Literature DB >> 17073693

Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking.

Ajay N Jain1.   

Abstract

Virtual screening by molecular docking has become established as a method for drug lead discovery and optimization. All docking algorithms make use of a scoring function in combination with a method of search. Two theoretical aspects of scoring function performance dominate operational performance. The first is the degree to which a scoring function has a global extremum within the ligand pose landscape at the proper location. The second is the degree to which the magnitude of the function at the extremum is accurate. Presuming adequate search strategies, a scoring function's location performance will dominate behavior with respect to docking accuracy: the degree to which a predicted pose of a ligand matches experimental observation. A scoring function's magnitude performance will dominate behavior with respect to screening utility: enrichment of true ligands over non-ligands. Magnitude estimation also controls pure scoring accuracy: the degree to which bona fide ligands of a particular protein may be correctly ranked. Approaches to the development of scoring functions have varied widely, with a number of functions yielding similarly high levels of performance relating to the location issue. However, even among functions performing equally well on location, widely varying performance is observed on the question of magnitude. In many cases, performance is good enough to yield high enrichments of true ligands versus non-ligands in screening across a wide variety of protein types. Generally, performance is not good enough to correctly rank among true ligands. Strategies for improvement are discussed.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17073693     DOI: 10.2174/138920306778559395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci        ISSN: 1389-2037            Impact factor:   3.272


  56 in total

Review 1.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  SHEF: a vHTS geometrical filter using coefficients of spherical harmonic molecular surfaces.

Authors:  Wensheng Cai; Jiawei Xu; Xueguang Shao; Vincent Leroux; Alexandre Beautrait; Bernard Maigret
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Customizing scoring functions for docking.

Authors:  Tuan A Pham; Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Bias, reporting, and sharing: computational evaluations of docking methods.

Authors:  Ajay N Jain
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Experimental versus predicted affinities for ligand binding to estrogen receptor: iterative selection and rescoring of docked poses systematically improves the correlation.

Authors:  James S Wright; James M Anderson; Hooman Shadnia; Tony Durst; John A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Theoretical analysis of somatostatin receptor 5 with antagonists and agonists for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Santhosh Kumar Nagarajan; Sathya Babu; Thirumurthy Madhavan
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.943

7.  Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; John J Irwin; Guangqiang Dong; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Further analysis and comparative study of intermolecular interactions using dimers from the S22 database.

Authors:  Laszlo Fusti Molnar; Xiao He; Bing Wang; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Structure-based predictions of activity cliffs.

Authors:  Jarmila Husby; Giovanni Bottegoni; Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.956

10.  Scoring ensembles of docked protein:ligand interactions for virtual lead optimization.

Authors:  Janet L Paulsen; Amy C Anderson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.