CONTEXT: Significant uncertainty remains surrounding the diagnostic accuracy of sonographic features used to predict the malignant potential of thyroid nodules. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to summarize the available literature related to the accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound (US) in the prediction of thyroid cancer. METHODS: We searched multiple databases and reference lists for cohort studies that enrolled adults with thyroid nodules with reported diagnostic measures of sonography. A total of 14 relevant US features were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 31 studies between 1985 and 2012 (number of nodules studied 18,288; average size 15 mm). The frequency of thyroid cancer was 20%. The most common type of cancer was papillary thyroid cancer (84%). The US nodule features with the highest diagnostic odds ratio for malignancy was being taller than wider [11.14 (95% confidence interval 6.6-18.9)]. Conversely, the US nodule features with the highest diagnostic odds ratio for benign nodules was spongiform appearance [12 (95% confidence interval 0.61-234.3)]. Heterogeneity across studies was substantial. Estimates of accuracy depended on the experience of the physician interpreting the US, the type of cancer and nodule (indeterminate), and type of reference standard. In a threshold model, spongiform appearance and cystic nodules were the only two features that, if present, could have avoided the use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests that individual ultrasound features are not accurate predictors of thyroid cancer. Two features, cystic content and spongiform appearance, however, might predict benign nodules, but this has limited applicability to clinical practice due to their infrequent occurrence.
CONTEXT: Significant uncertainty remains surrounding the diagnostic accuracy of sonographic features used to predict the malignant potential of thyroid nodules. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to summarize the available literature related to the accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound (US) in the prediction of thyroid cancer. METHODS: We searched multiple databases and reference lists for cohort studies that enrolled adults with thyroid nodules with reported diagnostic measures of sonography. A total of 14 relevant US features were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 31 studies between 1985 and 2012 (number of nodules studied 18,288; average size 15 mm). The frequency of thyroid cancer was 20%. The most common type of cancer was papillary thyroid cancer (84%). The US nodule features with the highest diagnostic odds ratio for malignancy was being taller than wider [11.14 (95% confidence interval 6.6-18.9)]. Conversely, the US nodule features with the highest diagnostic odds ratio for benign nodules was spongiform appearance [12 (95% confidence interval 0.61-234.3)]. Heterogeneity across studies was substantial. Estimates of accuracy depended on the experience of the physician interpreting the US, the type of cancer and nodule (indeterminate), and type of reference standard. In a threshold model, spongiform appearance and cystic nodules were the only two features that, if present, could have avoided the use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggests that individual ultrasound features are not accurate predictors of thyroid cancer. Two features, cystic content and spongiform appearance, however, might predict benign nodules, but this has limited applicability to clinical practice due to their infrequent occurrence.
Authors: Jin Chung; Ji Hyun Youk; Jeong-Ah Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Eun-kyung Kim; Young Hoon Ryu; Eun Ju Son Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Rebecca J Mullan; David N Flynn; Bo Carlberg; Imad M Tleyjeh; Celia C Kamath; Matthew L LaBella; Patricia J Erwin; Gordon H Guyatt; Victor M Montori Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2008-11-14 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Asher A Mendelson; Michael Tamilia; Juan Rivera; Michael P Hier; Mark Sherman; Natasha Garfield; Martin J Black; Louise Rochon; Olguta Gologan; Richard J Payne Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2009-06
Authors: Jakob W Kist; Sjoerd Nell; Bart de Keizer; Gerlof D Valk; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Menno R Vriens Journal: Endocrine Date: 2015-06-10 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Xiaoyun Liu; Lijun Zhu; Zhixiao Wang; Dai Cui; Huanhuan Chen; Ling Wei; Yunsong Wu; Rong Rong; Yan Wu; Qing Yao; Zhihong Zhang; Edmund S Cibas; Erik K Alexander; Tao Yang Journal: Mol Clin Oncol Date: 2015-01-22
Authors: Pablo Valderrabano; Melissa J McGettigan; Cesar A Lam; Laila Khazai; Zachary J Thompson; Christine H Chung; Barbara A Centeno; Bryan McIver Journal: Thyroid Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Pengfei Song; Duane D Meixner; Robert T Fazzio; Shigao Chen; James F Greenleaf; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: E Gallardo; J Medina; J C Sánchez; A Viúdez; E Grande; I Porras; T Ramón Y Cajal; J Trigo; L Iglesias; J Capdevila Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Juan P Brito; Naykky Singh-Ospina; Michael R Gionfriddo; Spyridoula Maraka; Ana Espinosa De Ycaza; Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez; John C Morris; Victor M Montori; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Endocrine Date: 2015-08-09 Impact factor: 3.633