Literature DB >> 30030283

Factors that affect patient reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-a systematic review of the Scandinavian knee ligament registers.

Eric Hamrin Senorski1, Eleonor Svantesson2, Angelo Baldari3, Olufemi R Ayeni4, Lars Engebretsen5,6, Francesco Franceschi3, Jón Karlsson2,7, Kristian Samuelsson2,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of findings from the Scandinavian knee ligament registers with regard to factors that affect patient reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Four electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and AMED were searched, and 157 studies were identified. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts and full text articles for eligibility. A modified version of the Downs and Black checklist was applied for quality appraisal. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Studies published from the Scandinavian registers from their establishment in 2004 and onwards that documented patient reported outcome and provided information on concomitant injuries were eligible.
RESULTS: A total of 35 studies were included. Younger age at ACL reconstruction, male sex, not smoking and receiving a hamstring tendon autograft positively influenced patient reported outcome. Patients with concomitant cartilage and meniscal injuries reported inferior subjective knee function compared with patients with an isolated ACL tear. One study reported that patients treated non-reconstructively reported inferior knee function compared with patients who had ACL reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: Younger age, male sex, not smoking, receiving a hamstring tendon autograft and the absence of concomitant injuries were associated with superior patient reported outcomes after ACL reconstruction. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acl; anterior cruciate ligament; knee acl; review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30030283     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  16 in total

1.  Should "garbage in-garbage out" be replaced by "little in-little out"? Questionnaire response rates need to be improved in surgical quality registries!

Authors:  Alexander Sandon; Magnus Forssblad; Martin Hägglund; Markus Waldén
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction Based on Graft Type: Are all Grafts Equivalent?

Authors:  Matthew Widner; Mark Dunleavy; Scott Lynch
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Etiology of Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dan Cohen; Patrick Fangping Yao; Abhilash Uddandam; Darren de Sa; Michelle E Arakgi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-07-19

4.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and outcomes with different autografts in a population with kneeling customs.

Authors:  S Supreeth; S A Ghanami; M A Riyami; S A Habsi; P S Murthi; W A Kalbani; H A Saqri; S N Haddad; S R Abdelmasih
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2022-03-12

5.  Strength in numbers? The fragility index of studies from the Scandinavian knee ligament registries.

Authors:  Eleonor Svantesson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Adam Danielsson; David Sundemo; Olof Westin; Olufemi R Ayeni; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Self-Reported Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety After ACL Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ramana Piussi; Tora Berghdal; David Sundemo; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Mikael Sansone; Kristian Samuelsson; Eric Hamrin Senorski
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-18

7.  Prediction of improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mikołaj Wypych; Robert Lundqvist; Dariusz Witoński; Rafał Kęska; Anna Szmigielska; Przemysław T Paradowski
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-05-29

8.  Low annual hospital volume of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not associated with higher revision rates.

Authors:  R Kyle Martin; Andreas Persson; Gilbert Moatshe; Anne Marie Fenstad; Lars Engebretsen; Jon Olav Drogset; Håvard Visnes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.114

9.  Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group.

Authors:  Eleonor Svantesson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Kate E Webster; Jón Karlsson; Theresa Diermeier; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Sean J Meredith; Thomas Rauer; James J Irrgang; Kurt P Spindler; C Benjamin Ma; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Middlebrook; Sheree Bekker; Nicola Middlebrook; Alison B Rushton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.