Literature DB >> 35280410

IL-1B can serve as a healing process and is a critical regulator of diabetic foot ulcer.

Mei-She Gan1,2, Bin Yang1, Da-Lang Fang3, Biao-Liang Wu2.   

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is the main cause of disability in diabetic patients. However, the molecular changes underlying the occurrence and progression of DFU remain unclear. We conducted this study to examine gene alterations in different DFU patients.
Methods: GSE143735 and GSE134431 transcriptome data sets were acquired from the Gene Expression Omnibus database, and differential expression analyses of the genes in these data sets were performed. A functional enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was performed using clusterProfiler package in R. To examine the correlations between DEGs and significant immune-related genes, we identified the intersecting ulcer-related DEGs, healing-related DEGs, and immune-related DEGs. Finally, we further investigate the relationship between the selected genes with immune cell regulation via a single-sample gene set enrichment analysis, and the infiltration of 28 immune cells in common diabetes samples, unhealed DFU samples, and healed samples DFU were compared.
Results: We found 238 upregulated genes and 207 downregulated genes in the diabetic foot (DF) patients with ulcers compared to the DF patients without ulcers, and 74 upregulated genes and 28 downregulated genes in the healed samples compared to the unhealed samples. To examine the main biological functions, we conducted a functional enrichment analysis. The results showed that the biological functions of functional enrichment analysis included neutrophil degranulation, leukocyte chemotaxis, myeloid leukocyte migration, phagosome, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and the chemokine signaling pathway. Interleukin (IL)-1B was more highly expressed in patients with ulcers and healed DFU patients than those without ulcers and unhealed DFU patients. Finally, the immune cell abundance difference results showed that activated cluster of differentiation (CD)8 T cells, central memory CD8 T cells, T follicular helper cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, natural killer T cells and monocytes were more highly infiltrated in normal diabetes patients and healed DFU patients than unhealed DFU patients. However, no difference was found between DF patients with and without ulcers. Conclusions: IL-1B is an inflammation gene that can be used to assess and regulate DFU progression. 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU); healing process; interleukin-1B (IL-1B)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35280410      PMCID: PMC8908170          DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Approximately 3.6 million people in Britain have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM), and it is estimated that this figure will increase to 5.0 million in the next 10 years (1). Despite the better management of these DM patients, the risk of DM complications also increases with time. Devastating macrovascular complications (e.g., cardiovascular disease) and microvascular complications (e.g., diabetic kidney disease, diabetic retinopathy, and neuropathy) increase the mortality of DM patients (1). Such complications may be correlated to gene alterations (1). In Western countries, the annual incidence of foot ulceration in the diabetic population is around 2% (2). Diabetic foot (DF) is one of the most common end-point complications of diabetes (2). More than 2/3 of non-traumatic lower limb amputations are preceded by an ulcer (84%); thus, this pivotal event could enable early treatment (3). Among of the end-point complications, peripheral artery disease and neuropathy are the main causes of foot ulcers. These complications often act in combination, but can also act alone. DM patients with artery disease and neuropathy are asymptomatic in the early stages of DF, but as the disease develops, it causes chronic non-healing foot ulcers. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a major medical and economic problem for health management agencies and clinical doctors globally. The regulators underlying DFU development and the healing process need to be urgently understood to enable the early diagnosis of DFU and the development of novel treatment methods. Aside from the main etiological factors, several factors also have critical roles in the occurrence and processes of DFU, including abnormal gene alterations, immune cell infiltration, and inflammation (4-6). Wu et al. found that the downregulation of endothelium and lymphocyte associated ASCH domain 1 (EOLA1) expression exacerbated DFU by enhancing the inflammatory pathway activity, and also detected differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including metallothionein 2A and interleukin (IL)-6 (6). Inflammation has been proven to be an important biological process in DFU (7,8). Various immune cells and cytokines drive the inflammation response. The M1 and M2 macrophage ratio was found to be more dysregulated in the skin of diabetic rabbits than control rabbits (7). Sawaya et al. found the FOXM1 inhibits immune cell infiltration in the DFU microenvironment and promotes the healing process (5). During the inflammation response, the activated inflammatory cells can produce several pro-inflammatory cytokines. Dinh et al. showed that unhealed DFU patients had higher expression levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, and matrix metallopeptidase 9 than in healed DFU patients (9). Thus, immune cell infiltration and the production of cytokines play a regulatory role in the DFU healing process. In this study, we sought to investigate differential gene expression, significant immune gene expression levels, and immune cell infiltration differences between healed and non-healed DFU patients. Through the study of these immune-related DEGs and the immune cells infiltration of healed DFU, we try to find the potential targets for the treatment of DFU. We present the following article in accordance with the STREGA reporting checklist (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-75/rc).

