Francisco J R Mejías1, Inmaculada P Fernández2, Carlos Rial1, Rosa M Varela1, José M G Molinillo1, José J Calvino2, Susana Trasobares2, Francisco A Macías1. 1. Allelopathy Group, Department of Organic Chemistry, Institute of Biomolecules (INBIO), School of Science, University of Cádiz, Campus CEIA3, C/ República Saharaui, 7, Puerto Real, Cádiz 11510, Spain. 2. Departamento de Ciencia de Los Materiales e Ingeniería Metalúrgica y Química Inorgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Cádiz, C/ República Saharaui, 7, Puerto Real, Cádiz 11510, Spain.
Abstract
The encapsulation of bioactive natural products has emerged as a relevant tool for modifying the poor physicochemical properties often exhibited by agrochemicals. In this regard, natural guaiane-type sesquiterpene lactones isolated from Cynara cardunculus L. have been encapsulated in a core/shell nanotube@agrochemical system. Monitoring of the F and O signals in marked sesquiterpenes confirmed that the compound is present in the nanotube cavity. These structures were characterized using scanning transmission electron microscopy-X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometry techniques, which revealed the spatial layout relationship and confirmed encapsulation of the sesquiterpene lactone derivative. In addition, biological studies were performed with aguerin B (1), cynaropicrin (2), and grosheimin (3) on the inhibition of germination, roots, and shoots in weeds (Phalaris arundinacea L., Lolium perenne L., and Portulaca oleracea L.). Encapsulation of lactones in nanotubes gives better results than those for the nonencapsulated compounds, thereby reinforcing the application of fully organic nanotubes for the sustainable use of agrochemicals in the future.
The encapsulation of bioactive natural products has emerged as a relevant tool for modifying the poor physicochemical properties often exhibited by agrochemicals. In this regard, natural guaiane-type sesquiterpene lactones isolated from Cynara cardunculus L. have been encapsulated in a core/shell nanotube@agrochemical system. Monitoring of the F and O signals in marked sesquiterpenes confirmed that the compound is present in the nanotube cavity. These structures were characterized using scanning transmission electron microscopy-X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometry techniques, which revealed the spatial layout relationship and confirmed encapsulation of the sesquiterpene lactone derivative. In addition, biological studies were performed with aguerin B (1), cynaropicrin (2), and grosheimin (3) on the inhibition of germination, roots, and shoots in weeds (Phalaris arundinacea L., Lolium perenne L., and Portulaca oleracea L.). Encapsulation of lactones in nanotubes gives better results than those for the nonencapsulated compounds, thereby reinforcing the application of fully organic nanotubes for the sustainable use of agrochemicals in the future.
The
guaianolide-type skeleton of sesquiterpene lactones makes these
substances some of the most promising phytotoxic secondary metabolites
employed as natural product-based herbicides.[1−3] The application
of allelopathy is crucial for the sustainable development of agriculture,
and sesquiterpene lactones, which are released by plants to defend
themselves against other plants that are competing for resources,
have played a key role as lead compounds in this field. Cynara cardunculus is a good source of these sesquiterpene
lactones, with aguerin B (1), cynaropicrin (2), and grosheimin (3) (Figure ) being perhaps the most abundant and active
guaianolides. Indeed, their phytotoxicity against Brachiaria [Uruchloa decumbens (Stapf) R.D. Webster] and barnyard
grass (Echinochloa crus-galli L.) even
exceeds that for commercial herbicides such as Logran,[4] and their use against other weeds that infect key crops,
such as wheat or carrots, could solve problems related to soil persistence
and pollutant phenomena that are usually associated with classical
herbicides.[5−8] In addition, the activities of C. cardunculus sesquiterpene lactones are boosted when they are applied together
to fight weeds. As such, this joint action makes them attractive as
it avoids the need for a complex isolation or purification after synthesis.[9]
Figure 1
Structure of sesquiterpene lactones mainly isolated from
the aerial
parts of Cynara cardunculus.
Structure of sesquiterpene lactones mainly isolated from
the aerial
parts of Cynara cardunculus.The physicochemical properties and abundance of
these metabolites
limit their potential and widespread application as a new green herbicide.
The application of low concentrations of natural products to the soil
to fight weeds, in combination with large-scale production, would
reduce the use of classical, nondegradable herbicides and their possible
ingestion by humans as a result of their persistence in edible crops.
