| Literature DB >> 35282308 |
Aumaporn Arlai1, Kanitha Tananuwong2.
Abstract
Effects of starch formulation, highly concentrated sucrose solution, and coconut milk on the stability of starch gels kept under chilled and frozen conditions were determined. Gels containing rice starch (RS), tapioca starch (TS) (RS:TS of 1 : 0.85), and hydroxypropyl distarch phosphate (HDP, 0-50% of total starch) were prepared from 15% starch suspension using water, 45°Brix sucrose syrup or coconut milk as liquid media. After aging at 4°C for 21 days, starch gels had higher hardness and chewiness, with lower cohesiveness and springiness (p ≤ 0.05). Water-based gels containing HDP had less extent of texture hardening, lower degree of crystallinity, and more homogeneous microstructure during 4°C aging. However, for the starch gels in sucrose syrup or coconut milk, HDP induced greater gel hardening, higher degree of crystallinity, and denser gel microstructure during chilled storage. This could be due to the crystallization of sucrose or lipid/amylose-lipid complexes. Nevertheless, HDP enhanced freeze-thaw stability of the gels, regardless of the liquid media used (p ≤ 0.05). According to the consumer test of the model desserts subjected to a single freeze-thaw cycle, the sample containing 50% HDP gel in sucrose syrup or 25% HDP gel in coconut milk gained the highest hedonic score of texture and overall acceptance (p ≤ 0.05).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35282308 PMCID: PMC8904907 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9454229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Composition of starch blends used in this study.
| Hydroxypropylated distarch phosphate substitution level (%) | Weight ratio of rice starch | Weight ratio of tapioca starch | Weight ratio of hydroxypropylated distarch phosphate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 54.0 | 46.0 | 0.0 |
| 25 | 40.5 | 34.5 | 25.0 |
| 50 | 27.0 | 23.0 | 50.0 |
Figure 1Appearance of the model desserts prepared in water (a), 45°Bx sucrose solution (b), and coconut milk (c).
Textural parameters of the freshly prepared starch gels and the gels stored at 4°C for 21 days.
| Starch gels | Textural parameters of the starch gels | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freshly prepared gels | Aged at 4°C for 21 days | |||||||
| Hardness ( | Springinessns | Cohesivenessns | Chewiness ( | Hardness ( | Springiness | Cohesivenessns | Chewiness ( | |
| Water | ||||||||
| 0% HDP | 15.11d ± 0.49 | 0.85 ± 0.02 | 0.84 ± 0.01 | 10.79c ± 0.19 | 24.63e ± 1.90 (+63.00g ± 0.80) | 0.78a ± 0.03 (−8.24c ± 0.29) | 0.84 ± 0.01 (0) | 16.14d ± 0.09 (+49.58d ± 1.17) |
| 25% HDP | 14.32de ± 1.01 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 9.63d ± 0.26 | 19.85f ± 1.29 (+38.61h ± 1.06) | 0.76a ± 0.04 (−8.43c ± 0.14) | 0.80 ± 0.03 (−1.23c ± 0.12) | 12.07f ± 0.54 (+25.36g ± 1.04) |
| 50% HDP | 13.34f ± 0.95 | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 8.97e ± 0.13 | 17.84g ± 0.69 (+33.73i ± 0.84) | 0.76a ± 0.05 (−7.32d ± 0.18) | 0.81 ± 0.04 (−1.22c ± 0.26) | 10.98g ± 0.08 (+22.44h ± 0.88) |
| 45°Bx sucrose solution | ||||||||
| 0% HDP | 23.67a ± 0.48 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 0.83 ± 0.06 | 16.31a ± 0.65 | 39.89b ± 4.17 (+68.52f ± 1.55) | 0.67b ± 0.05 (−19.28a ± 0.35) | 0.81 ± 0.05 (−2.41b ± 0.18) | 21.65b ± 0.87 (+32.76f ± 1.08) |
| 25% HDP | 19.95b ± 0.54 | 0.81 ± 0.02 | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 13.25b ± 0.17 | 34.58bc ± 3.46 (+73.33e ± 1.40) | 0.66b ± 0.05 (−18.52a ± 0.54) | 0.80 ± 0.12 (−2.44b ± 0.16) | 18.26c ± 0.62 (+37.79e ± 1.03) |
