Literature DB >> 35284341

Presence of enteric bacterial pathogens in meat samples of wild boar hunted in Campania region, southern Italy.

Maria Francesca Peruzy1, Daniela Cristiano2, Elisabetta Delibato3, Nicola D'Alessio4, Yolande T R Proroga2, Rosaria Luana Capozza2, Antonio Rippa1, Nicoletta Murru1,5.   

Abstract

Wild boars can be infected with several foodborne pathogens which may be transmitted to humans through the consumption of their meat, but currently, data of their prevalence are still limited. The present study aimed to evaluate the presence of enteric pathogens in wild boar meat samples killed in the Campania region. Twentyeight wild boar meat samples were analyzed for the detection of Salmonella spp, Y. enterocolitica, Campylobacter spp., and Shiga- Toxigenic E. coli. Salmonella spp. was detected and isolated in ten samples and after serotyping S. Veneziana, S. Kasenyi, S. Coeln, S. Manhattan, S. Thompson, and S. Stanleyville were identified. Twenty-one meat samples were found to be contaminated with Y. enterocolitica; in 6 samples the ystA and ystB genes were detected simultaneously, while in 15 only the ystB gene, which characterizes the bacteria belonging to the biotype 1A, was present. Shiga-Toxin producing E. coli was detected in 12 while Campylobacter spp was never detected. In conclusion, due to the high occurrence of pathogenic bacteria detected, the present research shows that wild boars are important reservoirs for foodborne zoonoses which may be transmitted to livestock and humans. This confirms the importance of controls throughout the wild boar supply chain. In the Campania region, checks are guaranteed by the Veterinarians who work within the "management and control plan for wild boar in the Campania region" which has the twofold objective of containing the increasingly invasive presence of this animal and guaranteeing greater safety, traceability, and transparency in the consumption of meat. ©Copyright: the Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacter spp; Salmonella spp; Shiga- Toxigenic E. coli; Wild boar meat; Y. enterocolitica

Year:  2022        PMID: 35284341      PMCID: PMC8883827          DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2022.9967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ital J Food Saf        ISSN: 2239-7132


Introduction

Wild boars (Sus scrofa) are the most widely distributed large mammals in the world (Massei et al., 2015) and they are present in all continents, except for Antarctica (Sales et al., 2017). Wild boars are characterized by the highest reproductive rate among the ungulates and therefore in the latest years, the population is dramatically increased (Fredriksson-Ahomaa, 2019). Moreover, in recent years, they are introducing into a wide variety of habitats including urban and peri-urban areas (Bertelloni et al., 2020). Economic interest for these animals is related to the damage of crops and husbandry and the possibility of transmitting the disease to livestock and humans (Massei et al., 2015). The likely exchange of disease between wild boars, domestic animals, and humans raised increased interest also among researchers (Bonardi et al., 2019). In contrast to domesticated animals, wild boars roam free and their diet is uncontrolled, feeding of whatever is available, including live and dead animals (Fredriksson-Ahomaa, 2019). Therefore, the natural microbial population on the skin and in the digestive tract can significantly differ between the animals. Moreover, wild boars can be infected with several foodborne pathogens which may be transmitted to humans through the consumption of their meat. In the past, the wild boar meat was eaten only by hunters and their families but nowadays it is considered a healthy and delicious food and therefore it has drawn the attention of a wider range of consumers. Unfortunately, data on the consumption of wild boar meat at a European level are still limited. The meat of wild boars is mainly consumed cooked but though some wild boar meat products are not heat-treated but only dry-cured, cold smoked, and dried (Mirceta et al., 2017). In the latest years, the four most reported zoonotic agents during gastrointestinal infection in humans were Campylobacter (C.), Salmonella (S.), Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), and Yersinia (Y.) (EFSA, 2021). In 2019, 220,682 and 87,923 confirmed cases of campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis in humans were reported, respectively (EFSA, 2021). The main environmental niche for Campylobacter is represented by the intestinal tract of all avian species but Campylobacter species colonize also different apparatuses of domestic (cattle and pigs) or wild animals (birds such as ducks and gulls) and can be transmitted to humans through the consumption of this raw or undercooked meat (Facciolà et al., 2017). Concerning salmonellosis, in 2019, pig meat and products thereof were one of the most implicated food vehicles in strong-evidence food-borne outbreaks (EFSA, 2021). Escherichia coli is a commensal bacterium living in the intestines of animals and humans but some pathotypes can be responsible for gastrointestinal infections: i) enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), ii) STEC, or verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC), iii) enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), iv) enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), v) enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC or EAggEC), vi) enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), vii) diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC), and viii) adherent invasive E. coli (AIEC) (Bertelloni et al., 2020). Compared to other foodborne bacteria very little data on the incidence of Y. enterocolitica in foods and animals are available from EU states probably because according to the Zoonoses Directive 2003/99/EC, reports of Yersinia occurrence or prevalence are not mandatory and even because current methods for the pathogen’s isolation and detection proved to be undermined by several limitations (Cristiano et al, 2021; Peruzy et al., 2020). Strains of Y. enterocolitica can be classified into six biotypes 1A, 1B, 2, 3, 4, 5 and at least 57 different serotypes. The biotype 1A has been considered as not pathogenic, though in the latest years has been associated with yersiniosis cases in humans (Strydom et al., 2019). These enteric pathogens have been detected also in wild boar meat samples, but data are still limited. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to evaluate the prevalence of the most reported zoonotic agents, i.e. Campylobacter, Salmonella, Yersinia enterocolitica, and STEC in wild boar populations living in the Campania region.