However, properties such as bioavailability and soil stability still
need to be improved to obtain the ideal natural weedkiller.In this regard, fully organic encapsulation has become a relevant
technique that has been previously applied in the agricultural field
with satisfactory results. Specifically, polymeric nanoparticles comprising
strigolactone mimics and inuloxin A encapsulated in cyclodextrin have
been employed to fight parasitic plants.[10,11] More recently, nanotubes generated from steroid acid were used to
improve the properties of ortho-disulfides, which
showed potent inhibitory activity against etiolated wheat coleoptiles.[12] This latter method improves biorecognition by
plant cells and offers a larger host space to increase the number
of biomolecules encapsulated.In this work, we have successfully
encapsulated three of the most
important guaianolides from C. cardunculus inside lithocholic acid nanotubes. These organic materials were
characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to determine
the spatial layout of the guaianolides, previously labeled with a
halogen group, inside the nanotube. This procedure was found to improve
the phytotoxicity of the sesquiterpene lactones, which were found
to exhibit a markedly higher inhibition of germination, roots, shoots,
and elongation compared with their nonencapsulated counterparts. In vitro experiments gave excellent results using an undifferentiated
plant model (etiolated wheat coleoptile) and Phalaris
arundinacea, Lolium perenne, and Portulaca oleracea, which infect
most cereal and other relevant crops, such as wheat and carrots, with
relevance all over the world, specifically in North America.[6,7,13]
Experimental
Section
Isolation of Sesquiterpene Lactones
Stem and dry leaves
from C. cardunculus var. scolymus, previously collected in Jerez de la Frontera
(Cadiz, Spain), were powdered using an industrial mill and degreased
with 5 L of n-hexane in an ultrasound bath. A total
of 2.3 kg of dry material was obtained after this process. The bioactive
compounds were then isolated using the method reported by Rial et
al.[4] Finally, 122.2 mg of cynaropicrin
(5.24 × 10–3% yield), 288.6 mg of grosheimin
(1.24 × 10–2% yield), and 90.4 mg of aguerin
B (3.87 × 10–3% yield) were obtained (as wt
% of dry plant material).
Synthesis of 4-Fluorobenzoylaguerin B (4)
30 mg of aguerin B (9.09 × 10–5 mol) was dissolved
in 2 mL of dry pyridine under an inert atmosphere. A total of 1.5
equiv of 4-fluorobenzoyl chloride (1.36 × 10–4 mol, 16.1 μL) was then added to the flask, and the reaction
mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature. The mixture was
subsequently extracted three times with a saturated solution of CuSO4, and the organic phase was washed three times with 0.1 M
NaOH solution. Chromatographic separation was carried out using a
gradient from 0 to 50% Hex/EtOAc. No further purification was needed.
See Table S1 for NMR data. Calculated m/z for [C26H25O6F]Na+ 475.1533, obtained 475.1535. IR (cm–1):
2927.4, 1769.5, 1716.7, 1603.9, 1507.8, 1270.5, 1153.8, 1116.7, 1014.3,
964.4, 855.8, and 768.2. UV (CH3CN), λmax: 231 nm.
Synthesis of Bis(4-Fluorobenzoyl)cynaropicrin
(5)
30 mg of cynaropicrin (8.66 × 10–5 mol) was dissolved in 2 mL of dry pyridine under
an inert atmosphere.
A total of 3 equiv of 4-fluorobenzoyl chloride (2.60 × 10–4 mol, 30.7 μL) was then added to the flask,
and the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature.
The mixture was subsequently extracted three times with a saturated
solution of CuSO4, and the organic phase was washed three
times with 0.1 M NaOH solution. Chromatographic separation was carried
out using a gradient from 0 to 30% Hex/acetone, and then, high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC) was employed to isolate the product at
a retention time of 7.4 min (35% Hex/acetone) (45% yield) using a
Merck-Hitachi system (Tokyo, Japan) with a refractive index detector
(Elite LaChrom L-2490). A semipreparative LiChrospher 10 μm
250–10 Si 60 (Merck) column was employed with a flow rate of
3 mL/min. See Table S2 for NMR data. Calculated m/z for [C33H28F2O8]Na+, 613.1644, obtained 613.1644. IR (cm–1): 2927.7, 1770.2, 1722.3, 1603.2, 1508.2, 1270.3, 1241.1, 1153.6,
1113.7, 854.7, and 768.1. UV (CH3CN), λmax: 241 nm.
Synthesis of 4-Fluorobenzoylgrosheimin (6)
30 mg of groshiemin (1.12 × 10–4 mol) was
dissolved in 2 mL of dry pyridine under an inert atmosphere. A total
of 1.5 equiv of 4-fluorobenzoyl chloride (1.72 × 10–4 mol, 20.3 μL) was then added to the flask, and the reaction
mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature. The mixture was
subsequently extracted three times with a saturated solution of CuSO4, and the organic phase was washed three times with 0.1 M
NaOH solution. Chromatographic separation was carried out using a
gradient from 0 to 50% Hex/EtOAc. No further purification was needed.
See Table S3 for NMR data. Calculated m/z for [C22H21O5F]Na+, 407.1271, obtained 407.1271. IR (cm–1):
2920.2, 2851.4, 1734.2, 1632.8, 1541.7, 1267.3, and 1031.7. UV (CH3CN), λmax: 234 nm.