Methods

Raw data acquisition

The GSE143735 (comprising 4 common diabetes samples, 4 unhealed DFU samples, and 5 healed DFU samples) and GSE134431 (comprising 8 common diabetes samples, 6 unhealed DFU samples, and 7 healed DFU samples) transcriptome data sets were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The transcriptome data were merged and normalized for further analysis. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).

DEGs associated with DFU

To identify the ulcer-related DEGs in DFU, we first analyzed the differential expression between the samples with and without ulcers. We then analyzed the differential expression between the healed and unhealed samples to identify the healing-related DEGs in DFU.

Functional enrichment analysis of ulcer-related DEGs and healing-related DEGs in DFU

We performed gene ontology (GO) functional and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) functional enrichment analyses of ulcer-related DEGs and healing-related DEGs through the clusterProfiler package in R, and used the ggplot2 package to present the results.

Intersection genes for ulcer-related DEGs and healing-related DEGs and immune-related genes

An immune-related gene list was downloaded from ImmPort. The intersection genes for the ulcer-related DEGs, healing-related DEGs, and immune-related genes were considered hub biomarkers and used for further analysis.

Immune infiltration analysis

We conducted a single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) to analyze the immune landscapes of the DF patients. The ssGSEA is a machine learning algorithm that characterizes intratumoral immune landscapes and that can identify the expression of 28 kinds of immune cells. We compared the infiltration of 28 immune cells in common diabetes samples, unhealed DFU samples, and healed DFU samples. We also analyzed the relationship between the abundance of the 28 immune cells and the expression of immune-related hub biomarkers in DFU.

Statistical analysis

All of the statistical analyses were performed in R software. The difference analysis and correlation analysis were performed by Wilcoxon and Spearman correlations, respectively. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

PCA of raw transcriptome data before and after data normalization

The principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that before normalization, the principal component of the gene expressions of the GSE143735 and GSE143431 data sets differed significantly (); however, the principal components of the gene expressions of these 2 data sets were at the same level after standardization ().
Figure 1

PCA analysis of raw transcriptome data before and after data normalization. (A) PCA analysis of data before data normalization; (B) PCA analysis of after data normalization. Purple represents the principal component of GSE143735, and green represents the principal component of GSE134431. PCA, principal component analysis.

PCA analysis of raw transcriptome data before and after data normalization. (A) PCA analysis of data before data normalization; (B) PCA analysis of after data normalization. Purple represents the principal component of GSE143735, and green represents the principal component of GSE134431. PCA, principal component analysis.

Ulcer-related DEGs and healing-related DEGs in DFU

The ulcer-related DEG analysis showed that compared to patients without ulcers, 238 genes were upregulated and 207 genes were downregulated in the ulcer samples (). The healing-related analysis indicated that compared to the unhealed patients, 74 genes were upregulated and 28 genes were downregulated in the healed samples ().
Figure 2

Ulcer-related DEGs in DFU. (A) Heatmap of the top 50 ulcer-related DEGs in DFU; (B) volcano plot of all the ulcer-related DEGs; red and green represent the upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. DEGs, differential expressed genes; DFU, diabetic foot ulcer.

