| Literature DB >> 35291468 |
Yuichi Nishikawa1, Kazuhiko Hirata2, Yoshihiro Ito2, Kazuyuki Ueda2, Hiroaki Kimura3.
Abstract
[Purpose] In April 2014, an additional health insurance system aiming to maintain or improve activities of daily living levels was newly established by the Japanese government. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of this new medical system for rehabilitation on patient management (e.g., activities of daily living level and length of hospital stay) in an acute-phase stroke patient ward. [Participants and Methods] All patients were admitted to the stroke patient ward in our hospital and were registered between January 2012 and December 2019. We assessed the differences in the time to initiation of rehabilitation, length of hospitalization, implementation rate of rehabilitation, and Barthel Index between the period before the start of the new medical system (Prior period) and after this system was started (Post period).Entities:
Keywords: Acute-phase; Rehabilitation; Stroke
Year: 2022 PMID: 35291468 PMCID: PMC8918102 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.34.225
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Characteristics of participants
| Pre-period | Post-period | |||||||
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
| n=60 | n=59 | n=65 | n=55 | n=69 | n=75 | n=70 | n=76 | |
| Age, years | 70.1 ± 15.2 | 69.4 ± 15.3 | 69.2 ± 13.4 | 65.2 ± 11.7 | 69.0 ± 13.5 | 72.4 ± 12.9 | 70.0 ± 14.1 | 70.0 ± 12.8 |
| Gender, female, % | 49 | 47 | 51 | 35 | 26 | 45 | 37 | 34 |
| Stroke subtype, % | ||||||||
| Cardioembolism | 30 | 29 | 25 | 22 | 22 | 24 | 14 | 18 |
| Large artery atherosclerosis | 25 | 27 | 33 | 32 | 33 | 33 | 30 | 33 |
| Small artery occlusion | 8 | 8 | 12 | 5 | 10 | 8 | 17 | 20 |
| Other mechanisms | 17 | 15 | 18 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 |
| Hemorrhage | 20 | 20 | 18 | 23 | 30 | 37 | 37 | 32 |
| Implementation rate ofrehabilitation, % | 80.3 | 80.7 | 80.0 | 84 | 94 | 91 | 87 | 88 |
| Time to initiation ofrehabilitation, days | 3.7 ± 2.3 | 3.7 ± 2.6 | 3.6 ± 1.4 | 2.8 ± 1.9 | 2.9 ± 1.9 | 2.8 ± 2.2 | 2.8 ± 3.3 | 2.8 ± 2.0 |
| Δ Barthel Index | 10 (0–100) | 10 (0–100) | 10 (0–100) | 15 (0–90) | 25 (0–85) | 20 (0–100) | 25 (0–100) | 10 (0–100) |
Fig. 1.Comparison of the time to initiation of rehabilitation (A) and ΔBarthel Index (B) between the prior period and post period. The mean and median values were used for the time to initiation of rehabilitation and Δ Barthel Index, respectively.
Fig. 2.Comparison of the length of hospital stay (A), and implementation rate of rehabilitation (B) between the prior period and post period. The mean value was used for the length of hospital stay.