in provenancing applications. The relatively high regression residual for sample Cow 7 might be due to the addition of non-local feed to the cow’s diet including health supplements, supplementary feed from other Aotearoa regions including ryegrasses (with high calcium content), imported palm kernel expeller (PKE), or even transportation of the cow between regions in Aotearoa that could introduce foreign 87Sr/86Sr values. However, dairy farms that contributed cow milk samples [97] had enforced a controlled feeding regime where all cattle were expected to be pasture-fed on-site and were not provided with supplementary feed options. In Aotearoa, livestock and raw cow’s milk are commonly transported inter-regionally. Prior to going through the pasteurization and production processes, and depending on processing plant availability or maintenance, milk may be transported some distance, between the west and east coasts, particularly in the South Island. The outlier sample, Cow 7, may therefore represent a cow that 1) was not kept on a strict diet or 2) had been transported from another region in Aotearoa. The accuracy and precision of predictions was measured as the distance from their known place of origin to the nearest predicted area of potential origin using different probability quantile thresholds (10%, 20%, and 33%). As expected, the top 33% threshold produced the most accurate (i.e., closest to known origin) predictions, but those predictions covered more potential areas and were less precise (Tables 1 and 2 and S4 File). On the other hand, the top 20% and top 10% thresholds provided more constrained potential region-of-origin predictions, making them more precise, but their accuracy decreased (Tables 1 and 2). Specifically, the average distance away from the place of known origin was 7.05 km for the top 33% threshold, 16.99 km for the top 20%, and 30.73 km for the top 10% threshold (Table 2). This showed that there was a trade-off between precision and accuracy for prediction outputs. In the Supplementary Information (S4 File), we provide prediction maps of the top 33% probability quantile for each cow milk sample. In total, 73% (24 out of 33) of milk samples fell into the intermediate 87Sr/86Sr range with values between 0.70750 and 0.70930 (Figs 6 and 7). Milk that fell into this range originated from the Waikato, Canterbury, Southland, Northland, Manawatu-Wanganui, and Nelson regions (Figs 1 and 6). As indicated by the isoscape, there is high redundancy for bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr across Aotearoa. When samples had 87Sr/86Sr values that fell outside of this intermediate range, region-of-origin predictions were more likely to be very accurate and precise. For example, samples Cow 4 and Cow 5 had the lowest 87Sr/86Sr values (< 0.70750) and produced highly accurate and precise predictions for all probability quantile thresholds (Table 1, Fig 6 and S4 File). Furthermore, samples Cow 11–14, 16, 17, and 30 had 87Sr/86Sr values greater than 0.70930 and all predicted regions of potential origin less than 3 km away from their known place of origin for the top 33% and 20% thresholds (Table 1, Fig 6, and S4 File). When 87Sr/86Sr values did not fall into the low or high ranges, the accuracy of origin predictions decreased, meaning that the distance away from the known place of origin tended to be larger because the assignment model predicted many potential regions of origin with similar bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr values. In these cases, utilizing a second isotope system, such as δ2H and δ18O, may help to constrain the predicted region-of-origin [31,37]. In terms of accuracy, Canterbury region cow milk samples (n = 8) produced the most accurate origin predictions across all probability thresholds with the smallest average distance between the known origin and the nearest predicted cell (Table 2 and S4 File). This strongly implies that the Canterbury cows have a local diet and do not have foreign feed introducing exogenous 87Sr/86Sr values. Conversely, Southland region milk samples (n = 11) produced the least accurate origin predictions across all thresholds (Tables 1 and 2). Fig 6 shows that the majority of the Southland cow milk samples have observed values below the 1:1 black line, implying that their actual 87Sr/86Sr values are higher than the predicted 87Sr/86Sr isoscape values. As mentioned previously, much of the South Island was glaciated about ~26,000 to ~18,000 BP and glacially fed rivers, specifically the Clutha and Mataura rivers and their tributaries, carried sediment from the Wakatipu Valley in the far western portion of the Otago region into the Southland and eastern Otago regions [48]. The fluvial transportation of sediments from the Wakatipu Valley may be a major contributor to the elevated 87Sr/86Sr values of the Southland cow milk samples. Furthermore, the low accuracy may result from the increased geologic diversity in Southland versus Canterbury, where the former is comprised of several terranes, ranging from mafic to felsic, and the former is dominated by the Rakaia Terrane (Fig 7). Even though the Southland cow milk samples fell below the 1:1 line (Fig 6), many of the samples (Cow 19–23, 26, and 27) produced accurate predictions less than 5 km away from their known origin and three other Southland samples (Cow 24, 25, and 28) were only 13 to 19 km off their targets using the top 33% threshold (Table 1). One sample, Cow 29, had the highest 87Sr/86Sr value of the Southland group and was the least accurate where the nearest predicted cell was 86–123 km away from the cow’s known place of origin (Table 1). Since the other milk samples from the Southland region produce accurate to moderately accurate predictions, we do not suspect that the elevated 87Sr/86Sr value of sample Cow 29 was due to its proximity to the coast (i.e., sea salt or dust aerosol deposition) or the introduction of foreign feed. Instead, it is likely that Cow 29 had been transported down to the Southland region from the Canterbury region which is more consistent with its elevated 87Sr/86Sr values. Milk samples were obtained through farms on a voluntary basis, so determining whether this sample had actually been transported from Canterbury was not possible.

