| Literature DB >> 35281397 |
Mostafa Shanbehzadeh1, Raoof Nopour2, Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: From December 2019, atypical pneumonia termed COVID-19 has been increasing exponentially across the world. It poses a great threat and challenge to world health and the economy. Medical specialists face uncertainty in making decisions based on their judgment for COVID-19. Thus, this study aimed to establish an intelligent model based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) for diagnosing COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligent; COVID-19; coronavirus; decision support systems; machine learning; neural network
Year: 2022 PMID: 35281397 PMCID: PMC8893090 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_387_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
Figure 1Flowchart describing patient selection
Figure 2The schema of an artificial neural network used in diagnosing COVID-19
The key diagnostic criteria at P<0.05
| Input variable | Variable type | Variable features with frequency | Correlation coefficient |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respiratory rate | Binominal | ≤24 (128) | 0.245 | 0.000265 |
| Body temperature | Polynomial | <37.3 (199) | 0.554 | 0.005405 |
| SPO2 | Polynomial | >95% (274) | 0.327 | 0.0093105 |
| Shortness of breathing | Binominal | Haven’t (285) | 0.198 | 0.00124 |
| Fever | Binominal | Haven’t (244) | 0.545 | 0.00512 |
| Cough | Binominal | Haven’t (229) | 0.621 | 0.00405 |
| Digestive sign (diarrhea) | Binominal | Haven’t (296) | 0.114 | 0.0269847 |
| Chest pain | Binominal | Haven’t (285) | 0.074 | 0.0301 |
| Weakness | Binominal | Haven’t (280) | 0.138 | 0.002515 |
| Contact type | Polynomial | Haven’t (272) | −0.479 | 0.007755 |
| Contact number | Binominal | Complete (100) | −0.411 | 0.00695 |
| Contact history | Binominal | Haven’t (276) | 0.172 | 0.019 |
| History of respiratory failure | Nominal | Haven’t (262) | 0.3 | 0.0159 |
| History of taking the blocker drugs | Nominal | Haven’t (301) | 0.130 | 0.0219 |
| Pulmonary lesion existence | Nominal | Haven’t (235) | 0.6 | 0.00258 |
| Pulmonary infection | Nominal | Haven’t (288) | 0.146 | 0.000125 |
| History of traveling to high-risk COVID-19 occurrence | Nominal | Haven’t (302) | 0.130 | 0.0212 |
| Age | Polynomial | Young (<45) (125) | 0.110 | 0.0105 |
SPO2=Oxygen saturation in the blood rate
The performance of some artificial neural network configuration
| Network type | Layer 1 | Layer 2 | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.212 | 0.91 | 0.6125 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.532 | 0.9 | 0.6725 |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | 0.996 | 0.02 | 0.63 |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | 0.992 | 0.02 | 0.6275 |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | 0.74 | 0.33 | 0.5875 |
| 6 | 6 | 0 | 0.996 | 0 | 0.6225 |
| 7 | 7 | 0 | 0.884 | 0.12 | 0.6 |
| 8 | 8 | 0 | 0.804 | 0.42 | 0.66 |
| 9 | 9 | 0 | 0.42 | 0.8 | 0.565 |
| 10 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.635 |
Figure 3Final artificial neural network architecture used for COVID-19 diagnosis with the best performance
Figure 4The artificial neural networks mean squared error for error rate evaluation
Figure 5The receiver operating characteristic of artificial neural networks in diagnosing COVID-19
Figure 6All situations of the artificial neural networks confusion matrix
Figure 7The Clinical Decision Support System User Interface is based on artificial neural networks for COVID-19 diagnosis