| Literature DB >> 35294324 |
Ekambaram Gayathiri1, Palanisamy Prakash2, Kuppusamy Selvam2, Mukesh Kumar Awasthi3, Ravindran Gobinath4, Rama Rao Karri5, Manikkavalli Gurunathan Ragunathan6, Jayaprakash Jayanthi6, Vimalraj Mani7, Mohammad Ali Poudineh8, Soon Woong Chang9, Balasubramani Ravindran9.
Abstract
Increased industrialization demand using synthetic dyes in the newspaper, cosmetics, textiles, food, and leather industries. As a consequence, harmful chemicals from dye industries are released into water reservoirs with numerous structural components of synthetic dyes, which are hazardous to the ecosystem, plants and humans. The discharge of synthetic dye into various aquatic environments has a detrimental effect on the balance and integrity of ecological systems. Moreover, numerous inorganic dyes exhibit tolerance to degradation and repair by natural and conventional processes. So, the present condition requires the development of efficient and effective waste management systems that do not exacerbate environmental stress or endanger other living forms. Numerous biological systems, including microbes and plants, have been studied for their ability to metabolize dyestuffs. To minimize environmental impact, bioremediation uses endophytic bacteria, which are plant beneficial bacteria that dwell within plants and may improve plant development in both normal and stressful environments. Moreover, Phytoremediation is suitable for treating dye contaminants produced from a wide range of sources. This review article proves a comprehensive evaluation of the most frequently utilized plant and microbes as dye removal technologies from dye-containing industrial effluents. Furthermore, this study examines current existing technologies and proposes a more efficient, cost-effective method for dye removal and decolorization on a big scale. This study also aims to focus on advanced degradation techniques combined with biological approaches, well regarded as extremely effective treatments for recalcitrant wastewater, with the greatest industrial potential.Entities:
Keywords: Phytoremediation; degradation textile; dyes remediation; microbes; plant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35294324 PMCID: PMC9208495 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2049100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 6.832
Figure 1.Summary of research papers published between 2000 to 2021 on dye bioremediation.
Natural dyes obtained from Plant and Animal
| Source | Natural Dyes | Derived from | Colorant | Chemical Structure | Application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant | Alkannin | Purple | Cosmetics, soaps | ||
| Plant | Brazilin | Bright red | Cotton, wool | ||
| Plant | Rhamnetin | Yellow to green organic colorant | Textile industry | ||
| Plant | Quercetin | Bright yellow | Textile industry | ||
| Plant | Chamomile | Dark yellow | Textile industry | ||
| Plant | Chestnut | Brown | Textile industry | ||
| Plant | Cutch | Reddish brown | All Dyeing Industries | ||
| Animal | Cochineal | Red | Food and in lipstick | ||
| Animal | Lac | Bright red | Textile industries | ||
| Animal | Tyrian | Reddish-purple | Textile industries | ||
| Animal | Sepia | Reddish-brown | Pigment in Writing, Art and Cosmetics |
Figure 3.Textile dyes classification according to their structure °.
Figure 2.Methods in Dye treatment in Industries.
Figure 4.Classification of Bioremediation.
Plant in remediation of dyes
| Plant | Dyes | Structure and formula weight | Mechanism | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triarylmethane dye | 80% Efficiency in removing MB and CR dyes from inorganic dye | [Navjeet Kaur 2021.] | ||||
| Benzo α pyrene and chrysene | These species remove hazardous hydrocarbons from effluents dumped region producing a high microbial activity | [Campbell S, et al. (2006), Sanjeev Kumar 2017] | ||||
| 3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid, n-propanol | Improved degradation of tyrosinase, and 2,6-DCIP reductase | [Kabra, A.N 2011] | ||||
| Reactive Red 2 | Potential species for the removal of Phenol, indophenol reductase | [Kagalkar, A.N 2010] | ||||
| Remazol Red RB-133 | Improvement in the activity of oxidase, myeloperoxidase, veratryl methanol monoxide & methylene reductase. | [Khandare, R.V. 2011a] | ||||
| Brilliant Blue G | Laccase, Veratryl alcohol oxidase tyrosinase, and lignin activity were determined | [Watharkar, A. et al. 2014] | ||||
| Reactive Red 141 | Removal of 2,6- DCPIP reductase | [Adki, V.S 2012] | ||||
| Direct Yellow DY106 | Extracted peroxidase | [Boucherit, N et al. 2013] | ||||
| Reactive Blue 172 | Increased activity of lignin oxidase, tyrosinase and DCPIP reductase | Khandare, R.V et al. 2011a | ||||
