Literature DB >> 35279704

Integrative metabolomic characterization identifies plasma metabolomic signature in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid cancer.

Shuang Yu1, Changan Liu2, Yingtong Hou1, Jie Li3, Zhuming Guo4, Xinwen Chen1, Luyao Zhang1, Sui Peng5,6, Shubin Hong1, Lixia Xu6,7, Xiaoxing Li6, Rengyun Liu6, Shuwei Chen4, Bin Li5, Zongpeng Weng5, Yanbing Li1, Weiming Lv8, Jun Yu9,10, Haipeng Xiao11.   

Abstract

Discrimination of malignancy from thyroid nodules poses challenges in clinical practice. We aimed to identify the plasma metabolomic biomarkers in discriminating papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) from benign thyroid nodule (BTN). Metabolomics profiling of plasma was performed in two independent cohorts of 651 subjects of PTC (n = 215), BTN (n = 230), and healthy controls (n = 206). In addition, 132 patients with thyroid micronodules (<1 cm) and 44 patients with BTN suspected malignancy by ultrasound were used for biomarker validation. Recursive feature elimination algorithm was used for metabolic biomarkers selecting. Significant differential metabolites were demonstrated in patients with thyroid nodules (PTC and BTN) from healthy controls (P = 0.0001). A metabolic biomarker panel (17 differential metabolites) was identified to discriminate PTC from BTN with an AUC of 97.03% (95% CI: 95.28-98.79%), 91.89% sensitivity, and 92.63% specificity in discovery cohort. The panel had an AUC of 92.72% (95% CI: 87.46-97.99%), 86.57% sensitivity, and 92.50% specificity in validation cohort. The metabolic biomarker signature could correctly identify 84.09% patients whose nodules were suspected malignant by ultrasonography but finally histological benign. Moreover, high accuracy of 87.88% for diagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma was displayed by this panel and showed significant improvement in accuracy, AUC and specificity when compared with ultrasound. We identified a novel metabolic biomarker signature to discriminate PTC from BTN. The clinical use of this biomarker panel would have improved diagnosis stratification of thyroid microcarcinoma in comparison to ultrasound.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35279704     DOI: 10.1038/s41388-022-02254-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  45 in total

Review 1.  CLINICAL PRACTICE. Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Kenneth D Burman; Leonard Wartofsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A prospective assessment defining the limitations of thyroid nodule pathologic evaluation.

Authors:  Edmund S Cibas; Zubair W Baloch; Giovanni Fellegara; Virginia A LiVolsi; Stephen S Raab; Juan Rosai; James Diggans; Lyssa Friedman; Giulia C Kennedy; Richard T Kloos; Richard B Lanman; Susan J Mandel; Nicole Sindy; David L Steward; Martha A Zeiger; Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee.

Authors:  Franklin N Tessler; William D Middleton; Edward G Grant; Jenny K Hoang; Lincoln L Berland; Sharlene A Teefey; John J Cronan; Michael D Beland; Terry S Desser; Mary C Frates; Lynwood W Hammers; Ulrike M Hamper; Jill E Langer; Carl C Reading; Leslie M Scoutt; A Thomas Stavros
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Maria E Cabanillas; David G McFadden; Cosimo Durante
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  The changing incidence of thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 6.  2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.568

7.  Thyroid Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Results: Observed Increase in Indeterminate Rate over the Past Decade.

Authors:  Amy M Manning; Huaitao Yang; Mercedes Falciglia; Jonathan R Mark; David L Steward
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Cancer statistics in China, 2015.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen; Rongshou Zheng; Peter D Baade; Siwei Zhang; Hongmei Zeng; Freddie Bray; Ahmedin Jemal; Xue Qin Yu; Jie He
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 9.  The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan P Brito; Michael R Gionfriddo; Alaa Al Nofal; Kasey R Boehmer; Aaron L Leppin; Carl Reading; Matthew Callstrom; Tarig A Elraiyah; Larry J Prokop; Marius N Stan; M Hassan Murad; John C Morris; Victor M Montori
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Five Different Ultrasound TI-RADS Classification Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Ruoning Yang; Xiuhe Zou; Hao Zeng; Yunuo Zhao; Xuelei Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.