Literature DB >> 29753793

Short-Term Prognosis of Myocardial Injury, Type 1, and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Unit.

Alain Putot1, Sophie Buet Derrida2, Marianne Zeller3, Aurélie Avondo4, Patrick Ray4, Patrick Manckoundia5, Yves Cottin6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 2 myocardial infarction and nonischemic myocardial injury, corresponding to troponin elevation without atherothrombosis, are emerging concepts suspected of being common in emergency departments (ED). However, their respective frequencies, risk profiles, and short-term prognoses remain to be investigated.
METHODS: Among all the patients admitted from January 2014 to December 2016 in a university hospital ED (n = 33,669), those with elevated conventional troponin Ic (≥0.10 µg/L) (n = 4436, 13%) were systematically adjudicated as having type 1 or type 2 myocardial infarction in the presence of symptoms or signs of myocardial ischemia (typical chest pain or electrocardiographic changes) or myocardial injury without such signs.
RESULTS: Among the 4436 patients included, 1453 (33%) were classified as having myocardial injury, 947 (21%) as having type 2 and 2036 (46%) as having type 1 myocardial infarction. Compared with type 1 patients, patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury were markedly older (respective median ages: 67, 81, and 84 years; P < .001) with more frequent comorbidities. In multivariate analysis, myocardial injury was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death (odds ratio 43; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.65; P < .001) but a higher risk of all-cause in-hospital death (odds ratio 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.00; P = .037). Systolic blood pressure <90mm Hg and heart rate >100 beats per minute at admission were strongly associated with all-cause mortality, and the troponin rate was associated with cardiovascular mortality in all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large study of patients with elevated troponins in an ED, myocardial injury and type 2 myocardial infarction were frequent and associated with a worse in-hospital prognosis than type 1 myocardial infarction resulting from noncardiovascular events.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Causes of death; In-hospital mortality; Myocardial injury; Prognosis; Sepsis; Type 2 myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29753793     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  13 in total

Review 1.  Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: Evolving Approaches to Diagnosis and Risk-Stratification.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Yader Sandoval
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Long-term clinical outcomes of type 1 vs. type 2 myocardial infarction in patients who underwent angiography: data from the Korea acute myocardial infarction-national institute of health registry.

Authors:  Xiongyi Han; Myung Ho Jeong; Liyan Bai; Joon Ho Ahn; Dae Young Hyun; Kyung Hoon Cho; Min Chul Kim; Doo Sun Sim; Young Joon Hong; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-02

3.  Wake Forest University long-term follow-up of type 2 myocardial infarction: The Wake-Up T2MI Registry.

Authors:  Hanumantha R Jogu; Sameer Arora; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Arman Qamar; Ambarish Pandey; Parag A Chevli; Tusharkumar H Pansuriya; Muhammad I Ahmad; Abhishek Dutta; Padageshwar R Sunkara; Waqas Qureshi; Sujethra Vasu; Bharathi Upadhya; Deepak L Bhatt; James L Januzzi; David Herrington
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  A systematic review on the triggers and clinical features of type 2 myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Guangqiang Wang; Na Zhao; Shu Zhong; Jianping Li
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Geriatric Population-based Model of Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Alain Putot; Melanie Jeanmichel; Frederic Chague; Patrick Manckoundia; Yves Cottin; Marianne Zeller
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.745

6.  Type 1 or Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in Patients with a History of Coronary Artery Disease: Data from the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Alain Putot; Mélanie Jeanmichel; Frédéric Chagué; Aurélie Avondo; Patrick Ray; Patrick Manckoundia; Marianne Zeller; Yves Cottin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Treatment With Cardiovascular Medications: Prognosis in Patients With Myocardial Injury.

Authors:  Erik Kadesjö; Andreas Roos; Anwar J Siddiqui; Ulrik Sartipy; Martin J Holzmann
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Troponin elevation pattern and subsequent cardiac and non-cardiac outcomes: Implementing the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction and high-sensitivity troponin at a population level.

Authors:  Anthony Ming-Yu Chuang; Mau T Nguyen; Ehsan Khan; Dylan Jones; Matthew Horsfall; Sam Lehman; Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Kristina Lambrakis; Martin Than; Julian Vaile; Ajay Sinhal; John K French; Derek P Chew
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Unusual aetiology of a type 2 myocardial infarction: a case-based review.

Authors:  David Toma; Tania-Emima Toma; Cristina Bologa; Cătălina Lionte
Journal:  Arh Hig Rada Toksikol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 1.948

10.  Clinical characteristics and outcome of elderly patients admitted in emergency department with an oxygen mismatch and type 2 myocardial infarction or myocardial injury.

Authors:  Laurent Jacquin; Nathan Mewton; Stéphanie Bosne; Adrien Mantout; Cyrille Bergerot; Karim Tazarourte; Marion Douplat
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 3.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.