Further applications for provenancing materials in Aotearoa

Apart from food science applications, the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape can assist with identifying the origin of new pests, unidentified materials, illegal agricultural products, and origin mislabeling. Specifically, 87Sr/86Sr can help biosecurity organizations within Aotearoa determine if a pest encountered post-border represents a newly introduced pest or an established population bearing local 87Sr/86Sr values [1,99,100,127,128]. For the key pastoral industry, Ferguson et al. [127] estimated that invasive invertebrates alone cost the sector between $1.7 to $2.3 billion NZD annually. New pests and diseases are introduced to Aotearoa through shipping and air traffic pathways [128-131]. One of the highest risk pests for Aotearoa is the exotic brown marmorated stink bug (Halymorpha halys) because it feeds on over 300 species of plants and infestation can ruin entire crops [7]. Recent attempts to define the origins of this invasive stink bug used δ2H and δ18O isotopes from their wings to determine whether a bug detected post-border represented a recently introduced foreign bug or an established population [2]. Holder et al. [2] concluded that the distinct δ2H and δ18O isotope signature of their wings suggested a cooler climate origin, supporting evidence that the specimen was not from a locally breeding, southern hemisphere summer population. Currently, there are no rapid response tools to assess the provenance of these pests when they are introduced which limits the ability to develop effective measures to prevent their arrival in Aotearoa. This leaves agencies poorly informed as to the actual risk, with difficult decisions about embarking on expensive responses that may otherwise have to assume the presence of a locally established population. Recently, Murphy et al. [63] developed a new mass spectrometric method to analyze 87Sr/86Sr in low-Sr samples, such as a single insect, in less time than traditional methods. This new analytical method enables this technology to be used within the limits for biosecurity, commanding very short time frames and availability of very little biological material. Now, coupled with this 87Sr/86Sr isoscape, well supported decisions based on probabilities can be made as to the likely Aotearoa or offshore origin of foreign pests, which is key to determine the most efficient response to prevent their establishment [2]. Prior to this point this had not been possible, anywhere. The identification and removal of foreign pests protects crops from foreign diseases and safeguards the future of endemic flora and fauna species throughout the country. This 87Sr/86Sr-focused approach can be applied globally to determine the local or foreign nature of pests on borders and ports of entry. However, this would require that areas of interest construct bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscapes to compare their samples against. The Aotearoa 87Sr/86Sr isoscape produced by this study could be used alongside other lines of evidence (e.g., isotopic systems, chemical fingerprints), and strontium baseline models from other regions of the world to test whether “Made in New Zealand” food products display expected 87Sr/86Sr signatures or if they are fraudulent products. Furthermore, law enforcement agencies could use the isoscape to predict the region of ‘growing areas’ or determine country of origin using bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr from confiscated illicit drugs, like marijuana or heroin [132,133]. Additionally, although Aotearoa does not encounter many unidentified human remains, if they were recovered and traditional identification methods failed to produce a positive identification, 87Sr/86Sr values from the unidentified person’s teeth could help predict their region or country of origin [19,25,26,37,65,74,77,134,135]. The method of provenancing used in this study is useful because it provides a visual representation of the predicted probability surface that allows for ease of communication and comprehension. Though the predicted maps need to be generated by a specialist, once created, a non-specialist can interpret the prediction map and make decisions about where an unknown material may originate from within Aotearoa using their own criteria. The main limitation with applying the isoscape to provenancing investigations is that the predictions highlight many potential regions-of-origin that have similar 87Sr/86Sr values when using the top 33% threshold. The threshold can be set to 20% or 10% but, as demonstrated here, these thresholds reduce the accuracy of origin predictions. Instead, predicted areas could be further constrained by combining the predictive strength of 87Sr/86Sr with other isotope systems, such as δ2H and δ18O [37,74,89]. Isoscapes for δ2H and δ18O already exist for Aotearoa and can easily be combined in a dual-isotope approach to predict the region-of-origin for unknown materials using the built-in assignment features of the assignR package [104,136-138].

