Literature DB >> 35284262

Real-world study for identifying the predictive factors of surgical intervention and the value of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with low back pain.

Hui Wang1, Chang Liu2, Zhou Meng3, Wenxian Zhou1, Tao Chen1, Kai Zhang4, Aimin Wu1.   

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent disease and can be disabling. Currently, many patients with LBP with or without radiculopathy commonly undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis and therapeutic assessment, yet the final intervention is mainly centered around nonoperative treatment. This study's aim was to identify the predictive factors of surgical treatment and the value of MRI in patients with LBP with or without radiculopathy.
Methods: The study included a training cohort that consisted of 461 patients with MRI from January 2014 to December 2018. Demographic characteristics and MRI findings were collected from our medical records. We developed and validated 2 nomograms to predict the possibility of receiving surgical treatment in LBP patients, based on multivariable logistic regression analysis. The performance of the 2 nomograms was assessed in terms of their calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. An independent validation cohort containing 163 patients was comparatively analyzed.
Results: The baseline model incorporated 6 clinicopathological variables, while the MRI model consisted of 9 variables including several MRI findings. Internal validation revealed the good performance of the 2 nomograms in discrimination and calibration, with a concordance index (C-index) of 0.799 (95% CI: 0.743-0.855) for the baseline model and 0.834 (95% CI: 0.783-0.884) for the MRI model, which showed that the addition of MRI findings to the nomogram failed to achieve better prognostic value (Z statistic =-1.509; P=0.131). Application of the 2 models in the validation cohort also showed good discrimination (baseline model: C-index 0.75, 95% CI: 0.671-0.829; MRI model: C-index 0.777, 95% CI: 0.696-0.857) and calibration. No significant predictive benefit was found in the MRI model in the validation cohort (Z statistic =-0.588; P=0.557). Conclusions: This study showed that clinical demographic characteristics provide good prognostic value to determine whether LBP patients with or without radiculopathy require surgical treatment. The addition of MRI findings yielded no significantly incremental prognostic value. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain (LBP); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); nomogram; prediction

Year:  2022        PMID: 35284262      PMCID: PMC8899926          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  29 in total

Review 1.  Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  David F Fardon; Alan L Williams; Edward J Dohring; F Reed Murtagh; Stephen L Gabriel Rothman; Gordon K Sze
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based synthetic computed tomography of the lumbar spine for surgical planning: a clinical proof-of-concept.

Authors:  Victor E Staartjes; Peter R Seevinck; W Peter Vandertop; Marijn van Stralen; Marc L Schröder
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  A nomogram to predict prognosis after surgery in early stage non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Fenghao Sun; Ke Ma; Xiaodong Yang; Ming Li; Yu Shi; Cheng Zhan; Wei Jiang; Qun Wang
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 6.071

4.  Low back pain and sciatica: summary of NICE guidance.

Authors:  Ian A Bernstein; Qudsia Malik; Serena Carville; Stephen Ward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-01-06

5.  What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement?

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Judith A Turner; Joan M Romano
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Influence of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Surgical Decision Making for Patients with Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Survey Among Experienced Spine Surgeons.

Authors:  Lukas Grassner; Christof Wutte; Georg Zimmermann; Andreas Grillhösl; Katharina Schmid; Thomas Weiβ; Walter Maier; Stefan Hauck; Tobias Hollerith; Matthias Vogel; Michael Bierschneider; Jan Vastmans; Claudius Thomé; Oliver Gonschorek; Martin Strowitzki
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain.

Authors:  M C Jensen; M N Brant-Zawadzki; N Obuchowski; M T Modic; D Malkasian; J S Ross
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yan-Qi Huang; Chang-Hong Liang; Lan He; Jie Tian; Cui-Shan Liang; Xin Chen; Ze-Lan Ma; Zai-Yi Liu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The associations between magnetic resonance imaging findings and low back pain: A 10-year longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Juichi Tonosu; Hiroyuki Oka; Akiro Higashikawa; Hiroshi Okazaki; Sakae Tanaka; Ko Matsudaira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Preoperative MRI findings predict two-year postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Pekka Kuittinen; Petri Sipola; Ville Leinonen; Tapani Saari; Sanna Sinikallio; Sakari Savolainen; Heikki Kröger; Veli Turunen; Olavi Airaksinen; Timo Aalto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.