Literature DB >> 35284512

Comparison of alternative arterial anastomosis site during liver transplantation when the recipient's hepatic artery is unusable.

Jean Marie Beaurepaire1,2, Francesco Orlando1, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri1, Caroline Jezequel3, Edouard Bardou-Jacquet2,3,4, Christophe Camus4,5, Mohamed Lakehal1, Veronique Desfourneaux1, Aude Merdrignac1,2, Elodie Gaignard1,2, Alexandre Thobie1, Damien Bergeat1,2, Bernard Meunier1,2, Michel Rayar1,2,4.   

Abstract

Background: Few studies have analyzed outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) when the recipient hepatic artery (HA) was not usable.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of LT performed using the different alternative sites to HA.
Results: Between 2002 and 2017, 1,677 LT were performed in our institution among which 141 (8.4%) with unusable recipient HA were analyzed. Four groups were defined according to the site of anastomosis: the splenic artery (SA group, n=26), coeliac trunk (CT group, n=12), aorta using or not the donor's vessel (Ao group, n=91) and aorta using a vascular prosthesis (Ao-P group, n=12) as conduit. The median number of intraoperative red blood cell transfusions was significantly increased in the Ao and Ao-P groups (5, 5, 8.5 and 16 for SA, CT, Ao and Ao-P group respectively, P=0.002), as well as fresh frozen plasma (4.5, 2.5, 10, 17 for the SA, CT, Ao and Ao-P groups respectively, P=0.001). Hospitalization duration was also significantly increased in the Ao and Ao-P groups (15, 16, 24, 26.5 days for the SA, CT, Ao and Ao-P groups respectively, P<0.001). The occurrence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) (P=0.07) or arterial complications (P=0.26) was not statistically different. Level of factor V, INR, bilirubin and creatinine during the 7th postoperative days (POD) was significantly improved in the SA group. No difference was observed regarding graft (P=0.18) and patient (P=0.16) survival. Conclusions: In case of unusable HA, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes are improved when using the SA or CT compared to aorta. 2022 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver transplantation (LT); arterial anastomosis; hepatic artery (HA); splenic artery (SA)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35284512      PMCID: PMC8847870          DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-20-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN: 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


  28 in total

1.  Use of the subcutaneous route and polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for arterial revascularization in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Leandro C Mosna; Jang Moon; Francisco Hernandez; Peter Hodgkinson; Ji Fan; Gennaro Selvaggi; Akin Tekin; Seigo Nishida; David Levi; Andreas G Tzakis
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  A New Consideration in Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Adult Liver Transplant: Arterial Transposition Versus Extra-Anatomic Jump Grafts.

Authors:  Kourosh Kazemi; Pirooz Samidoost; Hamed Nikoupour Deilami; Seyed Ali Malek Hosseini; Saman Nikeghbalian; Alireza Shamsaeefar; Masood Dehghani; Mohsenreza Mansoorian; Siavash Gholami; Bahareh Khosravi
Journal:  Exp Clin Transplant       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.945

3.  Use of the recipient celiac trunk for hepatic artery reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  A El-Hinnawi; S Nishida; D Levi; G Selvaggi; A Tekin; J Fan; P Ernesto; F Kyota; A G Tzakis
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Results of using the recipient's splenic artery for arterial reconstruction in liver transplantation in 23 patients.

Authors:  J Figueras; D Parés; H Aranda; A Rafecas; J Fabregat; J Torras; E Ramos; C Lama; L Lladó; E Jaurrieta
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Hepatic artery occlusion in liver transplantation: What counts more, the type of reconstruction or the severity of the recipient's disease?

Authors:  Christian E Oberkofler; Tim Reese; Dimitri A Raptis; Christoph Kuemmerli; Olivier de Rougemont; Michelle L De Oliveira; Andrea Schlegel; Philipp Dutkowski; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Henrik Petrowsky
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.799

6.  Risk factors associated with early and late HAT after adult liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Ji-Chun Zhao; Lu-Nan Yan; Yu-Kui Ma; Bin Huang; Ding Yuan; Bo Li; Tian-Fu Wen; Wen-Tao Wang; Ming-Qing Xu; Jia-Yin Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Early hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence, outcome and risk factors.

Authors:  J Bekker; S Ploem; K P de Jong
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Clinical presentation of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation in the cyclosporine era.

Authors:  A G Tzakis; R D Gordon; B W Shaw; S Iwatsuki; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Long-term deleterious effects of aortohepatic conduits in primary liver transplantation: proceed with caution.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Seigo Nishida; David M Levi; Daisuke Sugiyama; Kyota Fukazawa; Akin Tekin; Ji Fan; Gennaro Selvaggi; Phillip Ruiz; Andreas G Tzakis
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  A new technique for arterialization of the hepatic graft.

Authors:  M Kalayoglu; F O Belzer
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.