| Literature DB >> 35289962 |
Matteo Matteucci1, Sandro Ferrarese1, Cristiano Cantore1, Vittorio Mantovani1, Giada Pedroni1, Giangiuseppe Cappabianca1, Claudio Corazzari1, Mariusz Kowalewski2,3, Paolo Severgnini4, Roberto Lorusso5, Cesare Beghi1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a well-recognized complication after mitral valve replacement (MVR). However, there are only a few studies analyzing leak occurrence and postoperative results after surgical MVR. The aim of this study was to assess the rate and determinants of early mitral PVL and to evaluate the impact on survival.Entities:
Keywords: mitral regurgitation; mitral valve replacement; paravalvular leak
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35289962 PMCID: PMC9314703 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Card Surg ISSN: 0886-0440 Impact factor: 1.778
Study inclusion and exclusion criteria
| Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
|---|---|
| Adult patients (≥18 years) underwent conventional MVR | Pediatric patients (<18 years old) |
| Isolated or combined MVR | MVR for congenital valve disease or anomalies |
| MVR for native or prosthetic mitral valve disease (redo) | Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery |
| MVR in elective, urgent, or emergent clinical status | Transcatheter MVR |
| Postoperative TTE evaluation before hospital discharge | Patients dead in‐hospital in which at least one postoperative TTE was not available |
Abbreviations: MVR, mitral valve replacement; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography.
Figure 1Proportion of patients undergoing mitral valve replacement for each underlying etiology of mitral valve disease
Baseline characteristics, operative data, and early outcome of the study patients
| Clinical characteristics | Total MVR ( | PVL absent ( | PVL present ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (years) | 68.4 (11.3) | 68.3 (11.4) | 71.5 (5.6) | .27 |
| Age > 65 years | 331 (67) | 317 (66.3) | 14 (87.5) | .133 |
| Female | 275 (55.7) | 264 (55.2) | 11 (68.7) | .41 |
| Male | 219 (44.3) | 214 (44.8) | 5 (31.2) | |
| Mean BSA | 25 (4.8) | 25.1 (4.7) | 24.6 (8.3) | .73 |
| Surgical priority | ||||
| Elective | 437 (88.5) | 424 (88.7) | 13 (81.2) | .59 |
| Urgent/emergency | 57 (11.5) | 54 (11.3) | 3 (18.7) | .60 |
| Previous cardiac surgery | 75 (15.2) | 72 (15.1) | 3 (18.7) | .96 |
| Indication for MVR | ||||
| Stenosis | 139 (28.1) | 135 (28.2) | 4 (25) | .99 |
| Regurgitation | 292 (59.1) | 285 (59.6) | 7 (43.7) | .31 |
| Endocarditis | 63 (12.7) | 58 (12.1) | 5 (31.2) | .061 |
| Annular calcification | 99 (20) | 93 (19.5) | 6 (37.5) | .145 |
| Isolated MVR | ||||
| Yes | 161 (32.6) | 158 (33) | 3 (18.7) | .35 |
| No | 333 (67.4) | 320 (66.9) | 13 (81.2) | |
| Valve type | ||||
| Bioprosthetic | 327 (66.2) | 317 (66.3) | 10 (62.5) | .96 |
| Mechanical | 167 (33.8) | 161 (33.7) | 6 (37.5) | |
| Median valve size (mm) | 28.3 (2.3) | 28.3 (2.3) | 27.7 (2.3) | .32 |
| Type of interrupted suture | ||||
| Everting | 218 (44.1) | 212 (44.3) | 6 (37.5) | .77 |
| Noneverting | 276 (55.9) | 266 (55.7) | 10 (62.5) | |
| Type of atriotomy | ||||
| Single | 478 (96.8) | 463 (96.9) | 15 (93.7) | .98 |
| Biatrial | 16 (3.2) | 15 (3.1) | 1 (6.2) | |
| Mean CPB time (min) | 154.3 (55.5) | 154.3 (55.8) | 155.5 (47.3) | .93 |
| Mean cross‐clamp time (min) | 121.1 (45.3) | 120 (45.4) | 124.4 (42) | .70 |
| Operative mortality | 24 (4.9) | 21 (4.4) | 3 (18.7) | .037 |
Note: Data are shown as number (%) or mean (SD), as appropriate.
Abbreviations: BSA, body surface area; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; MVR, mitral valve replacement; PVL, paravalvular leak.
Figure 2Location (above) and severity (below) of early paravalvular leak (PVL) after conventional mitral valve replacement
Multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess risk factors for early mitral PVL
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Odds ratio (95% CI) |
| |
| Age > 65 years | .133 | 0.26 (0.06–1.18) | .082 |
| Infective endocarditis | .061 | 4.96 (1.45–16.99) | .011 |
| Annular calcification | .145 | 2.86 (0.96–8.51) | .059 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; PVL, paravalvular leak.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival stratified by presence or absence of early paravalvular leak (PVL) after standard mitral valve replacement