Literature DB >> 35279806

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and outcomes with different autografts in a population with kneeling customs.

S Supreeth1, S A Ghanami2, M A Riyami2, S A Habsi2, P S Murthi3, W A Kalbani2, H A Saqri2, S N Haddad2, S R Abdelmasih2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate, compare the mid-term functional outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using different autografts and assess the cause of failure of primary ACLR in an Omani population with kneeling customs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with failed primary ACLR who underwent revision ACLR using autografts were included in this retrospective study. The cause of primary ACLR failure and the functional outcome was assessed using the Tegner-Lyholm knee score and compared among bone patella tendon-bone (BPTB), quadriceps tendon (QT), semitendinosus gracilis (STG) autografts used.
RESULTS: One hundred two patients (102 male) were included in the study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Thirty-one patients underwent revision with BPTB, 34 with STG and 19 with QT autografts. Majority of the patients (70.23%) achieved good-to-excellent functional outcome based on their Tegner-Lysholm scores. The functional outcome of different autografts was comparable to each other based on Kruskal-Wallis test. The causes of primary ACLR failure were failure due to trauma in 58.33% of patients, technical failure in 22.61% of patients, and nontraumatic failure in 19.04% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The functional outcome of revision ACLR in this Middle Eastern Asian Omani population was good-to-excellent, with the patients experiencing no difficulty in performing activities of daily living, including kneeling activities. The outcome of different autografts, BTPB, QT, STSG is similar in high knee flexion patients with no autograft found to be superior. The findings of this study add to the literature on functional outcomes after primary and revision ACLR in a customary kneeling population.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; Autografts; High flexion; Kneeling; Oman; Outcomes; Revision

Year:  2022        PMID: 35279806     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-022-00739-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  15 in total

Review 1.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ganesh V Kamath; John C Redfern; Patrick E Greis; Robert T Burks
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Bent Lund; Torsten Nielsen; Peter Faunø; Svend Erik Christiansen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Results from the Swedish national anterior cruciate ligament register.

Authors:  Joanna Kvist; Jüri Kartus; Jon Karlsson; Magnus Forssblad
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Varieties of human posture.

Authors:  J H Prost
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 0.553

6.  Double-bundle revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is effective in rescuing failed primary reconstruction and re-introducing patients to physical exercise.

Authors:  Changqing Jiang; Guofei Chen; Peng Chen; Wei Li; Honglei Zhang; Wentao Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Calcium phosphate cement enhances primary stability of open-wedge high-tibial osteotomies.

Authors:  Thomas Lind-Hansen; Poul Torben Nielsen; Juozas Petruskevicius; Benny Endelt; Karl Brian Nielsen; Ivan Hvid; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The rate of subsequent surgery and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: two- and 6-year follow-up results from a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Carolyn M Hettrich; Warren R Dunn; Emily K Reinke; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Female Sex Is a Risk Factor for Failure of Hip Arthroscopy Performed for Acetabular Retroversion.

Authors:  Kirsten L Poehling-Monaghan; Aaron J Krych; Bruce A Levy; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-11-15

10.  Factors that affect patient reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-a systematic review of the Scandinavian knee ligament registers.

Authors:  Eric Hamrin Senorski; Eleonor Svantesson; Angelo Baldari; Olufemi R Ayeni; Lars Engebretsen; Francesco Franceschi; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.