| Literature DB >> 35292004 |
Zhao-Lin Teng1, Xiong-Gang Yang1, Xiang Geng2, Yan-Jie Gu3, Ran Huang3, Wen-Ming Chen3, Chen Wang1, Li Chen1, Chao Zhang1, Maimaitirexiati Helili1, Jia-Zhang Huang1, Xu Wang1, Xin Ma4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to develop a novel dynamic measurement technique for testing the material properties and investigating the effect of continuous compression load on the structural and mechanical properties of human heel pad during actual gait.Entities:
Keywords: Contact-pressure plate; Continuous loading; Dual fluoroscopic system; Viscoelastic properties
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35292004 PMCID: PMC8925218 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05197-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Diagram of the equipment consisted of two orthogonally placed fluoroscopes and dynamic foot-ground contact force plate embedded in the custom gait platform
Fig. 2A representative stress-strain curve depicting a cycle of loading and unloading. The energy dissipation was defined as the area between the loading and unloading curves, and the energy dissipation rate was defined as the ratio between energy dissipation and area under loading curve. The point with maximal stress and strain in stress-strain curve represents the peak stress and peak strain. In this individual subject, the peak strain, peak stress and energy dissipation rate were 70.0%, 162.95 kPa and 34.13%, retrospectively
Summaries of the material properties of plantar soft tissue at heel
| Properties | Time zero | Following continuous loading | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left side | Right side | Combined | Left side | Right side | Combined | |
| Primary thickness (mm) | 15.43 (9.60 ~ 16.73) | 15.26 (9.89 ~ 16.36) | 15.40 (9.60 ~ 16.73) | 15.35 (9.65 ~ 16.70) | 15.10 (9.90 ~ 16.35) | 15.24 (9.65 ~ 16.70) |
| Peak strain | 0.68 (0.67 ~ 0.73) | 0.70 (0.69 ~ 0.73) | 0.70 (0.67 ~ 0.73) | 0.69 (0.68 ~ 0.72) | 0.70 (0.65 ~ 0.72) | 0.70 (0.65 ~ 0.72) |
| Peak stress (kPa) | 141.41 (98.74 ~ 146.88) | 156.30 (145.10 ~ 196.40) | 145.47 (98.74 ~ 196.73) | 145.80 (101.20 ~ 160.10) | 156.50 (116.20 ~ 178.60) | 147.30 (101.20 ~ 178.60) |
| Young’s modulus (kPa) | 170.70 (130.50 ~ 202.20) | 199.90 (158.60 ~ 266.40) | 185.20 (130.5 ~ 266.40) | 180.90 (129.1 ~ 197.80) | 204.20 (135.70 ~ 251.20) | 184.20 (129.10 ~ 251.20) |
| Viscous modulus (kPa۰s) | 41.00 (21.13 ~ 59.79) | 42.62 (11.39 ~ 75.69) | 42.03 (11.39 ~ 75.69) | 13.20 (10.25 ~ 29.10) | 22.31 (12.89 ~ 46.56) | 15.39 (10.25 ~ 46.56) |
| EDR (%) | 23.03 (15.82 ~ 44.25) | 25.01 (12.62 ~ 59.24) | 24.28 (12.62 ~ 59.24) | 20.35 (10.74 ~ 46.65) | 21.20 (13.45 ~ 63.57) | 20.83 (10.74 ~ 63.57) |
The data were presented with the median values as well as the minimum-to-maximum ranges
Fig. 3Standardized paired box plot comparing the structural and mechanical properties before and after continuous loading. Following continuous compressive loading, the viscous constant was significantly deceased (p < 0.01**)
Fig. 4The correlation matrix for BMI, age, and the properties of heel at time zero. The values displayed in the right-upper triangle represent the Pearson’s correlation coefficients (R values). The lower-left triangle displayes the scatter plots and regression lines. The plots on the diagonal line present the distribution density of the variables in the matrix. P values: .p < 0.100, *p < 0.050, **p < 0.010, ***p < 0.001. BMI: body mass index
Fig. 5The correlation matrix for BMI, age, and the properties of heel following continuous loading. The values displayed in the right-upper triangle represent the Pearson’s correlation coefficients (R values). The lower-left triangle displayes the scatter plots and regression lines. The plots on the diagonal line present the distribution density of the variables in the matrix. P values: .p < 0.100, *p < 0.050, **p < 0.010, ***p < 0.001. BMI: body mass index