| Literature DB >> 35280704 |
Baojian Wei1,2, Chunyu Li1, Jiangye Xu3.
Abstract
In order to explore the relationship between intelligent image recognition technology and the mentality and quality of life of the elderly, this paper combines intelligent image simulation technology to identify the behavior of the elderly, protect the safety of the elderly, and provide timely feedback on the adverse conditions of the elderly. Moreover, this paper improves the traditional intelligent image recognition algorithm, verifies the research method of this paper through experimental research, and puts forward corresponding suggestions. Through investigation and research, we can see that the level of health literacy of elderly patients with chronic diseases is low. Therefore, in the future health education, we should strengthen health education for elderly patients with chronic diseases, use different mass media to propagate health knowledge, and promote the formation of healthy lifestyles and behaviors for elderly patients with chronic diseases. At the same time, the experiment also verified that the intelligent image recognition technology proposed in this paper has a positive effect in improving the mentality and quality of life of the elderly.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35280704 PMCID: PMC8890847 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9984873
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
Figure 1Comparison of the statistical characteristics of the gradient amplitude between the screen behavior image and the natural behavior image.
Figure 2Gradient direction comparison.
Figure 3Convolution kernel in 12 directions.
Figure 4System architecture diagram.
Health literacy scores of elderly patients with chronic diseases (n = 382).
| Dimension | Reference range | Score |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | Max | |||
| Total health literacy | 0–96 | 28 | 89 | 57.60 ± 21.96 |
| Information access capacity | 0–36 | 14 | 32 | 21.64 ± 8.82 |
| Communication and interaction capacity | 0–36 | 17 | 33 | 21.07 ± 7.93 |
| Willingness to improve health | 0–16 | 6 | 15 | 10.01 ± 4.02 |
| Willingness for financial support | 0–8 | 2 | 8 | 4.88 ± 2.64 |
Relevance (r) of depression, daily living ability, and health literacy scores.
| Basic daily living ability | Functional daily living ability | Health literacy | Depression | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic daily living ability | 1 | |||
| Functional daily living ability | 0.610a | 1 | ||
| Health literacy | 0.398a | 0.563a | 1 | |
| Depression | −0.200a | −0.298a | −0.374a | 1 |
Note: P < 0.001.
Tests of the intermediary variables of health literacy.
| Step | Dependent variable | Independent variable |
| SE |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | Daily activity ability | Depression | −0.408 | 0.027 | −0.502 | −10.821a | 0.324 | 209.412 |
| Step 2 | Health literacy | Depression | −0.284 | 0.026 | −0.446 | −8.776a | 0.184 | 96.078 |
| Step 3 | Daily activity ability | Depression | −0.276 | 0.033 | −0.388a | −9.014a | 0.521 | 232.416 |
| Health literacy | 0.522 | 0.042 | 0.482a | 12.084a |
Note: P < 0.001.
Statistical table of model effect evaluation.
| Number | Mental health improvement effect | Quality of life improvement effect | Customer satisfaction | Number | Mental health improvement effect | Quality of life improvement effect | Customer satisfaction | Number | Mental health improvement effect | Quality of life improvement effect | Customer satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 84.1 | 79.7 | 90.9 | 21 | 84.1 | 82.5 | 94.4 | 41 | 89.7 | 85.4 | 93.9 |
| 2 | 88.2 | 87.3 | 92.1 | 22 | 82.7 | 99.9 | 87.6 | 42 | 83.3 | 94.0 | 89.4 |
| 3 | 78.7 | 79.9 | 96.1 | 23 | 81.3 | 84.7 | 93.5 | 43 | 84.9 | 99.7 | 96.9 |
| 4 | 78.3 | 79.7 | 86.0 | 24 | 89.1 | 85.1 | 93.1 | 44 | 91.3 | 94.7 | 93.5 |
| 5 | 88.0 | 86.2 | 89.3 | 25 | 82.6 | 84.3 | 93.9 | 45 | 87.4 | 82.1 | 89.0 |
| 6 | 82.1 | 88.1 | 91.5 | 26 | 90.1 | 97.8 | 92.2 | 46 | 86.1 | 81.7 | 88.2 |
| 7 | 80.1 | 95.9 | 87.7 | 27 | 78.8 | 96.6 | 96.7 | 47 | 85.4 | 97.5 | 94.0 |
| 8 | 86.7 | 90.9 | 93.1 | 28 | 89.3 | 80.4 | 86.3 | 48 | 86.8 | 84.2 | 86.0 |
| 9 | 89.7 | 95.7 | 96.6 | 29 | 78.6 | 85.3 | 94.1 | 49 | 84.7 | 86.7 | 94.5 |
| 10 | 88.5 | 86.3 | 89.2 | 30 | 83.2 | 79.9 | 96.1 | 50 | 84.3 | 80.9 | 96.4 |
| 11 | 89.7 | 95.7 | 92.9 | 31 | 88.5 | 99.9 | 92.5 | 51 | 88.6 | 99.1 | 96.9 |
| 12 | 85.7 | 90.3 | 89.3 | 32 | 90.6 | 93.1 | 94.6 | 52 | 89.7 | 99.2 | 92.1 |
| 13 | 90.9 | 80.9 | 87.3 | 33 | 80.2 | 97.2 | 95.4 | 53 | 91.0 | 88.4 | 92.4 |
| 14 | 89.3 | 89.0 | 96.9 | 34 | 84.8 | 98.6 | 93.5 | 54 | 80.2 | 96.6 | 85.2 |
| 15 | 82.9 | 88.0 | 86.6 | 35 | 86.2 | 92.7 | 95.8 | 55 | 78.4 | 82.7 | 88.0 |
| 16 | 86.7 | 95.7 | 88.6 | 36 | 82.9 | 84.7 | 92.2 | 56 | 82.2 | 92.1 | 93.0 |
| 17 | 88.8 | 84.0 | 92.5 | 37 | 81.7 | 93.6 | 93.8 | 57 | 84.3 | 99.8 | 89.1 |
| 18 | 86.6 | 86.7 | 88.4 | 38 | 80.5 | 90.7 | 93.9 | 58 | 91.3 | 92.0 | 92.3 |
| 19 | 88.9 | 80.4 | 90.8 | 39 | 91.8 | 87.2 | 94.8 | 59 | 80.2 | 88.8 | 91.6 |
| 20 | 90.4 | 87.8 | 85.1 | 40 | 84.3 | 95.3 | 86.7 | 60 | 90.2 | 85.7 | 89.8 |
Figure 5Statistical diagram of model effect evaluation.