Synthesis of Lithocholic
Acid Nanotubes
The method
reported by Mejías et al. was used.[12]
Encapsulation of Sesquiterpene Lactones inside Lithocholic Acid
Nanotubes
Three sesquiterpenes, namely, aguerin B (1), cynaropicrin (2), and grosheimin (3), and their respective 4-fluorobenzoyl derivatives, were each encapsulated
using an in situ method. Thus, 30 mg of the guaiane
compound and 60 mg of lithocholic acid (1:2 m/m) were dissolved in
0.1 M NaOH (100 mL), and then, the mixture was stirred while adding
1.0 M HCl to neutral pH (pH ∼7.4). The solution become micellar
and was stirred for a further 24 h. The sample was then dialyzed for
10 min with type-II water using a membrane with a 12,000 Da cutoff.
The solution inside the membrane was recovered and stored at 4 °C
for further study.
Electron Microscopy
Samples were
prepared by placing
one drop of the sample dispersed in type-I water on a Lacey-carbon-coated
300 mesh copper grid. The prepared TEM grid was dried overnight on
filter paper to evaporate the water before being introduced into the
electron microscope.Nanoanalytical information for the sample
was obtained using an FEI Titan Cubed Themis 60–300 microscope
operating at 300 kV. Double-aberration-corrected scanning TEM (STEM)
was equipped with a Super X-G2 X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometer,
thus providing a tool to simultaneously combine spectroscopy and image
signals. The large-area views of the samples were recorded using the
scanning high-angle annular dark field detector. X-ray energy-dispersive
spectrometry (XEDS) analysis was performed acquiring collections of
1300 × 1430 nm size XEDS maps of the C (0.277 keV) and F (0.675
keV) signals. To improve visualization, the elemental maps were postfiltered
using an Average 3, as provided for in Velox software.
NMR Studies
NMR spectra were recorded using an Agilent
INOVA-500 spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm 1H–13C–15N cryoprobe. The 1H (499.772)
and 13C (125.826) NMR spectra were recorded in chloroform-d1
(Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at room temperature. The concentration
of each compound was 1 mg/mL. The chemical shifts are given on the
δ scale and are referred to the residual chloroform (δH
7.26 and δC 77.0 ppm).
Quantification of Encapsulated Compounds
Sesquiterpene
lactones and fluorine derivatives were quantified by ultra-HPLC (UHPLC)–mass
spectrometry (MS) employing a Brucker EVOQ model with triple quadrupole
mass spectrometer. A Phenomenex Kinetex 1.7 μm C18 column (100
× 2.1 mm and a particle size of 1.7 μm) was employed, along
with an APCI ionization source. The method employed was a modification
of multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) published in the literature
to include the fluorinated compound 4-fluorobenzoylgrosheimin.[14] The dependent parameters for each compound and
the internal standard employed (santamarine) were optimized by direct
injection into the mass spectrometer to get a maximum MRM signal intensity
for the ammonium adduct [M + NH4]+. Table shows the precursor
ions and subsequent fragments obtained by MRM analysis, as well as
the collision energy required to achieve these fragmentations.
Table 1
Mass-Charge Ratio and Specific Parameters
for Products and Internal Standards (I.S)
quantifier
ion (m/z)
qualifier
ion (m/z)
compounds
tR (min)
precursor ion (Q1)
product ion (Q3)
E.C (eV)
precursor ion (Q1)
product
ion (Q3)
E.C (eV)
grosheimin
8.36
280
263
3
281
149
10
cynaropicrin
9.40
364
227
10
364
245
5
aguerin B
9.87
348
227
9
348
245
6
4-fluorobenzoylgrosheimin
10.23
402
385
6
402
245
10
santamarine (I.S)
9.67
266
231
6
266
185
10
Each
compound was dissolved in MeOH to get a calibration curve
with concentrations from 50 to 0.1 mg/mL. Santamarine was employed
as the internal standard due to its similar structure and molecular
weight and the fact that it is a sesquiterpene lactone from the Asteraceae
family. Furthermore, this compound is not produced by C. cardunculus. The calibration curve was obtained
as a ratio between the compound peak area and the internal standard
peak area. This curve was fitted to a lineal function weighted by
1/nx (R2 > 0.99),
where
“n” is the number of calibration standards.Sesquiterpene lactones and their derivatives were determined using
the MRM method by comparing the retention times in the chromatograms,
and the most stable transitions were calculated upon direct injection
into the mass spectrometer.
Encapsulation Percentage Calculation
The percentage
of each sesquiterpene lactone inside the nanotubes was determined
by disrupting the supramolecular structure. To release the molecules,
samples were dissolved in methanol and shaken using a vortex mixer.
The solution was then filtered through a 0.22 μm polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE) filter, and this new sample was mixed with 5 μL of the
internal standard (1 mg/mL) before being injected into the UHPLC column.
