| Literature DB >> 35292681 |
Nan Zhou1, Ruixue Dou1, Xichao Zhai2, Jingyang Fang1, Jiajun Wang1, Ruiqing Ma2, Jingxu Xu3, Bin Cui4, Lei Liang5.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to predict the preoperative pathological grading and survival period of Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) by establishing models, including a radiomics model with greater omental caking as the imaging observation index, a clinical model including clinical indexes, and a combined model of these two. A total of 88 PMP patients were selected. Clinical data of patients, including age, sex, preoperative serum tumor markers [CEA, CA125, and CA199], survival time, and preoperative computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed. Three models (clinical model, radiomics model and combined model) were used to predict PMP pathological grading. The models' diagnostic efficiency was compared and analyzed by building the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Simultaneously, the impact of PMP's different pathological grades was evaluated. The results showed that the radiomics model based on the CT's greater omental caking, an area under the ROC curve ([AUC] = 0.878), and the combined model (AUC = 0.899) had diagnostic power for determining PMP pathological grading. The imaging radiomics model based on CT greater omental caking can be used to predict PMP pathological grading, which is important in the treatment selection method and prognosis assessment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35292681 PMCID: PMC8924207 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08267-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Patient selection flow chart.
Figure 2The CT ROI area of the greater-omental caking. (a) A 37-year-old man with low-grade PMP; the red curve shows greater omental caking. (b) A 62-year-old woman with high-grade PMP; the red curve shows greater omental caking.
Characteristics of all patients and logistic analysis results of clinical factors.
| Characteristics | Low-grade | High-grade | Univariate logistic analysis | Multivariate logistic analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p value | OR (95% CI) | p value | OR (95% CI) | |||
| No.of patients, n | 60 | 28 | ||||
| 0.356 | 0.650 (0.261–1.622) | 0.256 | 0.535 (0.182–21.573) | |||
| Male | 32 | 12 | ||||
| Female | 28 | 16 | ||||
| Age, y | 58.3 ± 11.3 | 57.4 ± 13.6 | 0.818 | 0.995 (0.957–1.036) | 0.982 | 1.001 (0.955–1.048) |
| CEA (ng/ml) | 154.9 ± 224.8 | 121.9 ± 205.2 | 0.543 | 0.999 (0.997–1.002) | 0.300 | 0.999 (0.996–1.001) |
| CA-199 (U/ml) | 554.5 ± 1682.8 | 1527.9 ± 3551.6 | 0.104 | 1.000 (1.000–1.000) | 0.225 | 1.000 (1.000–1.000) |
| CA-125 (U/ml) | 111.5 ± 111.0 | 211.7 ± 230.8 | 0.006* | 1.006 (1.002–1.011) | 0.012 | 1.006 (1.001–1.011) |
| Median survival (range), d | 750(90–2040) | 615(30–2100) | ||||
AUC results of the combined clinical, radiomics, and clinical-radiomics models for predicting the pathological grading of PMP.
| Clinical model | Radiomics model | Clinical-radiomics combined mode | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training set | Validation set | Training set | Validation set | Training set | Validation set | |
| AUC | 0.64 | 0.62 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.90 |
| (95% CI) | (0.505–0.764) | (0.491–0.756) | (0.812–0.972) | (0.505–0.764) | (0.505–0.764) | (0.505–0.764) |
| Accuracy | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.83 |
| Sensitivity | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
| Specificity | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
Figure 3Comparison of ROC curves for the three models’ differentiation for predicting pathological grading.
Figure 4Nomogram of the combined model for predicting the risk of high pathological grade.
Figure 5Decision curves of the combined clinical, radiomics, and clinical-radiomics models for predicting pathological grading.
Figure 6The survival probability of high-grade PMP and low-grade PMP.