Conclusion

As people, animals, and materials are transported across increasingly large distances in a globalized world, issues with biosecurity and food security are rising. The global pandemic of COVID-19 has highlighted the difficulties we face in tracing and controlling the origins of animals and products that can transport viral loads. In Aotearoa, there are many endemic species and a strong local agricultural industry that must be protected from biosecurity threats. There is an urgent need to have tools which enable the provenancing of pests and agricultural products arriving in and being transported around the islands of Aotearoa, as well as confirm origins of products advertised as ‘New Zealand made’ that enter into overseas markets to protect valuable commodities from fraud. Isotopes are ubiquitous markers of provenance that are increasingly used to trace the origin of food or animals. In this study, we introduced the first bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape for Aotearoa and demonstrated how the isoscape can be used to certify the origin of agricultural products. We improved upon existing methodology to develop a bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape using the best available geospatial datasets to tune the regional isoscape. As anticipated, the primary drivers of bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr variability are the underlying geology, soil pH, and aeolian (dust and sea salt) deposits. We then tested and proved that there is potential for utilizing 87Sr/86Sr isotopes to determine the origin of cow milk and other agricultural products in Aotearoa. Currently, there is little to no geo-referenced bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr data derived from plants, animals, or soil in Aotearoa, beyond this study. As more data become available, the bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape model can be recalibrated and further improved, though we do acknowledge that sampling to fill current geographic gaps in the model is a costly undertaking. With the availability of this baseline bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape, our hope is to promote further research using 87Sr/86Sr isotopes in Aotearoa and abroad. Current provenancing methods in Aotearoa rely heavily on trace elements and light stable isotopes (δ2H, δ15N, δ18O, δ13C) to predict region-of-origin. The information provided by light isotopes and trace elements are useful for excluding potential regions of origin from consideration, but predictions can be further constrained if combined with other geologically derived isotope systems, like 87Sr/86Sr [37,89]. Future provenancing projects in Aotearoa should implement a multi-isotope approach that uses 87Sr/86Sr alongside other light stable isotopes to produce both accurate and precise region-of-origin predictions.

Sample preparation and analysis.

S1.1. Aotearoa Plant Sample Preparation. S1.2. Aotearoa Topsoil Sample Preparation. S1.3. Collected Plant and Topsoil MC-ICP-MS Analysis. S1.4. Additional Plant and Topsoil Preparation and Analysis. S1.5. Cow Milk Sample Preparation and Analysis. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Random forest model and auxiliary variables.

S2 Table 1. Geological and climatic variables used in random forest regression. D = discrete variable; C = continuous variable. S2 Table 2. “Toprock” Category (#1–67) Descriptions. S2 Fig 1. The top performing covariate “Toprock” selected by VSURF package. The 67 toprock principal surface lithology types have been simplified but all types are detailed in S2 Table 2. Data sourced from LRIS (https://lris.scinfo.org.nz/layer/48065-nzlri-rock/; 2010) [S5.18] and GNS (fault lines shapefile) [S5.20]. The “toprock” shapefile does not include data for Rakiura (Stewart Island) or Wharekauri (Chatham Islands). (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr Isoscape–Color Version.