Figure 3

Healing-related DEGs in DFU. (A) Heatmap of the top 50 healing-related DEGs in DFU; (B) volcano plot of all the healing-related DEGs; red and green represent the upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. DEGs, differential expressed genes; DFU, diabetic foot ulcer.

Ulcer-related DEGs in DFU. (A) Heatmap of the top 50 ulcer-related DEGs in DFU; (B) volcano plot of all the ulcer-related DEGs; red and green represent the upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. DEGs, differential expressed genes; DFU, diabetic foot ulcer. Healing-related DEGs in DFU. (A) Heatmap of the top 50 healing-related DEGs in DFU; (B) volcano plot of all the healing-related DEGs; red and green represent the upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively. DEGs, differential expressed genes; DFU, diabetic foot ulcer.

Functional enrichment analysis results of the ulcer-related DEGs

The results of the GO functional enrichment analysis of the ulcer-related DEGs indicated that the top 5 biological processes (BPs) of DFU were translational initiation, viral gene expression, the nuclear-transcribed messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) catabolic process, viral transcription, and the signal-recognition particle (SRP)-dependent co-translational protein targeting of the membrane, while the top 5 cell components (CCs) were focal adhesion, the cell-substrate junction, the cytosolic ribosome, the ribosome, and the ribosomal subunit, and the top 5 molecular functions (MFs) were the structural constituent of the ribosome, sulfur compound binding, glycosaminoglycan binding, heparin binding, and ribosomal RNA binding ().
Figure 4

Functional enrichment analysis results of ulcer-related DEGs. (A) Bubble diagram of GO functional enrichment analysis, including the biological process, cell components, and molecular functions; (B) circle diagram of the specifically enriched genes involved in the biological processes; (C) bubble diagram of the top 10 KEGG pathways; (D) circle diagram of the specifically enriched genes in the top 5 pathways. The size of the bubble represents the number of enriched genes, and the color represents the q value. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Functional enrichment analysis results of ulcer-related DEGs. (A) Bubble diagram of GO functional enrichment analysis, including the biological process, cell components, and molecular functions; (B) circle diagram of the specifically enriched genes involved in the biological processes; (C) bubble diagram of the top 10 KEGG pathways; (D) circle diagram of the specifically enriched genes in the top 5 pathways. The size of the bubble represents the number of enriched genes, and the color represents the q value. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. The results of the KEGG functional enrichment analysis of the ulcer-related DEGs revealed that top the top 10 enriched KEGG pathways were coronavirus disease 2019, ribosome, proteoglycans in cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis, the hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) signaling pathway, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, the ErbB signaling pathway, complement and coagulation cascades, and bladder cancer ().

Functional enrichment analysis results of the healing-related DEGs

The results of the GO functional enrichment analysis of the healing-related DEGs indicated that the top 5 BPs in DFU were neutrophil degranulation, neutrophil activation involved in the immune response, leukocyte chemotaxis, cell chemotaxis, and myeloid leukocyte migration, while the top 5 CCs were the secretory granule membrane, secretory granule lumen, cytoplasmic vesicle lumen, vesicle lumen, and external side of plasma membrane, and the top 5 MFs were immune receptor activity, amide binding, peptide binding, G protein-coupled peptide receptor activity, and chemokine activity ().
Figure 5

Functional enrichment analysis results of the healing-related DEGs. (A) Bubble diagram of the GO functional enrichment analysis, including the biological process, cell components, and molecular functions; (B) circle diagram of the specifically enriched genes of the biological processes; (C) bubble diagram of the top 10 KEGG pathways; (D) circle diagram of the specifically enriched genes in the top 5 pathways. The size of the bubble represents the number of enriched genes, and the color represents the q value. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Functional enrichment analysis results of the healing-related DEGs. (A) Bubble diagram of the GO functional enrichment analysis, including the biological process, cell components, and molecular functions; (B) circle diagram of the specifically enriched genes of the biological processes; (C) bubble diagram of the top 10 KEGG pathways; (D) circle diagram of the specifically enriched genes in the top 5 pathways. The size of the bubble represents the number of enriched genes, and the color represents the q value. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. The results of the KEGG functional enrichment analysis of the healing-related DEGs revealed that the top 10 enriched KEGG pathways were tuberculosis, osteoclast differentiation, phagosome, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, staphylococcus aureus infection, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, chemokine signaling pathway, leishmaniasis, and hematopoietic cell lineage and pertussis ().