| 50% HDP | 11.13h ± 0.47 | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 0.81 ± 0.05 | 7.39f ± 0.08 | 29.37d ± 3.66 (+163.88a ± 1.89) | 0.69b ± 0.02 (−15.85b ± 0.17) | 0.79 ± 0.10 (−2.47b ± 0.11) | 16.01e ± 0.95 (+116.56a ± 3.72) |
| Coconut milk | ||||||||
| 0% HDP | 23.99a ± 0.39 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 16.53a ± 0.10 | 46.10a ± 1.76 (+92.16d ± 0.95) | 0.77a ± 0.08 (−7.23d ± 0.36) | 0.83 ± 0.02 (0) | 29.46a ± 1.11 (+78.27c ± 1.19) |
| 25% HDP | 16.99e ± 1.70 | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.03 | 11.56c ± 0.45 | 33.01c ± 4.17 (+94.29c ± 1.23) | 0.76a ± 0.05 (−7.32d ± 0.20) | 0.82 ± 0.06 (−1.20c ± 0.28) | 20.57b ± 0.98 (+77.90c ± 0.92) |
| 50% HDP | 10.67g ± 0.23 | 0.84 ± 0.05 | 0.84 ± 0.02 | 7.53f ± 0.21 | 24.65e ± 2.01 (+131.02b ± 1.72) | 0.78a ± 0.06 (−7.14d ± 0.57) | 0.81 ± 0.05 (−3.57a ± 0.25) | 15.57e ± 0.86 (+106.86a ± 4.84) |
a,b,…Mean values with different letters in the same column were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). For the aged starch gels, data in the brackets represented the percentage of changes based on that of the freshly prepared gels. The gels were prepared from starch blends as shown in Table 1. HDP: hydroxypropylated distarch phosphate.
Figure 2X-ray diffractograms of the starch gels in water (a), 45°Bx sucrose solution (b), or coconut milk (c) after storage at 4oC for 21 days. The gels were prepared with the starch blends containing different levels of HDP substitution as shown in Table 1.
Figure 3Microstructure of the aged starch gels containing 0%HDP (a, d, g), 25%HDP (b, e, h), and 50%HDP (c, f, i). The gels were prepared in water (a–c), 45°Bx sucrose solution (d–f), or coconut milk (g–i) and kept at 4°C for 21 days.
Degree of crystallinity of the starch gels stored at 4°C for 21 days.
| Aqueous media used for gel preparation | Degree of crystallinity of the gels containing different level of HDP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 25% | 50% | |
| Water | 5.86g ± 0.05 | 5.59h ± 0.12 | 4.85i ± 0.13 |
| 45°Bx sucrose solution | 64.77c ± 0.24 | 68.64b ± 0.55 | 73.37a ± 0.43 |
| Coconut milk | 5.43f ± 0.32 | 5.73e ± 0.16 | 6.41d ± 0.14 |
a,b…For all 9 treatments, mean values with different letters were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). The gels were prepared from starch blends as shown in Table 1. HDP: hydroxypropylated distarch phosphate.
Degree of syneresis of the frozen starch gels after freezing and thawing up to 5 cycles.
| Starch gels | Degree of syneresis (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 cycle | 2 cycles | 3 cycles | 4 cycles | 5 cycles | |
| Water | |||||
| 0% HDP | 14.94a ± 1.52 | 34.07a ± 3.58 | 38.43a ± 4.55 | 42.97a ± 3.48 | 43.49a ± 0.87 |
| 25% HDP | 0 | 29.92b ± 4.68 | 36.37b ± 3.50 | 40.24b ± 0.85 | 41.36b ± 2.90 |
| 50% HDP | 0 | 22.91c ± 4.29 | 34.15c ± 1.20 | 38.05c ± 3.02 | 40.67b ± 2.81 |
| 45°Bx sucrose solution | |||||
| 0% HDP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.95f ± 1.54 |
| 25% HDP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.16f ± 2.01 |
| 50% HDP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.38h ± 0.67 |
| Coconut milk | |||||
| 0% HDP | 0 | 22.15c ± 5.35 | 29.44d ± 2.68 | 33.55d ± 0.65 | 35.32c ± 2.53 |
| 25% HDP | 0 | 17.51d ± 2.67 | 24.57e ± 5.81 | 27.23e ± 0.79 | 30.32d ± 1.96 |
| 50% HDP | 0 | 13.40e ± 2.72 | 18.09f ± 6.83 | 19.68f ± 2.91 | 22.28e ± 3.09 |
a,b…Mean values with different letters in the same column were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). The gels were prepared from starch blends as shown in Table 1. HDP: hydroxypropylated distarch phosphate.
