Literature DB >> 23897778

Long-term deleterious effects of aortohepatic conduits in primary liver transplantation: proceed with caution.

Taizo Hibi1, Seigo Nishida, David M Levi, Daisuke Sugiyama, Kyota Fukazawa, Akin Tekin, Ji Fan, Gennaro Selvaggi, Phillip Ruiz, Andreas G Tzakis.   

Abstract

Aortohepatic conduits provide a vital alternative for graft arterialization during liver transplantation. Conflicting results exist with respect to the rates of comorbidities, and long-term survival data on primary grafts are lacking. To identify the complications associated with aortohepatic conduits in primary liver transplantation and their impact on survival, we conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort analysis of all consecutive adult (n = 1379) and pediatric primary liver transplants (n = 188) from 1998 to 2009. The outcomes of aortohepatic conduits were compared to those of standard arterial revascularization. Adults with a conduit (n = 267) demonstrated, in comparison with adults with standard arterialization (n = 1112), an increased incidence of late (>1 month after transplantation) hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT; 4.1% versus 0.7%, P < 0.001) and ischemic cholangiopathy (7.5% versus 2.7%, P < 0.001) and a lower 5-year graft survival rate (61% versus 70%, P = 0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for graft loss in the conduit group was 1.38 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.85, P = 0.03]. Notably, the use of conduits (HR = 4.91, 95% CI = 1.92-12.58) and a warm ischemia time > 60 minutes (HR = 11.12, 95% CI = 3.06-40.45) were independent risk factors for late HAT. Among children, the complication profiles were similar for the conduit group (n = 81) and the standard group (n = 107). In the pediatric cohort, although the 5-year graft survival rate for the conduit group (69%) was significantly impaired in comparison with the rate for the standard group (81%, P = 0.03), the use of aortohepatic conduits did not emerge as an independent predictor of diminished graft survival via a multivariate analysis. In conclusion, in adult primary liver transplantation, the placement of an aortohepatic conduit should be strictly limited because of the greater complication rates (notably late HAT) and impaired graft survival; for children, its judicious use may be acceptable.
© 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23897778     DOI: 10.1002/lt.23689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of alternative arterial anastomosis site during liver transplantation when the recipient's hepatic artery is unusable.

Authors:  Jean Marie Beaurepaire; Francesco Orlando; Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Caroline Jezequel; Edouard Bardou-Jacquet; Christophe Camus; Mohamed Lakehal; Veronique Desfourneaux; Aude Merdrignac; Elodie Gaignard; Alexandre Thobie; Damien Bergeat; Bernard Meunier; Michel Rayar
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  Liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignancies: a new era of "Transplant Oncology" has begun.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Osamu Itano; Masahiro Shinoda; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Current status of the organ replacement approach for malignancies and an overture for organ bioengineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Masahiro Shinoda; Osamu Itano; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Liver Transplantation Utilizing Mixed Biologic and Synthetic Arterial Conduits.

Authors:  Marcio F Chedid; Tomaz J M Grezzana-Filho; Aljamir D Chedid; Luiz Pedro P Hendges; Ian Leipnitz; Mario R Alvares-da-Silva; Ariane N Backes; Matheus J Reis; Cleber Dario P Kruel; Cleber R P Kruel
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2016-10-12

Review 5.  Liver transplantation in the treatment of severe iatrogenic liver injuries.

Authors:  Andrea Lauterio; Riccardo De Carlis; Stefano Di Sandro; Fabio Ferla; Vincenzo Buscemi; Luciano De Carlis
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-08-28

6.  Comparison of Supraceliac and Infrarenal Aortic Conduits in Liver Transplantation: Is There a Difference in Patency and Postoperative Renal Dysfunction?

Authors:  David Livingston; David D Lee; Sarah Croome; C Burcin Taner; Kristopher P Croome
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2019-10-08

7.  Placement of an Aortohepatic Conduit as an Alternative to Standard Arterial Anastomosis in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Dong-Hwan Jung; Cheon-Soo Park; Tae-Yong Ha; Gi-Won Song; Gil-Chun Park; Yong-Pil Cho; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 1.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.