Acquisition and expression analysis of DFU hub immune-related genes

We obtained the hub gene of IL-1B from the intersection genes of ulcer-related DEGs, healing-related DEGs, and immune-related genes (). The analysis showed that IL-1B was more highly expressed in healed DFU patients than non-healed DFU patients (). Additionally, IL-1B was more highly expressed in DF patients with ulcers than DF patients without ulcers (). These results suggest that IL-1B may play an important role in the development and healing of ulcers in DF patients.
Figure 6

Acquisition and expression analysis of DFU hub immune–related genes. (A) Venn diagram of intersection genes of ulcer-related DEGs, healing-related DEGs and immune-related DEGs; (B) IL-1B expression levels in healed and unhealed patients; (C) IL-1B expression levels in patients with and without ulcers. DFU, diabetic foot ulcer; DEGs, differential expressed genes; IL-1B, interleukin-1 beta.

Acquisition and expression analysis of DFU hub immune–related genes. (A) Venn diagram of intersection genes of ulcer-related DEGs, healing-related DEGs and immune-related DEGs; (B) IL-1B expression levels in healed and unhealed patients; (C) IL-1B expression levels in patients with and without ulcers. DFU, diabetic foot ulcer; DEGs, differential expressed genes; IL-1B, interleukin-1 beta.

Immune infiltration levels in DF patients

The immune infiltration analysis showed that activated cluster of differentiation (CD)8 T cells, central memory CD8 T cells, T follicular helper cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, natural killer T cells, and monocytes were more highly infiltrated in healed DFU patients than unhealed DFU patients (). CD56 bright natural killer cells were more highly infiltrated in DF patients with ulcers than DF patients without ulcers ().
Figure 7

Immune infiltration levels in diabetic foot patients. (A) Violin diagram of the relative abundance of 28 immune cells in diabetic patients with and without foot ulcers; (B) violin diagram of the relative abundance of 28 immune cells in DFU patients with and without healed ulcers. DFU, diabetic foot ulcer.

Immune infiltration levels in diabetic foot patients. (A) Violin diagram of the relative abundance of 28 immune cells in diabetic patients with and without foot ulcers; (B) violin diagram of the relative abundance of 28 immune cells in DFU patients with and without healed ulcers. DFU, diabetic foot ulcer.

The correlation between the expression levels of the hub gene of IL-1B and the abundance of immune cells

The correlation analysis showed that the expression levels of IL-1B were positively correlated with the infiltration levels of activated CD4 T cells, activated dendritic cells, CD56 bright natural killer cells, CD56 dim natural killer cells, central memory CD4 T cells, central memory CD8 T cells, gamma delta T cells, monocytes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, natural killer T cells, neutrophils, regulatory T cells, T follicular helper cells, type 1 T helper cells, type 2 T helper cells, and type 17 T helper cells ().
Figure 8

The correlation between the expression levels of the hub gene of IL-1B and the abundance of immune cells. (A) Activated CD4 T cells, (B) activated dendritic cells; (C) CD56 bright natural killer cells; (D) CD56dim natural killer cells; (E) central memory CD4 T cells; (F) central memory CD8 T cells; (G) gamma delta T cells; (H) monocytes; (I) myeloid-derived suppressor cells; (J) natural killer T cells; (K) neutrophils; (L) regulatory T cells; (M) T follicular helper cells; (N) type 1 T helper cells; (O) type 2 T helper cells; and (P) type 17 T helper cells. IL-1B, interleukin 1 beta.

