Literature DB >> 35289359

Improving protein-ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term.

Liangzhen Zheng1,2, Jintao Meng1,3, Kai Jiang4, Haidong Lan5, Zechen Wang6, Mingzhi Lin2, Weifeng Li6, Hongwei Guo4, Yanjie Wei1, Yuguang Mu7.   

Abstract

Scoring functions are important components in molecular docking for structure-based drug discovery. Traditional scoring functions, generally empirical- or force field-based, are robust and have proven to be useful for identifying hits and lead optimizations. Although multiple highly accurate deep learning- or machine learning-based scoring functions have been developed, their direct applications for docking and screening are limited. We describe a novel strategy to develop a reliable protein-ligand scoring function by augmenting the traditional scoring function Vina score using a correction term (OnionNet-SFCT). The correction term is developed based on an AdaBoost random forest model, utilizing multiple layers of contacts formed between protein residues and ligand atoms. In addition to the Vina score, the model considerably enhances the AutoDock Vina prediction abilities for docking and screening tasks based on different benchmarks (such as cross-docking dataset, CASF-2016, DUD-E and DUD-AD). Furthermore, our model could be combined with multiple docking applications to increase pose selection accuracies and screening abilities, indicating its wide usage for structure-based drug discoveries. Furthermore, in a reverse practice, the combined scoring strategy successfully identified multiple known receptors of a plant hormone. To summarize, the results show that the combination of data-driven model (OnionNet-SFCT) and empirical scoring function (Vina score) is a good scoring strategy that could be useful for structure-based drug discoveries and potentially target fishing in future.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  machine learning; molecular docking; reversal virtual screening; scoring function; virtual screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35289359      PMCID: PMC9116214          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   13.994


  52 in total

1.  The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

Authors:  M A Harris; J Clark; A Ireland; J Lomax; M Ashburner; R Foulger; K Eilbeck; S Lewis; B Marshall; C Mungall; J Richter; G M Rubin; J A Blake; C Bult; M Dolan; H Drabkin; J T Eppig; D P Hill; L Ni; M Ringwald; R Balakrishnan; J M Cherry; K R Christie; M C Costanzo; S S Dwight; S Engel; D G Fisk; J E Hirschman; E L Hong; R S Nash; A Sethuraman; C L Theesfeld; D Botstein; K Dolinski; B Feierbach; T Berardini; S Mundodi; S Y Rhee; R Apweiler; D Barrell; E Camon; E Dimmer; V Lee; R Chisholm; P Gaudet; W Kibbe; R Kishore; E M Schwarz; P Sternberg; M Gwinn; L Hannick; J Wortman; M Berriman; V Wood; N de la Cruz; P Tonellato; P Jaiswal; T Seigfried; R White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  KORP-PL: a coarse-grained knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Karina Dos Santos Machado; Pablo Chacón; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Improving structure-based virtual screening performance via learning from scoring function components.

Authors:  Guo-Li Xiong; Wen-Ling Ye; Chao Shen; Ai-Ping Lu; Ting-Jun Hou; Dong-Sheng Cao
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  Incorporating Explicit Water Molecules and Ligand Conformation Stability in Machine-Learning Scoring Functions.

Authors:  Jianing Lu; Xuben Hou; Cheng Wang; Yingkai Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks and a Cross-Docked Data Set for Structure-Based Drug Design.

Authors:  Paul G Francoeur; Tomohide Masuda; Jocelyn Sunseri; Andrew Jia; Richard B Iovanisci; Ian Snyder; David R Koes
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Performance of machine-learning scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Maciej Wójcikowski; Pedro J Ballester; Pawel Siedlecki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking.

Authors:  Pedro J Ballester; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Development and evaluation of a deep learning model for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Marta M Stepniewska-Dziubinska; Piotr Zielenkiewicz; Pawel Siedlecki
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold.

Authors:  John Jumper; Richard Evans; Alexander Pritzel; Tim Green; Michael Figurnov; Olaf Ronneberger; Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool; Russ Bates; Augustin Žídek; Anna Potapenko; Alex Bridgland; Clemens Meyer; Simon A A Kohl; Andrew J Ballard; Andrew Cowie; Bernardino Romera-Paredes; Stanislav Nikolov; Rishub Jain; Demis Hassabis; Jonas Adler; Trevor Back; Stig Petersen; David Reiman; Ellen Clancy; Michal Zielinski; Martin Steinegger; Michalina Pacholska; Tamas Berghammer; Sebastian Bodenstein; David Silver; Oriol Vinyals; Andrew W Senior; Koray Kavukcuoglu; Pushmeet Kohli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Application of Computer-Aided Drug Design in Anti-Influenza A Virus Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Dahai Yu; Linlin Wang; Ye Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  New Wine in an Old Bottle: Utilizing Chemical Genetics to Dissect Apical Hook Development.

Authors:  Yalikunjiang Aizezi; Yinpeng Xie; Hongwei Guo; Kai Jiang
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.