Figure 4Microstructure of the frozen starch gels containing 0%HDP (a, d, g, j, m, p), 25%HDP (b, e, h, k, n, q), and 50%HDP (c, f, i, l, o, r). The gels were prepared in water (a–f), 45°Bx sucrose solution (g–l), or coconut milk (m–r) and subjected to 1 (a–c, g–i, m–o) or 5 (d–f, j–l, p–r) freeze-thaw cycles.
Hedonic scores of the freshly prepared and frozen model dessert using different formulations of starch blends and aqueous media.
| Dessert samples | Freshly prepared dessert | Frozen dessert subjected to 1 freeze-thaw cycle | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Color | Flavor | Softness | Overall acceptability | Appearance | Color | Flavor | Softness | Overall acceptability | |
| Water | ||||||||||
| 0%HDP | 8.30c ± 0.11 | 8.50b ± 0.09 | 8.00b ± 0.08 | 8.00c ± 0.18 | 8.00c ± 0.08 | 7.80c ± 0.12 | 8.00a ± 0.13 | 8.00b ± 0.13 | 7.70d ± 0.12 | 7.70c ± 0.12 |
| 25%HDP | 8.38c ± 0.13 | 8.57b ± 0.09 | 8.10b ± 0.08 | 8.30b ± 0.11 | 8.20bc ± 0.09 | 8.38b ± 0.10 | 8.20a ± 0.21 | 8.20b ± 0.11 | 8.00c ± 0.08 | 8.00b ± 0.13 |
| 50%HDP | 8.30c ± 0.09 | 8.20c ± 0.22 | 8.00b ± 0.10 | 7.80c ± 0.20 | 8.00c ± 0.08 | 8.30b ± 0.11 | 8.20a ± 0.21 | 8.00b ± 0.13 | 8.30b ± 0.11 | 8.00b ± 0.13 |
| 45°Bx sucrose solution | ||||||||||
| 0%HDP | 8.60b ± 0.15 | 8.89a ± 0.22 | 8.50a ± 0.27 | 7.00c ± 0.08 | 7.50d ± 0.21 | 8.60ab ± 0.18 | 8.00a ± 0.13 | 8.50a ± 0.23 | 7.00e ± 0.21 | 7.00d ± 0.21 |
| 25%HDP | 8.50bc ± 0.12 | 8.78a ± 0.14 | 8.45a ± 0.22 | 8.50ab ± 0.14 | 8.20bc ± 0.09 | 8.50ab ± 0.12 | 8.10a ± 0.13 | 8.45ab ± 0.21 | 8.00c ± 0.08 | 8.00b ± 0.13 |
| 50%HDP | 8.55bc ± 0.17 | 8.75a ± 0.14 | 8.50a ± 0.30 | 8.50ab ± 0.14 | 8.70a ± 0.13 | 8.55ab ± 0.17 | 8.20a ± 0.21 | 8.50a ± 0.23 | 8.50ab ± 0.12 | 8.50a ± 0.12 |
| Coconut milk | ||||||||||
| 0%HDP | 8.70ab ± 0.11 | 8.89a ± 0.21 | 8.60a ± 0.26 | 8.70a ± 0.10 | 8.50bc ± 0.21 | 8.70a ± 0.20 | 8.00a ± 0.13 | 8.50a ± 0.23 | 8.00c ± 0.08 | 8.00b ± 0.13 |
| 25%HDP | 8.80a ± 0.07 | 8.78a ± 0.12 | 8.65a ± 0.23 | 8.80a ± 0.09 | 8.70a ± 0.13 | 8.72a ± 0.18 | 8.00a ± 0.13 | 8.60a ± 0.23 | 8.60a ± 0.18 | 8.72a ± 0.18 |
| 50%HDP | 8.85a ± 0.10 | 8.75a ± 0.15 | 8.60a ± 0.25 | 8.85a ± 0.12 | 8.90a ± 0.18 | 8.69a ± 0.18 | 8.15a ± 0.21 | 8.60a ± 0.23 | 8.80a ± 0.12 | 8.61a ± 0.18 |
a,b…Mean values with different letters in the same column were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05). Hedonic scores were reported in the 9-point scale; 1 = dislike extremely, 9 = like extremely. The gels were prepared from starch blends as shown in Table 1. HDP: hydroxypropylated distarch phosphate.