The correlation between the expression levels of the hub gene of IL-1B and the abundance of immune cells. (A) Activated CD4 T cells, (B) activated dendritic cells; (C) CD56 bright natural killer cells; (D) CD56dim natural killer cells; (E) central memory CD4 T cells; (F) central memory CD8 T cells; (G) gamma delta T cells; (H) monocytes; (I) myeloid-derived suppressor cells; (J) natural killer T cells; (K) neutrophils; (L) regulatory T cells; (M) T follicular helper cells; (N) type 1 T helper cells; (O) type 2 T helper cells; and (P) type 17 T helper cells. IL-1B, interleukin 1 beta.

Discussion

Many diabetic patients suffer from end-point complications, such as cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, arty disease, and DF, and these complications often combine. Most DF patients suffer from ulcers in the lower limbs, and other complications can inhibit the ulcer healing process. Several studies have shown that there are various gene expression level alterations in DF and the DFU healing process (10-13). However, further research needs to be conducted to examine the fundamental biological functions of the alteration genes. We conducted the present study to investigate the DEGs between DUF, normal diabetic patients, and healed DFU patients, and examined the hub immune genes expression levels and enrichment functions. If clinicians could diagnose DF early or identify novel therapy targets, the quality of life of these patients would greatly increase, and the economic burden on society would be relieved. Our results showed that there were 238 upregulated genes and 207 downregulated genes in the DF patients with and without ulcers, and there were 74 upregulated genes and 28 downregulated genes in the healed and unhealed samples. To understand the main biological functions of the DEGs, we performed a functional enrichment analysis. The results showed that the main biological functions of the DEGs were neutrophil degranulation, leukocyte chemotaxis, myeloid leukocyte migration, phagosome, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and the chemokine signaling pathway. Neutrophils have been proven to play a critical role in DFU (14-17). Arican et al. showed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio can be a predict the prognosis of DFU, and a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio inhibits the healing process (15). Yang et al. also found that citH3, a neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) specific marker, acts as an inhibitor in wound healing (17). Bannon et al. found that myeloid cells were contributors of chronic inflammation during ulcer healing in mice (18). Pasquier et al. showed that osteoclast cells may have significant correlation with charcot foot disease (19). The chemokine signaling pathway has also been proven to be a significant regulator of DFU (20-22). Thus, a number of gene alterations occur during the DFU and wound healing processes. According to the functional enrichment analysis, these genes act as regulators of leukocytes and inflammation. Ulcers occur with inflammation and immune cells, such as neutrophils, macrophages and T cells. Immune cells can secrete various chemokines to promote or inhibit inflammation. Thus, we explored the correlation between DEGs and significant immune-related genes. The intersection results showed that IL-1B was more highly expressed in DFU and healed DFU patients than patients without ulcers and unhealed DFU patients. IL-1, including IL-1α or IL-1B, is a master cytokine of local and systemic inflammation, and IL-1B is thought to act in the later phase of macrophage recruitment to damaged tissue (23). IL-1 has been shown to play a key role in various diseases, including osteoarthritis, kidney disease, and periodontitis (24-26). These diseases are always accompanied by inflammation. IL-1B and IL-1β are also regulators of the immune response (27). Only a few studies have investigated the relationship between diabetic eye disease, diabetic nephropathy, and DFU (28-30). NETs can promote the inflammation of DFUs that are regulated by IL-1B, and acts as a stimulus for NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation in macrophages to promote IL-1B-dependent exacerbation of inflammation, but degrading NETs improves the wound healing process (29). Thus, IL-1B may affect the DFU healing process by regulating inflammation. Based on the importance of the role of immune cells in the occurrence and progression of DFU, we examined immune cell abundance differences among normal diabetes patients, healed DFU patients, and unhealed DFU patients. We found that activated CD8 T cells, central memory CD8 T cells, T follicular helper cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, natural killer T cells, and monocytes were highly infiltrated in unhealed patients. However, no difference was found between patients with and without ulcers. These results indicate that immune cells may be involved in the healing process of ulcers but not in the occurrence of ulcers. Several studies have already confirmed that immune cells or immune responses play important roles in DFU and wound healing (5,31-33). Dong et al. found that increasing the abundance of mast cells inhibited the healing process of DFU (31). Regrettably, the roles of many immune cells in the healing process of DFU have not yet been closely investigated. We also investigated the correlations between IL-1B expression levels and immune cell infiltration. The results showed that IL-1B was positively correlated with the infiltration levels of activated CD4 T cells, activated dendritic cells, CD56 bright natural killer cells, CD56 dim natural killer cells, central memory CD4 T cells, central memory CD8 T cells, gamma delta T cells, monocytes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, natural killer T cells, neutrophils, regulatory T cells, T follicular helper cells, type 1 T helper cells, type 2 T helper cells, and type 17 T helper cells. The limitation of this study is the lack of verification of the expression and function of hub genes IL-1B.