Materials and methods

Sampling

From October 2019 to January 2020, meat samples of 28 wild boars (W1 to W28), 14 males (average weight: 53.57 Kg), and 14 females (average weight: 47.07 Kg), aged between 4 months and 7 years, were collected in Campania region, southern Italy (Table 1). The wild boars were hunted by official hunters by the ‘‘driving’’ technique. The animals were immediately bled in the field and brought to hunters’ private houses where the evisceration and skinning were performed. Subsequently, approx. 100 cm2 meat was aseptically cut out the forearm area (at least 100 g each) and individually placed in sterile stomacher blender bags. All samples were transported at 4°C to the laboratory and processed within one hour after sampling.
Table 1.

Gender, age (years (Y)/months (M)) and weight (kg) of the shot animals, presence of foodborne bacteria genes detected using Real-Time PCR.

Animal IDSexAgeWeight (Kg)STECY. enterocoliticaSalmonella spp.
Genes'detection from the brothGenes’ detection from isolated colonies
stx1/stx2eaEstx1/stx2eaEystAystBiQ-Check Real-Time PCR KitsSalmonella (S.) serotypes
W1F4Y75D.D.D.S.Thompson
W2F1Y20D.D.D.D.S.Coeln
W3M1Y25D.D.
W4F2Y40D.D.D.
W5F1Y30D.D.D.S.Manhattan
W6F3Y75D.D.D.D.D.D.S.Veneziana
W7F1Y30D.D.D.D.D.
W8F1Y35D.D.D.
W9M1Y40D.
W10M1Y30D.D.D.D.D.S.Thompson
W11F1Y30D.D.D.D.D.D.S.Kasenyi
W12F2Y64D.D.D.D.D.S.Kasenyi
W13M6Y100D.D.
W14M7Y75D.D.D.D.
W15F3Y50D.
W16F3Y50
W17M3Y70D.
W18M3Y70D.D.D.
W19F2Y70D.D.S.Kasenyi
W20F4Y70D.D.D.
W21M2Y75D.D.D.D.D.S.Stanleyville
W22M3Y80D.D.D.D.D.D.
W23M2Y50D.D.
W24M1Y30D.D.D.S.Kasenyi
W25M1Y30D.D.D.
W26M7M40D.D.D.D.
W27F4M20D.D.
W28M3Y70D.D.

D: Detected.

