| Literature DB >> 35294443 |
Abdoudramane Sanou1, Kiessoun Konate1,2, Roger Dakuyo1, Kaboré Kabore1, Hemayoro Sama3, Mamoudou Hama Dicko1.
Abstract
This study consisted of the physicochemical, phytochemical and antioxidant characterisation of two varieties of Hibiscus sabdariffa, to evaluate the influence of genetic and environmental factors on these parameters leading to an objective and rigorous classification of our extracts. To this end, calyxes and seeds of the red and white phenotypes were collected in Bobo-Dioulasso, Dano and Nouna respectively in December 2019 and 2020. Principal component analysis showed that physico-chemical and biochemical parameters could potentially be used to discriminate varieties. The calyxes of the sabdariffa variety showed the best physicochemical profile (total phenolics, flavonoids, ascorbic acid), pigments (anthocyanins, chlorophyll) and antioxidant activity (free radical scavenging and SOD activity) while the seeds showed the best carbohydrate, lipid and peroxidation inhibition content. In view of these results, the red phenotype has an interesting nutritional and therapeutic potential. It could therefore be interesting candidate in the pharmaceutical and food industries.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35294443 PMCID: PMC8926261 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261924
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Experimental design.
Physics and proximate, major nutriments, pigments contents.
| Parameters | Characteristics | CS | CA | GS | GA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physics | pH | 2.6 ± 0.3 a | 2.36 ± 0.27a | 5.87 ± 0,2 b | 5.78 ± 0.3 b |
| Humidity | 6.68 ± 0.03 a | 6.99 ± 0.02 a | 7.07 ± 0,01 a | 8.23 ± 0.04 a | |
| Total ash (g/100g) | 7.72 ± 0.38 a | 7.95 ± 1.17 a | 6.05 ± 1.17 a | 5.86 ± 2.44 a | |
| Titratable acid (mgEKOH/100g) | 16.83 ± 5.39 a | 42.5± 7.1 b | 18.2 ± 1.74 b | 22.16 ± 3.2 b | |
| L* | 5.04 ±1.2 b | 14.16±2.3 a | 14.43± 1.5 a | 11.627± 28 a | |
| a* | 7.91± 1.2 a | 3.46± 0.9 b | 2.70± 1.0 b | 2.06± 0.5b | |
| b* | 2.40±0.6 c | 9.61± 1.2 a | 7.94± 0.2 b | 7.44± 0.4 b | |
| c* | 8.28± 1.4 a | 10.22± 2.1 a | 8.39± 1.7a | 7.73± 1.2 a | |
| h* | 17.56± 1.2 b | 70.20± 0.8 a | 71.18± 0.7 a | 74.45± 0.8 a | |
| Major nutriments | Total carbohydrates (g/100gMS) | 7.51 ± 1.18 b | 4.60 ± 0.87 c | 12.10 ± 0,5 a | 12.44 ± 1.11 a |
| Total protein (g/100gMS) | 11.96 ± 0,2 a | 11.26 ± 0.3 a | 12.32± 1,8 a | 10.64± 1.68 a | |
| Total lipids (g/100gMS) | 3.29 ± 0,58 b | 3.24 ± 0.59 b | 20.69 ± 1,8 a | 18.80 ± 3.2 a | |
| Energy balance (KJ) | 107.49 ± 5.94 a | 92.6 ± 5.74 a | 283.99 ± 23,72 b | 261.8 ± 35.64 b | |
| Pigments | B-carotène (g/100gMS) | 0.53 ± 0.27 a | 0.32 ± 0.17 a | 0.01 ± 0.01 b | 0.01 ± 0.00 b |
| Lycopène (g/100gMS) | 0.85 ± 0.34 a | 0.19 ± 0.1 b | 0.19 ± 0.65 b | 0.03 ± 0.01c | |
| Chlorophyll (g/100gMS) | 4.12 ± 1.04 a | 3.22 ± 0.95 a | 2.92 ± 0.8 ab | 1.19 ± 0.95 b | |
| Anthocyans (g/100g) | 1.73 ± 0.09a | 0.19 ± 0.02 b | 0.04 ± 0,04 b | 0.02 ± 0.19 b |
Values with similar letters within row are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Fig 2Micronutriments content.