Conclusions

In the present study, we identified DEGs in DF patients with and without ulcers, and in healed and unhealed patients. We identified a number of gene alterations, and found that the inflammation response was critical in the occurrence and healing process of DFU. The immune-related gene of IL-1B may be a diagnostic tool that can be used to assess the healing process of DFU patients. IL-1B may affect the DFU healing process by regulating inflammation and immune cell infiltration. The article’s supplementary files as
  31 in total

Review 1.  Promising role of ANGPTL4 gene in diabetic wound healing.

Authors:  Awadhesh K Arya; Kamlakar Tripathi; Parimal Das
Journal:  Int J Low Extrem Wounds       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.057

2.  Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Are Markers of Wound Healing Impairment in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated in a Multidisciplinary Setting.

Authors:  Shuofei Yang; Zhichun Gu; Can Lu; Ting Zhang; Xiangjiang Guo; Guanhua Xue; Lan Zhang
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  The role of inflammation in diabetic eye disease.

Authors:  Marina Mesquida; Faye Drawnel; Sascha Fauser
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 4.  Immune aging in diabetes and its implications in wound healing.

Authors:  J Moura; P Madureira; E C Leal; A C Fonseca; E Carvalho
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 5.  TRIM-directed selective autophagy regulates immune activation.

Authors:  Tomonori Kimura; Ashish Jain; Seong Won Choi; Michael A Mandell; Terje Johansen; Vojo Deretic
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 16.016

6.  Predicting diabetic foot ulcer infection using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: a prospective study.

Authors:  Fatma Aybala Altay; Semanur Kuzi; Mustafa Altay; İhsan Ateş; Yunus Gürbüz; Emin Ediz Tütüncü; Gönül Çiçek Şentürk; Nilgün Altın; İrfan Şencan
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  FGF23 and Klotho Levels are Independently Associated with Diabetic Foot Syndrome in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Javier Donate-Correa; Ernesto Martín-Núñez; Carla Ferri; Carolina Hernández-Carballo; Víctor G Tagua; Alejandro Delgado-Molinos; Ángel López-Castillo; Sergio Rodríguez-Ramos; Purificación Cerro-López; Victoria Castro López-Tarruella; Miguel Angel Arévalo-González; Nayra Pérez-Delgado; Carmen Mora-Fernández; Juan F Navarro-González
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  The Reduced Expression of EOLA1 May Be Related to Refractory Diabetic Foot Ulcer.

Authors:  Mingxia Wu; Weiling Leng; Hang Pan; Xiaotian Lei; Liu Chen; Xinshou Ouyang; Ziwen Liang
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 9.  Genetics of diabetes mellitus and diabetes complications.

Authors:  Joanne B Cole; Jose C Florez
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 42.439

Review 10.  Interleukin-1β is a potential therapeutic target for periodontitis: a narrative review.

Authors:  Ran Cheng; Zhiwu Wu; Mingming Li; Meiying Shao; Tao Hu
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 6.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.