Solubility Enhancement Calculation
To calculate the
improvement in water solubility for the sesquiterpene lactones and
derivatives, a 1.0 mg/mL solution was prepared in water. These samples
were then filtered through a PTFE 0.22 μm filter, and their
areas in UHPLC were recorded for comparison with the previous calibration
curve measured for MeOH (similar molar extinction coefficient for
water and MeOH).[15] This value (maximum
water solubility of the compound) was compared with the encapsulated
compound using the formula
Etiolated
Wheat Coleoptile Bioassay
All experiments
were carried out following the procedure reported in the literature,
with some minor modifications.[11,12] Sesquiterpene lactones
and their derivatives encapsulated inside lithocholic acid nanotubes
were added diluted in an aqueous phosphate-buffered saline solution
containing 2% sucrose at pH 7.0 at bioactive compound concentrations
of 10, 30, 100, and 300 μM. The concentrations of the bioactive
compound encapsulated within the nanotubes were recalculated by applying
the encapsulation percentage obtained for each compound. A 10 mM buffer
solution was used to avoid osmotic stress. Triticum
aestivum L. cv. Burgos was selected. Logran was employed
as a positive control in the bioassay.
Phytotoxicity Bioassays
Three weed species, namely,
the monocotyledons perennial ryegrass (L. perenne L.), the reed canary grass (P. arundinacea L.), and the dicotyledon common purslane (P. oleracea L.), were evaluated as target plants in this bioassay. L. perenne L. seeds were purchased from Herbiseed
(Reading, UK). P. oleracea L. and P. arundinacea L. were purchased from Cantueso Natural
Seeds (Córdoba, Spain). Bioassays were conducted using Petri
dishes (50 mm diameter) with one sheet of Whatman no. 1 filter paper.
Germination and growth were conducted in aqueous solutions at controlled
pH using 10–2 M of 2-[N-morpholino]ethanesulfonic
acid and 1 M NaOH (pH 6.0). The compounds to be assayed were dissolved
in buffer, while nanotube solutions were just diluted, and test concentrations
of 10–3, 3 × 10–4, 10–4, 3 × 10–5, and 10–5 M were prepared. In the case of nonencapsulated compounds, 0.05%
v/v of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was applied as the solubility enhancer.
Parallel controls were also run as described previously for coleoptile
bioassays. Four replicates containing 20 seeds were used. Treatment,
control, or internal reference solution (1 mL) was added to each Petri
dish. After adding the seeds and aqueous solutions, the Petri dishes
were sealed with Parafilm to ensure closed-system models. Seeds were
further incubated at 25 °C in a Memmert ICE 700 controlled environment
growth chamber. The photoperiod was 24 h of dark for all weeds. Bioassays
took 6 days for perennial ryegrass, 8 days for reed canary grass,
and 4 days for common purslane. After growth, plants were frozen at
−10 °C for 24 h to avoid subsequent growth during the
measurement process. The parameters evaluated (germination rate, root
length, and shoot length) were recorded using a Fitomed system, which
allowed automatic data acquisition and statistical analysis using
the associated software. Data were analyzed statistically using Welch’s
test, with significance fixed at 0.01 and 0.05. The results are presented
as percentage differences with respect to the control. Zero represents
control, positive values represent stimulation, and negative values
represent inhibition.
Results and Discussion
Sesquiterpene Lactone Characterization
Compounds 1, 2, and 3 were
isolated following
the experimental procedure described in the experimental section.
Although these compounds are obtained in only a very low percentage
yield (1.2–3.9·10–3% as wt % of dry
plant material), secondary metabolites such as these are not usually
isolated on a gram-scale. This could allow the broad application of
these compounds on a farm scale. Although enriched fractions were
employed herein to obtain the compounds of interest, it may be possible
to isolate larger quantities from other fractions that also contain
these sesquiterpene lactones. Specifically, according to Rial et al.,[4] aguerin B (1), cynaropicrin (2), and grosheimin (3) can be isolated in 0.48,
5.13, and 0.77% yield with respect to the starting extract, respectively.Bioavailability is one of the most relevant values irrespective
of whether crop or soil application is to be used. In terms of natural
products that could be used as herbicides, the compromise between
lipophilicity and water solubility is an important aspect that determines
the subsequent effect on weeds. Thus, although previous studies published[3] with these kinds of guaiane derivatives have
used DMSO as the codissolvent to achieve their remarkable phytotoxicity
results, this nongreen approach would be difficult to use in agriculture.In order to find a green application of natural products on a larger
scale, researchers in this field tend to follow a limited number of
different approaches. Chemical derivatization of the bioactive products
is perhaps one of the best knowns but can lead to side effects and
a loss of natural properties, which in the case of secondary metabolites
can result in nonpersistence and a low lifetime due to easy recognition
and metabolization by other plants and microorganisms. According to
Macías et al.,[16] maintaining the
natural product as unmodified as possible is the best approach to
generate a new generation of herbicides. As such, encapsulation in
a host for the guaiane-type bioactive compounds, which does not result
in a covalent modification of the natural product, will avoid the
need for any organic solvent.Lithocholic acid (7), a natural steroid, is the host
selected for encapsulation herein due to its ability to self-arrange
into nanotubes. The colloidal properties of the resulting nanotube
structure allow the transport of guest compounds.[17] Moreover, the supramolecular structure exhibited by this
compound is stable in the neutral pH range, thus meaning that problems
related to size toxicity are overcome when the full structure enters
a predominantly acidic cell medium. In addition, this is also a natural
product, thus enhancing the green nature of the resulting agrochemical.
