| Literature DB >> 35284655 |
Yiping Zeng1, Zeshui Xu1, Yu Rao2.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Interventions that significantly reduce dietary sodium intake are anticipated to decrease gastric cancer (GCa) burden. However, the optimal restriction strategies remain unknown at present. This study aims to understand where and to what extent policies modifying sodium consumption change the distribution of GCa burden, and the effects of potential salt reduction strategies in China.Entities:
Keywords: China; cancer burden; dietary‐sodium; health disparities; interventions
Year: 2022 PMID: 35284655 PMCID: PMC8900977 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Sci Rep ISSN: 2398-8835
Figure 1Model schematic. Data on salt consumption are used to calculate the change in sodium intake distributions and as inputs for microsimulation to project health outcomes due to sodium changes
Model parameters and sources
| Parameters | Source |
|---|---|
| Population size of demographic cohorts | The Sixth National Census of China |
| Sodium intake | China Health and Nutrition Survey |
| All‐cause mortality rate | |
| GBD | |
| Gastric cancer mortality rate | GBD |
| Gastric cancer prevalence | GBD/WHO |
| Gastric cancer disability weights | GBD |
| RR gastric cancer given diet high sodium | GBD |
Abbreviation: RR, relative risk.
Calculated value.
Figure 2Cumulative per capita burden of gastric cancer (GCa) due to excess salt consumption in the scenario without interventions, 2010–2030. These points show average cumulative DALYs per 1000 population, and the error bars reflect a simulation of the probability that 10,000 people are above and below the average by one standard deviation
Effect of restriction strategies, 2010–2030
| Reduction in cumulative burden (%) | |
|---|---|
| Salt‐restriction spoon addition | |
| 1/4 salt‐restriction spoon (197 mg) | 20.42 (=3.71/18.17) |
| 1/2 salt‐restriction spoon (394 mg) | 19.54 (=3.55/18.17) |
| 3/4 salt‐restriction spoon (591 mg) | 17.34 (=3.15/18.17) |
| 1 salt‐restriction spoon (788 mg) | 16.73 (=3.04/18.17) |
| Percentage of consuming highest sodium foods | |
| 95% substitution | 66.43 (=12.07/18.17) |
| 85% substitution | 65.44 (=11.89/18.17) |
| 75% substitution | 65.00 (=11.81/18.17) |
| 65% substitution | 64.61 (=11.74/18.17) |
Note: Values are percent (the actual numerator and denominator). Results are shown that the percent reductions in cumulative disability‐adjusted life year burdens (DALYs) due to the decline in salt consumption caused by intervention from 2010 to 2030.
Select intervention results by provinces
| Province | Salt addition (%) | Salt substitutes (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Beijing | 14.03 (=2.55/18.17) | 67.12 (=12.20/18.17) |
| Liaoning | 18.22 (=3.31/18.17) | 66.83 (=12.14/18.17) |
| Heilongjiang | 18.27 (=3.32/18.17) | 67.95 (=12.35/18.17) |
| Shanghai | 12.16 (=2.21/18.17) | 66.71 (=12.12/18.17) |
| Jiangsu | 16.40 (=2.98/18.17) | 66.54 (=12.09/18.17) |
| Shandong | 18.99 (=3.45/18.17) | 67.02 (=12.18/18.17) |
| Henan | 19.04 (=3.46/18.17) | 68.25 (=12.40/18.17) |
| Hubei | 18.01 (=3.27/18.17) | 67.19 (=12.22/18.17) |
| Hunan | 15.96 (=2.90/18.17) | 66.89 (=12.15/18.17) |
| Guangxi | 15.82 (=2.87/18.17) | 67.69 (=12.30/18.17) |
| Guizhou | 17.01 (=3.09/18.17) | 67.07 (=12.19/18.17) |
| Chongqing | 16.57 (=3.01/18.17) | 67.15 (=12.21/18.17) |
Note: Values are percent (the actual numerator and denominator). The mean percent reductions in cumulative disability‐adjusted life year burdens (DALYs) due to the decline in salt consumption caused by intervention from 2010 to 2030 are shown.
Figure 3The percentage change in the cumulative burden of salt restriction spoons (left) and salt substitution (right) is calculated based on demographic characteristics, respectively: (A) sex, (B) age, (C) region. (D) shows the estimated daily sodium intake by an iterative simulation before and after the intervention