Fatma Aybala Altay1, Semanur Kuzi2, Mustafa Altay3, İhsan Ateş4, Yunus Gürbüz1, Emin Ediz Tütüncü1, Gönül Çiçek Şentürk1, Nilgün Altın1, İrfan Şencan1. 1. 1 Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. 2. 2 Infectious Diseases Department, Artvin State Hospital, Artvin, Turkey. 3. 3 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Health Sciences, Keçiören SUAM, Ankara, Turkey. 4. 4 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Numune SUAM, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be used in the early stage risk assessment and follow-up in diabetic foot infection. METHODS: Over a five-year study, NLR values on admission and day 14 of treatment were matched with their laboratory and clinical data in a cohort study. Patients were followed-up or consulted in several clinics or polyclinics (infectious diseases). RESULTS: Admission time NLR was higher, in severe cases as indicated by both Wagner and PEDIS infection scores (severe versus mild Wagner score NLR 6.7 versus 4.2; p=0.04; for PEDIS score NLR 6.3 versus 3.6; p=0.03, respectively). In patients who underwent vascular intervention (12.6 versus 4.6; p=0.02); amputation indicated (9.2 versus 4.1; p=0.005) and healed afterwards (6.9 versus 4.3; p<0,001), when matched with others. NLR was also found to be correlated with duration of both IV antibiotic treatment (r=0.374; p=0.005) and hospitalisation (r=0.337; p=0.02). Day 14 NLR was higher in patients who underwent vascular intervention (5.1 versus 2.9; p=0.007) when matched to others. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher NLR values at admission had more severe diabetic foot infection, higher risk for amputation, need for long-term hospitalisation and aggressive treatment. However, they also have more chance of benefit from treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may be used in the early stage risk assessment and follow-up in diabetic foot infection. METHODS: Over a five-year study, NLR values on admission and day 14 of treatment were matched with their laboratory and clinical data in a cohort study. Patients were followed-up or consulted in several clinics or polyclinics (infectious diseases). RESULTS: Admission time NLR was higher, in severe cases as indicated by both Wagner and PEDIS infection scores (severe versus mild Wagner score NLR 6.7 versus 4.2; p=0.04; for PEDIS score NLR 6.3 versus 3.6; p=0.03, respectively). In patients who underwent vascular intervention (12.6 versus 4.6; p=0.02); amputation indicated (9.2 versus 4.1; p=0.005) and healed afterwards (6.9 versus 4.3; p<0,001), when matched with others. NLR was also found to be correlated with duration of both IV antibiotic treatment (r=0.374; p=0.005) and hospitalisation (r=0.337; p=0.02). Day 14 NLR was higher in patients who underwent vascular intervention (5.1 versus 2.9; p=0.007) when matched to others. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher NLR values at admission had more severe diabetic foot infection, higher risk for amputation, need for long-term hospitalisation and aggressive treatment. However, they also have more chance of benefit from treatment.
Entities:
Keywords:
amputation; diabetic foot infection; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; primary care