| Basic Violet 10 | Achieved maximum adsorption level | Kooh, M.R.R 2016 | ||||
| Direct Red 28 | Maximum adsorption of MB and CR | Babalola, J. O., et al. 2016 | ||||
| Allura red AC | peroxidase activity | Zheng, Z., et al. (2000) | ||||
| Reactive black 5 | 50% dye removed in the adsorption | Saba, B., et al. 2015 | ||||
| Malachite Green | Decrease in the BOD, COD and ADMI values | Anuradha N. Kagalkar et al. 2011 | ||||
Plant Microbe synergism in remediation of dyes
| Plant/Microbe synergism | Dyes | Structure and formula weight | Mechanism | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Red 81 | Root help in adsorption of 2,6-DCIP reductase | [Khandare, R.V., 2013] | ||
| Reactive Blue 19 | 98% sorbent rate of flavin reductase activity |
Macrophytes in remediation of dyes
| Plant/Microbe synergism | Dyes | Structure and formula weight | Mechanism | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naphthol Blue Black | Amine groups help in binding the dye | [Daneshvar, E et al. (2012)] | ||
| Phenoxyalkanoic acid | The biosorbent strength was determined to be 22.3 mg/g | [Garge MS (2012)] | ||
| Reactive Red 198 | At pH 2, the biomass had a maximal sorption capacity of 94%. | |||
| yellow 2 G | 63–69% of the dark color were removed from azo dye | Aravindhan R, et al. (2007) | ||
| Ramazol golden yellow RNL (Reactive Orange 107) | For all dyes, the obtaining maximum optimal absorption capacity is at a pH of 2.0 | Aksu Z, et al. (2003) | ||
| Reactive Blue 5 | The optimum dye degradation effect was recorded at pH range of 6–9 and varied dye concentrations (5–50 mg/L) | Ogugbue, C.J., (2012) |
Fungi used in remediation of dyes
| Plant/Microbe synergism | Dyes | Structure and formula weight | Mechanism | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bisphenol | Root help in adsorption of 2,6-DCIP | Chairin, T (2013) | |||
| Reactive blue 49 | Combined adsorption capacity was 72.86mgg− 1 | [Akar, S.T et al. (2009a)] | |||
| Direct Yellow 86 | Metal-complex dye biosorbed by 85.4-mg dye g − 1 | Aksu, Z., et al. (2010) | |||
| Methylene blue | Kalyani, P., et al. (2017) | ||||
| Reactive Yellow 3 | While nourished with 1% sucrose, the strain destrain the discharge at initial pH | Xian-Chun Jin. et al. (2007) | |||
| 4-Nitrotoluene | Capability of partly or effectively degrading recalcitrant organic contaminants | Barr D. P et al. (1994) | |||
| Indigo carmine | Laccase was the enzyme responsible for dye degradation | Wong, Y. (1999) | |||
Bacteria/ Bacteria Consortium used in the remediation of dyes
| Plant/Microbe synergism | Dyes | Structure and formula weight | Mechanism | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acid Orange 7 | Even at 200 mg/l, 90 percent decolorization may be accomplished after 16 hours | [Joshi T, et al. (2008)] | ||
| Acid Blue 277 (Tectilon Blue) | Dye degradation is accurately simulated during a 24-hour at a response rate of 200–1000 mg/l | [Walker et al. (2000)] | ||
| Acid Black 210 | Under optimized conditions, 100 mg/L dye degrades in 90 minutes | Agrawal et al. (2014) | ||
| Reactive Violet 5 R | Within 37 hours, it demonstrated a 94 percent decolorization ability in alkaline pH | Moosvi, S et al. (2005) | ||
| Direct Blue-15 | Most capable of decolorizing at alkaline pH at 30°C | Kumar K (2009) | ||
| Scarlet R | After 3 hours, a decrease of over 90% in TOC and COD | Saratale RG et al. (2009) | ||
| The CODCr elimination rate, the BOD5/CODCr value, and the synthesis of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) all were almost 95% successful | Liu, N., et al. (2016) | |||
| Acid Red 119 | Exhibited decolorisation up to 1000 ppm of AR-119 dye after 7 days of observation | Dave SR, Dave RH (2009) | ||
| Reactive R111 | Within 5.5 hours, 91 percent of 300 ppm dye was decolorized across a wide pH range | Sheth, N.T., et al. (2009) | ||
| Bromaminic Acid | 98% within 24 h even for the initial concentration greater than 1000 mg l-1 | Fan L et al. (2008) | ||
| Acid Black 172 | Adsorption of dyes reached a maximum of 2.98 mmol/g biomass | Du LN, et al. (2012) | ||
| orange 16 | Exhibit satisfactory ADMI reduction | Mishra, S., et al. (2020) | ||
| Reactive red 180 | Decoloration (96%) | Wang (2009) | ||
| Brilliant Green dye | Following 24 hours of treatment, 81.14 percent of the dye has been removed, and after 96 hours, 100 percent of the dyes were removed | Zabłocka-Godlewska, et al. (2015) | ||
| Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) | After 48 hours, over 80% of dye removal was seen | John J, et al. (2020) | ||
| Methyl red | Methyl red has a specific outcome of 0.27 mol min1 mg1 | Eslami (2016); Cao (2017) |
Figure 5.Protocol to be followed to achieve remarkable dye biodegradation.