Literature DB >> 35282670

Long-term clinical outcomes of type 1 vs. type 2 myocardial infarction in patients who underwent angiography: data from the Korea acute myocardial infarction-national institute of health registry.

Xiongyi Han1,2, Myung Ho Jeong1, Liyan Bai1,2, Joon Ho Ahn1, Dae Young Hyun1, Kyung Hoon Cho1, Min Chul Kim1, Doo Sun Sim1, Young Joon Hong1, Ju Han Kim1, Youngkeun Ahn1.   

Abstract

Background: In the cause of increase the clinical research observational evidence on type 2 myocardial infraction (T2MI), the study compared the characteristics of T2MI and T1MI with respect to major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality as long-term outcomes from a large, nationwide, prospective Korean cohort registry.
Methods: From 13,105 consecutively enrolled individuals in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction-National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH) registry between October 2011 and December 2015, 11,053 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients were divided into the T1MI (n=10,545) and T2MI (n=508) groups. All patients completed ≥3 years of follow-up.
Results: The Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models showed that the cumulative rate of MACE was similar between the 2 groups (11.4% vs. 13.4%, log-rank P=0.185) at 3 years. However, the T2MI group showed higher rates of all-cause death [12.6% vs. 9.4%, log-rank P=0.019; hazard ratio (HR), 1.42; 95% CI: 1.08-1.85; P=0.012] and non-cardiac death (3.5% vs. 5.3%, log-rank P=0.043; HR, 1.55; 95% CI: 1.01-2.37; P=0.043) than the T1MI group. Male sex (HR 1.540; 95% CI: 1.218-1.947, P<0.001), old age (≥65 years; HR, 3.546; 95% CI: 2.645-4.753, P<0.001), low hemoglobin level (<12 g/dL; HR, 2.335; 95% CI: 1.841-2.961, P<0.001), high heart rate (>100 beats/min; HR, 1.852; 95% CI: 1.436-2.388, P<0.001), low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (<60 mL/min/1.73 m2; HR, 2.373; 95% CI: 1.874-3.005, P<0.001), high body mass index (>25 kg/m2; HR, 0.644; 95% CI: 0.514-0.805, P<0.001), and low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (<40%; HR, 1.487; 95% CI: 1.095-2.020, P=0.011) were the independent predictors for 3-year non-cardiac mortality. Conclusions: Although the 2 groups did not differ in MACE, the total mortality rate was higher in T2MI than in T1MI, especially non-cardiac mortality. The independent predictors for non-cardiac mortality were male sex, old age, anemia, low GFR, tachycardia, obesity, and low LVEF. 2022 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiography; myocardial infarction; prognosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35282670      PMCID: PMC8898687          DOI: 10.21037/cdt-21-434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  27 in total

1.  Universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard R Chaitman; Jeroen J Bax; David A Morrow; Harvey D White
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Myocardial Infarction Type 2 and Myocardial Injury.

Authors:  Yader Sandoval; Kristian Thygesen
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 4.  Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Authors:  Yader Sandoval; Allan S Jaffe
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Incident Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Cohort of Patients Undergoing Coronary or Peripheral Arterial Angiography.

Authors:  Hanna K Gaggin; Yuyin Liu; Asya Lyass; Roland R J van Kimmenade; Shweta R Motiwala; Noreen P Kelly; Aditi Mallick; Parul U Gandhi; Nasrien E Ibrahim; Mandy L Simon; Anju Bhardwaj; Arianna M Belcher; Jamie E Harisiades; Joseph M Massaro; Ralph B D'Agostino; James L Januzzi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Type 2 myocardial infarction in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tomasz Baron; Kristina Hambraeus; Johan Sundström; David Erlinge; Tomas Jernberg; Bertil Lindahl
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Treatment and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury compared with type 1 myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Pritha Subramanyam; Eugenia Gianos; Harmony R Reynolds; Binita Shah; Steven P Sedlis
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.439

8.  Short-Term Prognosis of Myocardial Injury, Type 1, and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Unit.

Authors:  Alain Putot; Sophie Buet Derrida; Marianne Zeller; Aurélie Avondo; Patrick Ray; Patrick Manckoundia; Yves Cottin
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  The impact of the 2007 ESC-ACC-AHA-WHF Universal definition on the incidence and classification of acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tor Melberg; Robert Burman; Kenneth Dickstein
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Comparison between type-2 and type-1 myocardial infarction: clinical features, treatment strategies and outcomes.

Authors:  Angel López-Cuenca; Miriam Gómez-Molina; Pedro J Flores-Blanco; Marianela Sánchez-Martínez; Andrea García-Narbon; Ignacio De Las Heras-Gómez; María J Sánchez-Galian; Esther Guerrero-Pérez; Mariano Valdés; Sergio Manzano-Fernández
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.