Finally, this structure has been tested previously in phytotoxic bioassays,
which demonstrated its innocuous nature.[12]Going back to the physicochemical properties, Table shows that 1 and 3 have a very low water solubility. The solubility of 1 is slightly lower than that of 3 as the unsaturated
ester increases the lipophilicity, while the hydroxyl and ketone groups
in 3 are more polar. Cynaropicrin (2) shows
the highest water solubility, as expected due to the presence of two
hydroxyl groups, although the value obtained cannot easily be explained.
Table 2
Maximum Concentration of Sesquiterpene
Lactones That Can Be Dissolved in Water at 25 °C
compound
solubility at 25 °C (mg/L)
% RSDa
aguerin B (1)
148.2
4.7
cynaropicrin
(2)
817.3
2.1
grosheimin (3)
106.4
2.5
Relative standard deviation.
Relative standard deviation.According to Table , the water solubility of these sesquiterpene
lactone is higher than
that of others, such as dehydrocostuslactone and costunolide, which
have values of 5.1 and 26.0 mg/L, respectively. Nevertheless, these
higher-solubility values appear to have little effect on phytotoxicity
as the IC50 values for 1, 2,
and 3 are very similar to those for dehydrocostuslactone
and costunolide, despite the solubility values varying 20-fold.[18]Encapsulation in lithocholic acid nanotubes
will allow better transport
of the sesquiterpene lactones to cells, thereby decreasing the amount
of compound that needs to be applied to achieve phytotoxicity and
avoiding the use of organic solvents. However, this is a complex process
that is difficult to follow using standard spectroscopic methods due
to the similar elemental composition of the host and guest (C, H,
and O). As such, differentiating between correct encapsulation in
a core/shell structure and adsorption on the surface of the organic
material is a challenge. In order to ensure successful characterization,
the approach proposed herein involves a quantitative reaction carried
out to introduce a differentiating element, namely, a halogen atom.
Thus, the 4-fluorobenzoyl esters of sesquiterpene lactones isolated
from C. cardunculus were generated
before encapsulation and the fluorine atom was monitored by TEM microscopy
to discern the location of the molecule with regard to the organic
nanotubes (Figure ). These results with fluorinated compounds will be useful for understanding
the behavior of natural compounds when they are encapsulated in similar
structures.
Figure 2
Fluorinated sesquiterpene lactone derivatives 4–6 employed in encapsulation studies, along with the structure of lithocholic
acid (7), the supramolecular structure of which is the
organic nanotube.
Fluorinated sesquiterpene lactone derivatives 4–6 employed in encapsulation studies, along with the structure of lithocholic
acid (7), the supramolecular structure of which is the
organic nanotube.
NMR Characterization
The portion of the 13C NMR spectrum for the fluorinated
fragment shows multiplicity due
to the NMR-active fluorine atom. The nuclear spin of 19F is known to generate doublets for neighboring carbon atoms, the
most remarkable being the C-5 position of the aromatic ring, which
exhibits a coupling constant of more than 250 Hz. Furthermore, the
hydrogen atom alpha to the aromatic ester presents a high shift in
comparison with natural sesquiterpene lactones. In the case of bis(4-fluorobenzoyl)cynaropicrin
(5), H-3 and H-4′ are shifted from 4.55 to 5.76
and from 4.37 to 5.10 ppm, respectively. Oxidation of the hydroxyl
group to form the ester also affects the beta-position, and the H-2
protons are also deshielded, with the same shift being observed for
both derivatives at the C-3 position: 4-fluorobenzoylaguerin B (4) and bis(4-fluorobenzoyl)cynaropicrin (5).With regard to the NMR data for the aromatic ring, when one fluorine
atom is present as a substituent, the ortho-carbon
appears as a doublet (J = 22.0–22.3 Hz), as
do the meta-carbons, although with smaller coupling
constants (J = 9.4–9.5 Hz). The carbon in
the para position exhibits the smallest coupling
constant of around 2.8–3.0 Hz. The 1H NMR spectra
are also affected by the halogen, and the multiplicity becomes much
more complex.
Organic Nanotube Synthesis and Characterization
Once
the derivatives had been obtained, encapsulation was carried out.
Thus, lithocholic acid was dissolved in NaOH solution along with the
fluorinated compound and neutralization was performed by the dropwise
addition of HCl solution. This in situ encapsulation method was designed
to increase the encapsulation percentage as nanotube formation, while
these fluorobenzoyl derivatives present in the solution increase the
possibility of the compound becoming confined during micellar aggregation,
as reported in the literature.[12]Purification by dialyzing the sample allowed the removal of NaCl
crystallites generated as byproducts during nanotube formation. Furthermore,
all the molecules that had not been trapped inside the nanotubes could
be removed after dialysis with a 10,000 Da cutoff. The aqueous solutions
employed in the synthesis were prepared using type-I water in order
to decrease the presence of ions that could increase salt production.