S3 Fig 1. Bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape (color version). The highest 87Sr/86Sr ratios are depicted in blue and the lowest are shown in purple. The bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr isoscape (R2 = 0.53, RMSE = 0.00098) demonstrates the predicted 87Sr/86Sr values, ranging from 0.70567 to 0.71118, for the entire country including the Chatham Islands. Figure developed in ArcGIS Pro using a coastlines feature layer (sourced from Natural Earth) and projected to NZTM 2000. (PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Aggregated 87Sr/86Sr data.

Excel = “S4_BioSrData”. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Cow milk sample predictions.

PDF = “S5_CowMilkSamplePredictions”. Cow Milk Sample Predictions—Top 33% Posterior Probabilities. Regions highlighted in blue represent the top 33% of areas predicted as potential regions-of-origin using bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr where values “1” = Likely Origin and “2” = Unlikely Origin. The box in top left shows the area surrounding the cow milk sample’s actual place-of-origin marked by yellow circle. The hillshade layer was created using a GNS DEM 8m shapefile. (PDF) Click here for additional data file.

References.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present. 16 Nov 2021
PONE-D-21-33406
A bioavailable strontium (87Sr/86Sr) isoscape for Aotearoa New Zealand: Implications for food forensics and biosecurity
PLOS ONE Dear Ms Kramer, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. I have now received two reviews and I am pleased that both reviewers find the manuscript to be of high quality and worthy of publication. There are some changes that both of the reviewers suggest---Reviewer 2 in particular provides detailed comments and recommends some re-structuring of the text, includes some additional references that would be helpful to include, and also poses some useful questions about how provenance can be applied in the use of strontium isotopes based upon your data from Aotearoa New Zealand. So I would ask that you study the reviewer comments and I invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 31 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Lee W Cooper, Ph.D. Section Editor, Biogeochemistry PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. In your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the permits you obtained to collect samples for the present study. Please ensure you have included the full name of the authority that approved the field site access and, if no permits were required, a brief statement explaining why. 3. We note that Figures 1, 3, 7 and S1 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright. We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission: a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1, 3, 7 and S1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text: “I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.” Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission. In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].” b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only. The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful: USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/ Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/ USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/# Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/ 4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: This is a very well written manuscript and very well performed study. I have only a handful of minor comments: 1. Line 59: the "18O" font looks strange. 2. Lines 526-528: What is the mechanism by which temperature influences bioavailable Sr isotopes? 3. The word "data" is plural is "becomes" should be "become". Reviewer #2: The authors provide a very well done and much needed contribution to the strontium isotope global literature in the form of a predicted isoscape with validation from Aotearoa. The production of the isoscape is rigorous and follows known best practices in the literature. Most of my comments are relatively minor. My one major question comes with the applicability sourcing using the 33% predictive threshold; while most milk samples did have a nearby highly probably source, the highest density of probable source locations was often on the other side of the country (ex: Cow 19-21)! How can this predictive model be used in a way that is meaningful to unknown samples? I go into more detail on these question in the line-by-line comments below. Overall this is a very strong paper and a dataset worthy of publication. I thank the authors for their diligence and look forward to their revisions. ---- Line 32: “Bioavailable stable and radiogenic…” – This should just read “radiogenic.” There are no stable isotopes of strontium. Also the word ‘ubiquitous’ feels strange here, and I’m not sure what meaning the authors are trying to convey with it. Consider selecting a different word. Lines 52-68: This goes fairly in-depth right off the bat about using isotopes to track the origins of pest insects themselves; while interesting, this is not actually relevant to the focus of the paper, which tests the validity of the isoscape to source products. The discussion of the application to identifying the imported vs “homegrown” nature of pest insects is fine, but belongs in the Discussion section and not as the opening to the paper. You could also move the discussion of the isotopic application into the ‘previous research’ summary beginning on line 82. 111 - Hydrogen and oxygen are used in many places to determine provenance within a regional scale. This has even been done with milk (Vieira Silva et al 2013, Boito et al 2021, links to journals below). The authors are not incorrect about the ambiguity surrounding all the inputs into an oxygen isotope ratio, but that does not mean that it cannot be used at a regional scale. Like strontium, it all depends on the variation present and the patterning of that variation! https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/rcm.9160 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958694613002835?casa_token=ylfxor7hGakAAAAA:jgJdG2Raca2CaCmPbbh2-zwbFpWeo4NiEC_LfMPXJO-mh_9y6kSdQeHD5OnfQn_R5GDHbzsK 129-131 – isn’t this same limitation true of strontium isotope ratios? Without baseline knowledge – something your isoscape is providing here! – you are unable to draw conclusions about provenance. 