Detection of pathogenic bacteria

For the detection of relevant foodborne pathogens, 25 grams portions of each meat sample were homogenized separately i) in 225 ml (1:10 (W/W)) buffer peptone water (BPW, CM0509, Oxoid) and incubated at 37°C for 24-h for the detection of Salmonella (S.) and STEC, ii) in 225 ml Campylobacter Bolton Enrichment Broth Base (Bolton Broth, 401286B2, Biolife), supplemented with Bolton Broth Selective Supplement (4240025, Biolife) and Lysed horse blood (90HLX100, Biolife) and incubated at 41.5°C in the microaerophilic atmosphere for 24-h for the detection of Campylobacter (C.), and iii) in 225 ml Peptone Sorbitol Bile Broth (PSB, 17192, Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated at 25°C for 24-h for the detection of Yersinia (Y.) enterocolitica. From each enrichment broth, the “iQ-Check Real-Time PCR Kits” were used for the detection of Salmonella (BR3578123, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), STEC (BR3578139, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and Campylobacter (BR3578135, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), following manufacturer’s recommendations. Concerning STEC, the “iQCheck Real-Time PCR Kits”, allowed the individual identification of the virulence genes stx and stx (Shiga toxin 1/2) and eae (intimin). For the detection of Y. enterocolitica, DNA was extracted from each enrichment broth using the Chelex- 100-resin method (1422822, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) whereby two ml of each incubated homogenate was transferred into a two ml centrifuge tube and centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000×g at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded, the pellet re-suspended in 300 μl of 6% Chelex 100 by vortexing, and incubated for 20 min at 56°C and again for 8 min at 100°C. The suspension was immediately chilled on ice for 1 min and centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 ×g at 4°C. To evaluate the presence of Y. enterocolitica 4/O:3 and biotype 1A, a SYBR green PCR-assay was conducted, with the gene ystA as target for the pathogenic biotype (Peruzy et al., 2017). Therefore, 3 μl of DNA extract was added to 22 μl of PCR mix. The mastermix contained 12.5 μl of Qiagen QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (1x), 100 nM of both primers ystA-F (5′- ATCGACACCAATAACCGCTGAG-3′) and ystA-R (5′-CCAATCACTACTGACTTCGGCT- 3′). To evaluate the presence of the biotype 1A, the presence of the target gene ystB gene was examined (Peruzy et al., 2017). Three μl of DNA extract was added to 22 μl of PCR mastermix containing 12.5 μl of Qiagen QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (1x), 150 nM of both primers ystB-F (5′-GTACATTAGGCCAAGAGACG- 3′) and ystBR (5′-GCAACATACCTCACAACACC-3′). The fluorescence of SYBR Green and the melting curve was generated using the CFX96 system (Bio-Rad). A specific melting temperature (Tm) of 78.5±1°C indicated a positive result. While awaiting the Real- Time PCR (RT-PCR) results, the enrichment broths were stored at 4 °C. Real-Time PCR positive results for Salmonella spp., STEC, Campylobacter, or Y. enterocolitica were confirmed using the corresponding normalized microbiological isolation methods ISO 6579-1:2017, 13136-1:2012, 10272-1:2017 and 10273:2017. Concerning STEC, colony confirmation was performed by mean the “iQ-Check Real-Time PCR Kits”. Gender, age (years (Y)/months (M)) and weight (kg) of the shot animals, presence of foodborne bacteria genes detected using Real-Time PCR. D: Detected.

Statistical analysis

To compare the bacterial counts, a oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) was calculated using PAST software package (https://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/).

Results and discussion

Wild boars are an important reservoir of zoonoses whose frequency may vary across populations living in different countries and even in different regions within the same country (Gill, 2007). Some of these can cause foodborne illness in humans, who may be infected by consuming contaminated wild boar meat. Among them, a good deal has an enteric origin, and the presence of them on the carcass surface is mainly the result of an improper evisceration (Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 2018). In the present study, a total of 28 samples were analyzed for enteric pathogens’ detection and except for Campylobacter all the other genes investigated were detected. The overall percentage of wild boars positive per at least one of the enteric pathogen genes tested was 96.43% (Table 1). No significant correlation was observed between genes detection and the gender, age, and weight of the animals. Salmonella spp. was detected and isolated in 10 out of 28 enrichment broths analyzed (35.71%) and after serotyping six serovars were identified (S. Coeln, S. Kasenyi, S. Manhattan, S. Stanleyville, S. Thompson, and S. Veneziana). The occurrence of Salmonella is comparable to that we observed previously in wild boars hunted in the Campania region in 2017 (31.82%, Peruzy et al., 2019) but it was higher than those observed by Atanassova et al., (2008) in Germany, Peter Paulsen & Winkelmayer, (2004) in Austria, Mirceta et al., (2017) in Serbia, and Wacheck et al., (2010) in Switzerland. Considering the serovars, S. Kasenyi was the most frequently isolated (W11, W12, W19, and W24). S. Kanseny is frequently isolated in the wild boar population living in the Campania region (La Tela et al., 2021; Peruzy et al., 2019) but, to our knowledge, it has not been reported in any other wild boar living in other regions or other countries. Differently, S. Thompson detected in the present study in two animals (W1 and W10) is widespread in wild boar population and several other animal species and it has been associated with a severe human outbreak in the Netherlands in 2012 (Stella et al., 2018). S. Veneziana, S. Stanleyville, S. Manhattan, and S. Coeln detected in the present work have been previously isolated in wild boars (Bonardi et al., 2019; Razzuoli et al., 2021) and S. Coeln belong to the 20 most frequent serovars isolated in human cases in Europe (EFSA, 2021). In the present study, Y. enterocolitica and STEC were detected in a high number of enrichment broths. Concerning Y. enterocolitica, six enrichment broths (21.43 %) carried both ystA and ystB genes, whilst in fifteen (53.57 %) only the gene ystB, used as a target for Biotype 1A (Peruzy et al., 2017), was detected. However, the pathogen was only isolated from one sample (W18). Pigs are considered the major reservoir where the bacterium has been commonly isolated from the tonsils and gastrointestinal tract and the contamination of the meat result from improper slaughter and evisceration techniques (Fredrikssonahomaa et al., 2006). Results of the present work confirm that wild boars could be considered an underestimated reservoir of Y. enterocolitica, as well (Morka et al., 2018). Concerning STEC, except for the animal W16 the gene eae was detected in all enrichment broths analysed. Genes stx1 and stx2 were always detected together. Twelve enrichment broths (42.86%) were positive for both stx1/stx2 and eae genes, whilst in fifteen enrichment broths (53.57%) only the gene eae was detected. Only in four and nine strains the genes stx1/stx2 and eae, respectively, were also detected from the colony’s growth on the agar plates. The gene eae responsible for the typical attaching and effacing lesions was used as a target for the detection of Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), which are defined as intimin (eae)-containing diarrheagenic E. coli that do not possess the stx genes (Alonso et al., 2017). Wild boars acting as a carrier of EPEC have been previously demonstrated by Szczerba- Turek et al., (2019) who detected them in 30.9% of the animals and other Spanish and Italian studies but a lower occurrence was reported (Spain = 3.3%, Alonso et al., 2017; Italy = 3.4%, Bertelloni et al., 2020). Moreover, based on results, wild boars act also as carriers of Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC). In particular, the co-carriage of both stx and eae genes indicates the presence of EHEC which constitutes a subset of serotypes of STEC, (Kobayashi et al., 2003). EHEC responsible for both Shigatoxins production and attaching and effacing lesions is associated with severe forms of human disease (Soare et al., 2021). To our knowledge, limited data are available on the occurrence of EHEC in wild boars, however, the results of the present work contrast with those of Bertelloni et al. (2020) which reported a lower occurrence of EHEC (6.3%). In the present work Campylobacter, the most reported gastrointestinal bacterial pathogen in humans in the European Union (EU) (EFSA, 2021), was never detected. A low occurrence was demonstrated also by Fredriksson-Ahomaa et al., (2020, 5%), and Atanassova et al., (2008, 2.1%), whilst a higher occurrence was observed by Stella et al., (2018, 16.7%).