Following the method reported by Mejías et al.,[12] dialysis was performed for 10 min to preserve
the cohesiveness of the supramolecular structure.TEM characterization
was carried out with 4-fluorobenzoylgrosheimin
(4) as an example to provide chemical information about
the spatial location of the fluorine-labeled encapsulated molecule
and host. In particular, the nanotube size was measured directly from
the HAADF low-magnification images, and a size histogram for 89 nanotubes
(Figure ) gave a mean
size diameter of 44.75 ± 9.13 nm (Figure ). This value is in the range of those obtained
for empty nanotubes (49.79 nm) in the literature.[12]Figure shows that the size of 4 is 1.412 × 0.750 nm,
which is much lower than the internal diameter of the nanotube cavity;
therefore, this physical confinement should not alter the size distribution
of the supramolecular structure.
Figure 3
(Top) HAADF image and diameter size distribution
of the nanotubes
encapsulated with fluorinated derivatives. (Bottom) DFT-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)
calculation for the size of 4-fluorobenzoylgrosheimin
(Top) HAADF image and diameter size distribution
of the nanotubes
encapsulated with fluorinated derivatives. (Bottom) DFT-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p)
calculation for the size of 4-fluorobenzoylgrosheiminNanoanalytical studies confirmed that the fluorinated derivatives
had indeed been encapsulated. Thus, the XEDS analysis of the nanotube@4 sample (Figure ) illustrated the spatial distribution of C (0.277 keV) and
F (0.675 keV), with the C, F, and HAADF intensity profile extracted
from the area marked with a red arrow showing that the C and F signals
are anticorrelated. In particular, the F signal is observed when the
C signal is reduced, as would be expected for the empty central part
of the nanotube, thus indicating that the fluorinated derivatives
are located inside the nanotube.
Figure 4
(Left) HAADF image of nanotubes. (Middle)
STEM–XEDS maps
of different elements present in the nanotubes hosting fluorinated
derivatives. (Right) Elemental profile along the area analyzed in
the maps.
(Left) HAADF image of nanotubes. (Middle)
STEM–XEDS maps
of different elements present in the nanotubes hosting fluorinated
derivatives. (Right) Elemental profile along the area analyzed in
the maps.Apart from the fluorine signal,
4-fluorobenzoylgrosheimin (4) contains a higher number
of oxygen atoms than lithocholic
acid. As such, an increase in the oxygen signal in the cavity of the
nanotube, together with the increase in the fluorine signal, must
correlate with the presence of 4 inside the nanotube. Figure , in which the HAADF
profile along nanotubes shows an increase in the oxygen signal whenever
the fluorine signal increases, supports this hypothesis. Both signals
arise when the carbon signal is reduced, thus indicating the start
of the nanotube cavity and confirming the position of the guaiane-type
lactone inside the nanostructure.
Figure 5
(Left) STEM–XEDS maps of C, O,
and F present in the nanotubes
hosting fluorinated derivatives. (Right) Elemental profile along the
area analyzed in maps to correlate C, O, and F signals.
(Left) STEM–XEDS maps of C, O,
and F present in the nanotubes
hosting fluorinated derivatives. (Right) Elemental profile along the
area analyzed in maps to correlate C, O, and F signals.By applying an analogy-type approach, if the fluorinated
derivatives
of natural products fit in the nanotube cavity, sesquiterpene lactones
must show the same behavior due to their structural similarity. As
such, nanosystems were synthesized following the same methodology
as for the fluorinated compounds and the resulting structures were
also confirmed using electron microscopy techniques.Encapsulation
percentage is one of the most relevant values to
be determined for these systems. To determine the quantity of the
sesquiterpene lactones present inside the nanotubes, we disrupted
the micellar structure using an organic solvent. Lithocholic acid
is soluble in methanol, and the addition of this solvent disrupts
the nanotube, thereby releasing the lactones. Table shows that the encapsulation percentages
obtained herein are smaller than those previously reported in the
literature for herbicides. This could be due to the presence of the
hydroxyl group, which may interfere with nanotube formation and stability.
The main self-assembly mechanism accepted by the scientific community
is hydrogen bond formation between the hydroxyl group of one lithocholic
acid and the acid group of a neighboring molecule.[19] Thus, the hydroxyl group in every sesquiterpene lactone
could have interacted with the steroid acid, thereby decreasing the
likelihood of entrapment inside the nanotube.
