Literature DB >> 25411485

The neural circuit mechanisms underlying the retinal response to motion reversal.

Eric Y Chen1, Janice Chou2, Jeongsook Park3, Greg Schwartz4, Michael J Berry5.   

Abstract

To make up for delays in visual processing, retinal circuitry effectively predicts that a moving object will continue moving in a straight line, allowing retinal ganglion cells to anticipate the object's position. However, a sudden reversal of motion triggers a synchronous burst of firing from a large group of ganglion cells, possibly signaling a violation of the retina's motion prediction. To investigate the neural circuitry underlying this response, we used a combination of multielectrode array and whole-cell patch recordings to measure the responses of individual retinal ganglion cells in the tiger salamander to reversing stimuli. We found that different populations of ganglion cells were responsible for responding to the reversal of different kinds of objects, such as bright versus dark objects. Using pharmacology and designed stimuli, we concluded that ON and OFF bipolar cells both contributed to the reversal response, but that amacrine cells had, at best, a minor role. This allowed us to formulate an adaptive cascade model (ACM), similar to the one previously used to describe ganglion cell responses to motion onset. By incorporating the ON pathway into the ACM, we were able to reproduce the time-varying firing rate of fast OFF ganglion cells for all experimentally tested stimuli. Analysis of the ACM demonstrates that bipolar cell gain control is primarily responsible for generating the synchronized retinal response, as individual bipolar cells require a constant time delay before recovering from gain control.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3415557-19$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive cascade model; gain control; ganglion cell; motion discontinuity; motion reversal; retina

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411485      PMCID: PMC4236393          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1460-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Motion onset captures attention.

Authors:  Richard A Abrams; Shawn E Christ
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

2.  Spectral sensitivity of human cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  J L Schnapf; T W Kraft; D A Baylor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jan 29-Feb 4       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effects of picrotoxin and strychnine upon electrical activity of the proximal retina.

Authors:  D A Burkhardt
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1972-08-11       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Comparison of visual evoked potentials to stationary and to moving patterns.

Authors:  P G Clarke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1973-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Electroencephalogram potentials evoked by accelerated visual motion.

Authors:  D M MacKay; W J Rietveld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Neuronal correlates of edge preference in prey-catching behavior of toads Bufo bufo.

Authors:  H Tsai; H Burghagen; E Schürg-Pfeiffer; J P Ewert
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1983-06

7.  Spatial contrast sensitivity of cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  P Lennie; V H Perry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid: a new pharmacological tool for retina research.

Authors:  M M Slaughter; R F Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Characterization of receptors for glutamate and GABA in retinal neurons.

Authors:  Xiong-Li Yang
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Organization of retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. I. Synaptic structure.

Authors:  J E Dowling; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Contrast coding in the electrosensory system: parallels with visual computation.

Authors:  Stephen E Clarke; André Longtin; Leonard Maler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Unusual Physiological Properties of Smooth Monostratified Ganglion Cell Types in Primate Retina.

Authors:  Colleen E Rhoades; Nishal P Shah; Michael B Manookin; Nora Brackbill; Alexandra Kling; Georges Goetz; Alexander Sher; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The oscillation-like activity in bullfrog ON-OFF retinal ganglion cell.

Authors:  Xiao-Wei Qiu; Hai-Qing Gong; Pu-Ming Zhang; Pei-Ji Liang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 4.  The dynamic receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Sophia Wienbar; Gregory W Schwartz
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Three Small-Receptive-Field Ganglion Cells in the Mouse Retina Are Distinctly Tuned to Size, Speed, and Object Motion.

Authors:  Jason Jacoby; Gregory W Schwartz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  From deep learning to mechanistic understanding in neuroscience: the structure of retinal prediction.

Authors:  Hidenori Tanaka; Aran Nayebi; Niru Maheswaranathan; Lane McIntosh; Stephen A Baccus; Surya Ganguli
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2019-12

7.  Error-Robust Modes of the Retinal Population Code.

Authors:  Jason S Prentice; Olivier Marre; Mark L Ioffe; Adrianna R Loback; Gašper Tkačik; Michael J Berry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  A predictive focus of gain modulation encodes target trajectories in insect vision.

Authors:  Steven D Wiederman; Joseph M Fabian; James R Dunbier; David C O'Carroll
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Sensitivity to image recurrence across eye-movement-like image transitions through local serial inhibition in the retina.

Authors:  Vidhyasankar Krishnamoorthy; Michael Weick; Tim Gollisch
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Diversity in spatial scope of contrast adaptation among mouse retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Khani; Tim Gollisch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.