Histograms with the same symbols are not significantly different p<0.05(*); p<0.01 (#).
Fig 3Comparative study of bioactive coumpounds contents.
Fig 4Antioxidents activities of extract Hibiscus sabdariffa.
Values with similar letters within row are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Effect of season on bioactive compounds.
| Parameters | CS | CA | GS | GA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proteins | Saison 1 | 11.96 ± 0.2 a | 11.26 ± 0.3 a | 12.32± 1.8 a | 10.64± 1.68 a |
| Saison 2 | 11.54 ± 2.07a | 11.42 ± 0.7a | 12.86 ± 0.92a | 9.61 ± 0.55a | |
| Carbohydrats | Saison 1 | 1.26 ± 0.23 b | 1.22 ± 0.17b | 0.81 ± 0.07 b | 0.75 ± 0.03 b |
| Saison 2 | 6.48 ± 1.06 a | 7.42 ± 0.17 a | 9.33 ± 0.35 a | 9.29 ± 0.58 a | |
| Total phenolics | Saison 1 | 5.64 ± 10.5 b | 3.93 ± 0,4 b | 3.62 ± 1.0b | 2.50 ± 0.5 b |
| Saison 2 | 14.61 ± 2.12 a | 12.56 ± 2.4 a | 11.95 ± 1.7 | 5.2 ± 1.2 a | |
| Flavonoids | Saison 1 | 2.01 ± 0.95 b | 1.26 ± 0.14 a | 0.77 ± 0.65 a | 0,33 ± 0.20 a |
| Saison 2 | 4.4 ± 0.2 a | 1.9 ± 0.2 a | 0.92 ± 0.43a | 0.21± 0.1 a | |
| IC50 (DPPH) | Saison 1 | 1.43± 0.1 b | 1.42 ± 0.23 b | 1.33 ± 0,31 b | 1.3 ± 0.2 b |
| Saison 2 | 1.85 ± 0.2 a | 2.3 ± 0.25 a | 2.5 ± 0,2 a | 2.4 ± 0.2 a |
Values with similar letters within row are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Effect of production areas on bioactive compounds.
| Bobo Dioulasso | Dano | Nouna | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | CS | 6.55 ± 1.2a | 6.52 ±0.9 a | 5.36 ± 1.9 a |
| CA | 3.50 ± 0.5 ab | 4.00 ± 0.8 a | 3.28 ±1.2 a | |
| Phenolics | GS | 3.31 ±1.7ab | 4.13 ± 0.3 a | 2.83 ±0.8 a |
| GA | 2.46 ± 0.3 ab | 2.45 ± 0.2 a | 2.55 ± 0.4 a | |
| Flavonoïds | CS | 0.84 ±0.2 a | 0.82 ± 0.5 a | 0.66 ± 0.4 a |
| CA | 0.33 ± 0.1 a | 0.37 ± 0.04 a | 0.29 ± 0.02 a | |
| GS | 2.23 ± 0.2 a | 2.22 ± 0.1 a | 1.86±0.2 a | |
| GA | 1.27±0.3 a | 1.31 ±0.3 a | 1.21 ± 0.2 a | |
| Tanins | CS | 0.12 ±0.3 a | 0.09 ±0.2 a | 0.05 ±0.3 a |
| CA | 0.07 ± 0.2 a | 0.06 ±0.02 a | 0.03±0.2a | |
| GS | 0.06±0.1 b | 0.08±0.2 ab | 0.09 ±0.1 a | |
| GA | 0.13±0.5 a | 0.02 ± 0.2b | 0.05±0.4 ab | |
| Anthocyanins | CS | 1.89 ±0.2 a | 1.80 ±0.3 a | 1.52 ±0.5 a |
| CA | 0.04 ±0.3 a | 0.02 ±0.1 a | 0.01±0.05a | |
| GS | 0.03 ± 0.15 a | 0.05 ± 0.3 a | 0.02 ± 0.1 a | |
| GA | 0.05 ± 0.2 a | 0.04 ± 0.2a | 0.05±0.1 a |
Values with similar letters within row are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05.
Fig 5Principal Component Analysis (PCA).