Table 3
Concentration
of Sesquiterpene Lactones
inside the Nanotubes
compound
concentration (mg/L)
% RSD
% encapsulation
aguerin B (1)
91.6
3.3
30.6
cynaropicrin (2)
119.1
5.7
40.1
grosheimin
(3)
107.5
1.3
32.7
Phytotoxic
Bioassays
An etiolated wheat coleoptile
bioassay was performed to evaluate whether the encapsulation procedure
boosts the biological properties of the main C. cardunculus sesquiterpene lactones. This highly sensitive in vitro plant model
bioassay provides information regarding general phytotoxicity.Figure shows that
aguerin B (1) and cynaropicrin (2) exhibit
remarkable inhibitory activity at 300 μM when tested in aqueous
solution (at pH 7.0) and an organic solvent. The values obtained for
both these substances are better than those obtained for the commercial
herbicide Logran at the same concentration. However, at the next value
tested (100 μM), the bioactivity decreased to almost half of
that for the previous concentration, which is not observed for the
commercial herbicide. Furthermore, the same profile was obtained at
the concentrations of 30 and 10 μM. An inhibitory activity of
40% is obtained for grosheimin (3) when dissolved in
DMSO, thus indicating that this substance cannot be used as an agrochemical
under these conditions.
Figure 6
Etiolated wheat coleoptile bioassays for aguerin
B (1), cynaropicrin (2), and grosheimin
(3)
in aqueous media. Same compounds applying an organic cosolvent (DMSO)
[1 (DMSO), 2 (DMSO), and 3 (DMSO)] and encapsulated in nanotubes also in aqueous media (N@1, N@2, and N@3). A positive control (Logran) and empty nanotubes (N) were also tested.
Etiolated wheat coleoptile bioassays for aguerin
B (1), cynaropicrin (2), and grosheimin
(3)
in aqueous media. Same compounds applying an organic cosolvent (DMSO)
[1 (DMSO), 2 (DMSO), and 3 (DMSO)] and encapsulated in nanotubes also in aqueous media (N@1, N@2, and N@3). A positive control (Logran) and empty nanotubes (N) were also tested.The values obtained for encapsulated sesquiterpene
lactones (NTs)
show much better growth inhibition when the compounds are encapsulated
and dispersed in an aqueous medium compared with the free compound
applied in an organic cosolvent (DMSO). The most remarkable case is
aguerin B (2), which inhibits 100% of growth at 30 μM
and more than 80% of growth at 10 μM. The results obtained for
both 1 and 2 exceed the values observed
for Logran. Although encapsulated grosheimin (3) shows
an astonishing increase in inhibitory activity in comparison with
its aqueous solution, the values obtained are still lower than those
for the other compounds. Table shows a comparison between the IC50 values for
the different formulations. When a guaiane compound is encapsulated
in the organic nanotube, the resulting IC50 value is better
than that obtained when using an organic solvent or buffer. Furthermore,
the NT values for 1, 2, and 3 are twice than those for the commercial herbicide Logran (IC50 = 42.53). It was not possible to calculate the IC50 value for encapsulated aguerin B (1) as lower concentrations
cannot be reached in the bioassay without compromising the nanostructure.
All these values correspond to the boosted properties of the sesquiterpene
lactones as empty nanotubes have no effect on wheat coleoptiles.
Table 4
IC50 Values for Different
Formulations of the Main Sesquiterpene Lactones from Cynara cardunculusa
compound
1 (buffer)
1 (DMSO)
1 (NTs)
2 (buffer)
2 (DMSO)
2 (NTs)
3 (Buffer)
3 (DMSO)
3 (NTs)
IC50 (μM)
84.75
54.36
<10
69.78
73.24
24.79
>300
>300
28.80
S.D (%)
10.59
6.99
10.36
6.47
5.93
8.24
R2
0.9609
0.9796
0.9592
0.9827
0.9788
0.9670
Statistical
analysis with p < 0.05.
Statistical
analysis with p < 0.05.Upon comparing the modulation of the physicochemical
properties
of these guaiane compounds with the bioassay results, it seems clear
that water solubility is insufficient to explain the growth inhibition
of the wheat coleoptile. Table shows that the encapsulation percentage does not reach the
water solubility limit; therefore, this must not be the most relevant
aspect affecting the bioactivity. In this regard, the transport property,
which is directly related to bioavailability, could be a more significant
contribution as a result of the natural product used to form the nanotube.
We believe that lithocholic acid may be easily recognized by exomembrane
proteins and, together with the solubility and side-reaction prevention
of the encapsulated compound, may allow the target to be reached better
than when an organic solvent is used as the vehicle.Phytotoxicity
bioassays for weeds that typically infect the main
cereal and other important crops, especially in North America,[6,7,13] were performed to determine how
nanotube encapsulation affects the main parameters. Germination, root
and shoot length, and geometry were analyzed in the in vitro bioassay
for P. arundinacea, L. perenne L., and P. oleracea L. In common with the wheat coleoptile bioassay, empty nanotubes
were found to be innocuous to weeds; therefore, the phytotoxicity
displayed by the samples is only due to the molecules encapsulated
therein. For every weed, compounds 1, 2,
and 3 were tested in free and encapsulated form and,
as shown in Figure , all nanotube-encapsulated formulations were found to improve the
results for the free form. In the case of L. perenne, the first concentrations of encapsulated compounds present high
inhibition activity (N@1, N@2, and N@3), whereas subsequent concentrations show a quick reduction
in it. In addition, the activity shown by N@1 against
roots, shoots, and germination (Figure S1) exceeds those for both the free compound and the positive control
(Logran).