Conclusions

In conclusion, due to the high occurrence of pathogenic bacteria detected, the present research shows that wild boars are important reservoirs for foodborne zoonoses. Therefore, based on results consumption of undercooked wild boar meat could pose a public health risk. Moreover, the spread of pathogenic bacteria in the natural environment constitutes a potential hazard also for domestic animals. In the Campania region, checks are guaranteed by the Veterinarians who work within the “management and control plan for wild boar in the Campania region” which has the twofold objective of containing the increasingly invasive presence of this animal and guaranteeing greater safety, traceability and transparency in the consumption of meat.
  25 in total

1.  Microbiological quality of freshly shot game in Germany.

Authors:  V Atanassova; J Apelt; F Reich; G Klein
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Evaluation of virulence genes in Yersinia enterocolitica strains using SYBR Green real-time PCR.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Peruzy; Nicoletta Murru; Anna Giannina Perugini; Federico Capuano; Elisabetta Delibato; Raffaelina Mercogliano; Hannu Korkeala; Yolande Therese Rose Proroga
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 5.516

3.  Limited Exchange of Salmonella Among Domestic Pigs and Wild Boars in Italy.

Authors:  Silvia Bonardi; Luca Bolzoni; Renato Giulio Zanoni; Marina Morganti; Margherita Corradi; Stefano Gilioli; Stefano Pongolini
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  Microbiological conditions of meats from large game animals and birds.

Authors:  C O Gill
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  The European Union One Health 2019 Zoonoses Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-02-27

6.  Niche conservatism and the invasive potential of the wild boar.

Authors:  Lilian Patrícia Sales; Bruno R Ribeiro; Matt Warrington Hayward; Adriano Paglia; Marcelo Passamani; Rafael Loyola
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Microbiological Evaluation of Carcasses of Wild Boar Hunted in a Hill Area of Northern Italy.

Authors:  Simone Stella; Erica Tirloni; Emanuele Castelli; Fabio Colombo; Cristian Bernardi
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.077

8.  Pathogenic potential to humans of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from wild boars in Poland.

Authors:  A Szczerba-Turek; P Socha; A Bancerz-Kisiel; A Platt-Samoraj; K Lipczynska-Ilczuk; J Siemionek; K Kończyk; E Terech-Majewska; Wojciech Szweda
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Identification of Yersinia enterocolitica isolates from humans, pigs and wild boars by MALDI TOF MS.

Authors:  Katarzyna Morka; Jarosław Bystroń; Jacek Bania; Agnieszka Korzeniowska-Kowal; Kamila Korzekwa; Katarzyna Guz-Regner; Gabriela Bugla-Płoskońska
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Foodborne Zoonoses Common in Hunted Wild Boars.

Authors:  Maria Fredriksson-Ahomaa; Laura London; Teresa Skrzypczak; Tuija Kantala; Ilona Laamanen; Mia Biström; Leena Maunula; Tuija Gadd
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.184

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.