172 – Isoscapes for Tanzania and Kenya should be included here as well (Janzen et al 2020): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031018220304028?casa_token=d7oU3el2pFEAAAAA:pe1lNFHYhVvwUZAYUi_CJT5r9WnHMmNglGWUoVxAnjxEol-kYVQDWOz94mTh5S37xOk1KLnq 199 – Riparian areas are also shown to influence the values of plants growing near mobile waterways because of the variable values from that water flowing over different isotopic zones (Sillen et al 1998, Hamilton et al 2019). This should also be included in the discussion of possible influences on the isotopic ratio, and discussed in the context of the authors’ collection of samples (were any samples in riparian zones? Could this influence results?) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016703798001823?casa_token=7nWAfydRCjEAAAAA:ihiJezZaSMJUn-CbsWEdghHuUkAD2WY7f13ZK6ZsisCpn5s8aNKDW34gmqkbwlD1D4ZkYCiv https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.23932?casa_token=HXpMWQKHv14AAAAA%3AtCW1VHUbObhoDRlHrkqWv3G435VCxxgsubp89JCXlgVA6Fr_K4aoTkeNIxpYgTpIsS0isyUFquS12g 206 – were samples collected far enough from roads to avoid contamination from dust from vehicles, etc? Also, include information about topical cleaning of samples (were they brushed clean or washed before being dehydrated, for example) or other precautions taken to avoid dust contamination in the measurement. 290 – what is the turnover time for milk production? In other words, how long would cows need to be feeding locally to ensure that the signal within the milk produced is local? 368 – how can the categorical variable of “principal surface lithology type” be inversely correlated with something? How can a categorical variable increase or decrease? Line 400 / Fig 6 – Can you explicitly discuss the source the predicted Sr/Sr value in the paper body? You describe it well in the figure 6 caption as being based on the isoscape and known area of sample collection, but the way it reads in the paper makes it sound like it is a value related to the posterior probabily map somehow. 404 – Line 404 – remove comma after “all” Here is my major question with this particular study. I appreciate the methodology used here, and the assignR function is an excellent analytical choice. However, looking at the provided maps, I have no idea how this information would be useful for an unknown sample in providing provenience information. The metric of “distance to the nearest predicted origin” feels somewhat misleading, given how many high-probability cells there are all over the map, often at much greater densities far away from the true point of origin. Given this, how would this method actually be useful to determining the validity of a product’s stated origin? You discuss that the accuracy goes down while precision goes up using smaller threshholds, but isn’t that exactly what you would expect? Without the precision, how is this technique useful in practice? 427 – Is the accuracy/precision of estimates related to the general heterogeneity of the area? I would image the more heterogenous (geologically) the area is, the more precise the estimate might be, whereas more homogenous areas might have higher accuracy with less precision. Do you see any correlations like this? 526 and 590 – Is there any proposal causal mechanism in the literature to explain MAT impacting strontium ratio? I have never seen this proposed, and can’t think of a reason why temperature alone would change the isotopic composition of an area. It reads here as causal (MAT causes Sr/Sr to change) – is that accurate, or is it merely a correlation observed (because of interaction effects with elevation, age, lithology, etc)? Please be clear. 620 – this would be a good place for your discussion of pests from the introduction! General comments: Is there a specific area that counterfeit products tend to come from? Are there any published isotopic values from these areas? I would love to see a color version of Fig 3! ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: No [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
8 Jan 2022 Please see uploaded "Response to Reviewers" document included with the other revised materials. All comments have been responded to. Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx Click here for additional data file. 11 Feb 2022 A bioavailable strontium (87Sr/86Sr) isoscape for Aotearoa New Zealand: Implications for food forensics and biosecurity PONE-D-21-33406R1 Dear  Robyn, Thank you for re-submitting your manuscript. I am not sure why it took some time to get back to me since you submitted it at the end of December, but I've had a chance to look at the changes you have made in response to the reviewer recommendations. I think you have more than satisfied the needs to improve the manuscript in response to the reviewer recommendations, and I'm  pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication. It will be formally accepted for publication once it meets any outstanding technical requirements as judged by the editorial office. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing any additional required amendments that are judged necessary by the editorial office. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. I have been told that PLOS staff (Natasha MacDonald; nmcdonald@plos.org) is interested in possibly helping with publicizing your results upon publication. If your institution will be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 14:00 USA Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Thank you again for your efforts to present your results in PLOS ONE. Kind regards, Lee W Cooper, Ph.D. Section Editor PLOS ONE 17 Feb 2022 PONE-D-21-33406R1 A bioavailable strontium (87Sr/86Sr) isoscape for Aotearoa New Zealand: Implications for food forensics and biosecurity Dear Dr. Kramer: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Lee W Cooper Section Editor PLOS ONE
  42 in total