Figure 7
Effects of aguerin B (1), nanotube@aguerin B (N@1), cynaropicrin (2), nanotube@cynaropicrin
(N@2), grosheimin (3), nanotube@grosheimin
(N@3), and nanotube (N) on roots and shoots
of relevant weeds. Data were analyzed statistically using Welch’s
test, with significance fixed at 0.01 (a) and 0.05 (b).
Effects of aguerin B (1), nanotube@aguerin B (N@1), cynaropicrin (2), nanotube@cynaropicrin
(N@2), grosheimin (3), nanotube@grosheimin
(N@3), and nanotube (N) on roots and shoots
of relevant weeds. Data were analyzed statistically using Welch’s
test, with significance fixed at 0.01 (a) and 0.05 (b).The results for P. arundinacea are
similar, with encapsulated sesquiterpene lactones showing higher inhibition
than their free counterparts. Every activity achieved with the 1000
μM encapsulated form doubled the value achieved for the positive
control. In addition, in the case of roots, even the second concentration
tested exceeded the values obtained for Logran. This trend is similar
to that observed with L. perenne and P. oleracea, thus highlighting the effect of sesquiterpene
lactones on the mechanism regulating root growth.[20] However, the values for shoots show a marked reduction
in inhibition after the dilution process. The germination values observed
for P. arundinacea (Figure S1) are statistically significantly different in the
case of N@1, N@2, and N@3,
as are those for P. oleracea. Furthermore,
germination of this latter weed is not inhibited by Logran, whereas
nanotube encapsulation of C. cardunculus sesquiterpenes allows this parameter to be controlled.The
roots and shoots of P. oleracea are
the most sensitive. Thus, all encapsulated lactones present
inhibition values of almost 100% for root length when the compounds
are encapsulated and more than 60% at the second concentration tested
(300 μM). In the case of the free compound, the activities are
always lower than those for the nanotube-encapsulated compounds. Furthermore,
a similar trend is observed for shoots, with encapsulation enhancing
the already active sesquiterpenes.In conclusion, we have generated
a new kind of herbicide formulation
by using the supramolecular structure of a natural product to encapsulate
different natural guiaiane-type sesquiterpene lactones. The compounds
isolated from C. cardunculus have been
modified to introduce a fluorine atom in the main structure, thus
allowing us to determine their position with respect to the nanotube,
in order to confirm encapsulation, using STEM techniques. XEDS analysis
also confirmed the correct encapsulation upon determining the oxygen
and fluorine profile across the nanotube section, thus showing that
the natural product derivative is hosted in the nanotube cavity.After confirming the presence of the compounds inside the nanotube,
the same procedure was applied to the natural sesquiterpene lactones 1, 2, and 3. These compounds showed
a mean encapsulation percentage of around 30%, which was sufficient
to exceed the phytotoxic values obtained upon dissolution of the free
compounds in organic media. According to the IC50 values
obtained from an in vitro wheat coleoptile assay,
we have generated a nanoformulation method with twice the phytotoxicity
of the commercial herbicide Logran. Furthermore, application of the
nanotube-encapsulated formulations to weeds that commonly infect most
cereal and other relevant crops, such as wheat and carrots, with relevance
all over the world, and specifically in North America, reinforces
the use of this vector to expand allelopathy. Germination and root
and shoot inhibition assays for P. arundinacea, L. perenne, and P.
oleracea showed that the encapsulated C. cardunculus sesquiterpene lactones exhibit higher
activity than the free compounds. Furthermore, they exceed the values
obtained for current herbicides. This will allow the application of
very small quantities of the natural product as a new and green agrochemical
with a low environmental impact.
Authors: Carlos Rial; Benito F García; Rosa M Varela; Ascensión Torres; José M G Molinillo; Francisco A Macías Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Francisco J R Mejías; Susana Trasobares; Miguel López-Haro; Rosa M Varela; José M G Molinillo; José J Calvino; Francisco A Macías Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Francisco J R Mejías; Miguel López-Haro; Lionel C Gontard; Antonio Cala; Mónica Fernández-Aparicio; José M G Molinillo; José J Calvino; Francisco A Macías Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Aurelio Scavo; Carlos Rial; Rosa Maria Varela; José Maria Gonzalez Molinillo; Giovanni Mauromicale; Francisco Antonio Macias Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Carlos Rial; Paula Novaes; Rosa M Varela; José M G Molinillo; Francisco A Macias Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Jesús G Zorrilla; Antonio Cala; Carlos Rial; Francisco J R Mejías; José M G Molinillo; Rosa M Varela; Francisco A Macías Journal: J Agric Food Chem Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 5.279