Literature DB >> 10873373

Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations.

.   

Abstract

Although dissatisfaction with the limitations associated with tests for statistical significance has been growing for several decades, applied researchers have continued to rely almost exclusively on these indicators of effect when reporting their findings. To encourage an increased use of alternative measures of effect, the present paper discusses several measures of effect size that might be used in group comparison studies involving univariate and/or multivariate models. For the methods discussed, formulas are presented and data from an experimental study are used to demonstrate the application and interpretation of these indices. The paper concludes with some cautionary notes on the limitations associated with these measures of effect size. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Year:  2000        PMID: 10873373     DOI: 10.1006/ceps.2000.1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Educ Psychol        ISSN: 0361-476X


  81 in total

1.  The effect of stability and change in health behaviors on trajectories of body mass index in older Americans: a 14-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Anda Botoseneanu; Jersey Liang
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Regional gray matter volume mediates the relationship between family socioeconomic status and depression-related trait in a young healthy sample.

Authors:  Junyi Yang; Huijuan Liu; Dongtao Wei; Wei Liu; Jie Meng; Kangcheng Wang; Lei Hao; Jiang Qiu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: expressing and interpreting associations and effect sizes in clinical outcome assessments.

Authors:  Lori D McLeod; Joseph C Cappelleri; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Influence of aripiprazole pretreatment on the reinforcing effects of methamphetamine in humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; J Adam Bennett; Joshua A Lile; Rajkumar J Sevak; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.067

5.  Standardized Effect Sizes for Preventive Mobile Health Interventions in Micro-randomized Trials.

Authors:  Brook Luers; Predrag Klasnja; Susan Murphy
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-01

6.  Responsiveness of the QuickDASH and SF-12 in workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Z Joyce Fan; Caroline K Smith; Barbara A Silverstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-06

7.  Variability of swallowing performance in intact, freely feeding aplysia.

Authors:  Cecilia S Lum; Yuriy Zhurov; Elizabeth C Cropper; Klaudiusz R Weiss; Vladimir Brezina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Benefits of Accumulating Versus Diminishing Cues in Recall.

Authors:  Jason R Finley; Aaron S Benjamin; Matthew J Hays; Robert A Bjork; Nate Kornell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  3D stereophotogrammetry versus traditional craniofacial anthropometry: Comparing measurements from the 3D facial norms database to Farkas's North American norms.

Authors:  Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Jason R Finley; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.