1.  A test of geographic assignment using isotope tracers in feathers of known origin.

Authors:  Michael B Wunder; Cynthia L Kester; Fritz L Knopf; Robert O Rye
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Applying the principles of isotope analysis in plant and animal ecology to forensic science in the Americas.

Authors:  Lesley A Chesson; Janet E Barnette; Gabriel J Bowen; J Renée Brooks; John F Casale; Thure E Cerling; Craig S Cook; Charles B Douthitt; John D Howa; Janet M Hurley; Helen W Kreuzer; Michael J Lott; Luiz A Martinelli; Shannon P O'Grady; David W Podlesak; Brett J Tipple; Luciano O Valenzuela; Jason B West
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Corruption, development and governance indicators predict invasive species risk from trade.

Authors:  Evan C Brenton-Rule; Rafael F Barbieri; Philip J Lester
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios in human hair are related to geography.

Authors:  James R Ehleringer; Gabriel J Bowen; Lesley A Chesson; Adam G West; David W Podlesak; Thure E Cerling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A global carbon and nitrogen isotope perspective on modern and ancient human diet.

Authors:  Michael I Bird; Stefani A Crabtree; Jordahna Haig; Sean Ulm; Christopher M Wurster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Import volumes and biosecurity interventions shape the arrival rate of fungal pathogens.

Authors:  Benjamin A Sikes; Jennifer L Bufford; Philip E Hulme; Jerry A Cooper; Peter R Johnston; Richard P Duncan
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 7.  Recent applications of isotope analysis to forensic anthropology.

Authors:  Eric J Bartelink; Lesley A Chesson
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2019-02-17

8.  Isotopes and trace elements as natal origin markers of Helicoverpa armigera--an experimental model for biosecurity pests.

Authors:  Peter W Holder; Karen Armstrong; Robert Van Hale; Marc-Alban Millet; Russell Frew; Timothy J Clough; Joel A Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Isotope values of the bioavailable strontium in inland southwestern Sweden-A baseline for mobility studies.

Authors:  Malou Blank; Karl-Göran Sjögren; Corina Knipper; Karin M Frei; Jan Storå
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Analysing Sr isotopes in low-Sr samples such as single insects with inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry using N2 O as a reaction gas for in-line Rb separation.

Authors:  David Thomas Murphy; Charlotte M Allen; Osama Ghidan; Andrew Dickson; Wan-Ping Hu; Ethan Briggs; Peter W Holder; Karen F Armstrong
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 2.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.