Literature DB >> 19232452

Bulk compressive properties of the heel fat pad during walking: a pilot investigation in plantar heel pain.

Scott C Wearing1, James E Smeathers, Bede Yates, Stephen R Urry, Philip Dubois.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Altered mechanical properties of the heel pad have been implicated in the development of plantar heel pain. However, the in vivo properties of the heel pad during gait remain largely unexplored in this cohort. The aim of the current study was to characterise the bulk compressive properties of the heel pad in individuals with and without plantar heel pain while walking.
METHODS: The sagittal thickness and axial compressive strain of the heel pad were estimated in vivo from dynamic lateral foot radiographs acquired from nine subjects with unilateral plantar heel pain and an equivalent number of matched controls, while walking at their preferred speed. Compressive stress was derived from simultaneously acquired plantar pressure data. Principal viscoelastic parameters of the heel pad, including peak strain, secant modulus and energy dissipation (hysteresis), were estimated from subsequent stress-strain curves.
FINDINGS: There was no significant difference in loaded and unloaded heel pad thickness, peak stress, peak strain, or secant and tangent modulus in subjects with and without heel pain. However, the fat pad of symptomatic feet had a significantly lower energy dissipation ratio (0.55+/-0.17 vs. 0.69+/-0.08) when compared to asymptomatic feet (P<.05).
INTERPRETATION: Plantar heel pain is characterised by reduced energy dissipation ratio of the heel pad when measured in vivo and under physiologically relevant strain rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19232452     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  7 in total

1.  A mathematical method for quantifying in vivo mechanical behaviour of heel pad under dynamic load.

Authors:  Roozbeh Naemi; Panagiotis E Chatzistergos; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Reversing the Mismatch With Forefoot Striking to Reduce Running Injuries.

Authors:  Irene S Davis; Tony Lin-Wei Chen; Scott C Wearing
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Sex Differences in Pedobarographic Findings and Relationship between Radiographic and Pedobarographic Measurements in Young Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Seungbum Koo; Sangho Chun; Kyoung Min Lee; Byung Chae Cho; Young-Jun Koo; Dong-Wan Kang; Moon Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05-18

4.  Effect of loading history on material properties of human heel pad: an in-vivo pilot investigation during gait.

Authors:  Zhao-Lin Teng; Xiong-Gang Yang; Xiang Geng; Yan-Jie Gu; Ran Huang; Wen-Ming Chen; Chen Wang; Li Chen; Chao Zhang; Maimaitirexiati Helili; Jia-Zhang Huang; Xu Wang; Xin Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Comparison of material properties of heel pad between adults with and without type 2 diabetes history: An in-vivo investigation during gait.

Authors:  Xiong-Gang Yang; Zhao-Lin Teng; Zhen-Ming Zhang; Kan Wang; Ran Huang; Wen-Ming Chen; Chen Wang; Li Chen; Chao Zhang; Jia-Zhang Huang; Xu Wang; Xin Ma; Xiang Geng
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 6.  Why forefoot striking in minimal shoes might positively change the course of running injuries.

Authors:  Irene S Davis; Hannah M Rice; Scott C Wearing
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 7.179

7.  A Direct Comparison of Biplanar Videoradiography and Optical Motion Capture for Foot and Ankle Kinematics.

Authors:  Sarah E Kessler; Michael J Rainbow; Glen A Lichtwark; Andrew G Cresswell; Susan E D'Andrea; Nicolai Konow; Luke A Kelly
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.