| Literature DB >> 35277076 |
Rosario Mare1, Samantha Maurotti2, Yvelise Ferro3, Angelo Galluccio1, Franco Arturi3, Stefano Romeo3,4, Antonio Procopio2, Vincenzo Musolino5, Vincenzo Mollace6, Tiziana Montalcini1,7, Arturo Pujia3,7.
Abstract
Identifying and quantifying the beneficial molecules contained in nutraceuticals is essential to predict the effects derived from their consumption. This study explores a cheap and rapid method for quantifying lycopene content from a semi-solid matrix. In addition, it compares the in vitro effects of the extracts obtained from different tomato sauces available on the local market with Osteocol®, a patented tomato sauce from southern Italy. We performed a liquid extraction of lycopene using suitable solvents. The lycopene extracted was encapsulated in surfactant micelles and finally tested in vitro on Saos-2 cells. The effects exerted by lycopene on ALP and Wnt/β-catenin pathways were investigated by Western blotting. Hexane was found to be the best solvent for lycopene extraction. Spectrophotometrical and HPLC analyses showed similar trends. Osteocol® contained 39 ± 4 mg lycopene per 100 g of sauce, while the best commercial product contained 19 ± 1 mg/100 g. The Osteocol® lycopene extract increased ALP and β-catenin protein expressions in a dose-dependent manner, also showing statistically significant results (p < 0.05 respectively). In conclusion, despite both techniques showing similar final results, UV/VIS spectrophotometer is preferable to HPLC due to its cheap, rapid, and accurate results, as well as for the opportunity to analyze lycopene-loaded micelles. The extraction and release of lycopene to bone cells positively influences the differentiation of osteoblasts and increases the expression of the ALP and β-catenin proteins. As a consequence, as a lycopene-rich sauce, Osteocol® represents a useful supplement in the prevention of osteoporosis compared to its commercial competitors.Entities:
Keywords: carotenoid; lycopene; osteoblast; osteoporosis; tomato sauce
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35277076 PMCID: PMC8838682 DOI: 10.3390/nu14030717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Comparison between UV/VIS spectrophotometer and HPLC analyses.
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DCM | 9.31 × 10−4 | 1.65 | 1.11 × 10−5 | 5.97 × 10−6 | 1.20 |
| 2-Me-THF | 1.86 × 10−4 | 1.45 | 9.79 × 10−6 | 5.26 × 10−6 | 5.25 |
| He | 4.66 × 10−5 | 1.19 | 8.08 × 10−6 | 4.34 × 10−6 | 17.35 |
| He/Ac | 1.86 × 10−4 | 1.70 | 1.15 × 10−6 | 6.15 × 10−6 | 6.15 |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DCM | 2 | 38 | 0.016 | 3.12 × 10−5 | 0.78 |
| 2-Me-THF | 2 | 38.1 | 0.083 | 1.65 × 10−4 | 4.16 |
| He | 2 | 37.7 | 0.325 | 6.5 × 10−4 | 16.26 |
| He/Ac | 2 | 36 | 0.138 | 2.76 × 10−4 | 6.89 |
DCM: Dichloromethane; 2-Me-THF: 2-methyl-tetrahydrofuran; He: n-Hexane; He/Ac: 1:1 n-hexane and acetone mixture; mg/mL: milligrams per milliliters; M = molarity; λ = wavelength; g = grams; %w/w = weight to weight percentage.
Figure 1Influence of solvent ratio and incubation time in lycopene extraction. All data are the mean of three different experiments ± standard deviation.
HPLC analyses of the all-trans lycopene contained in sauces.
| Sample | Extract Injected (mg/mL) | All-Trans Lycopene (mg/mL) | All-Trans Lycopene (% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Osteocol® | 2 | 0.325 | 16.26 |
| Sauce #1 | 2 | 0.329 | 16.44 |
| Sauce #2 | 2 | 0.318 | 15.89 |
| Sauce #3 | 2 | 0.295 | 14.75 |
| Sauce #4 | 2 | 0.254 | 12.7 |
| Sauce #5 | 2 | 0.246 | 12.32 |
mg/mL: milligram per milliliters; % w/w = weight to weight percentage.
Figure 2Lycopene content (mg/100 g sauce) in Osteocol and Sauce#1 ((A)—left) and data adjusted ((A)—right) as a function of the water content in each sauce (B). All data are the means of three different experiments ± standard deviation (Student’s t-test **** p < 0.001).
Figure 3Spectrophotometric scansions between 300 and 650 nm in wavelength. Lycopene standard characteristic peaks were ~472 nm and ~502 nm. Lycopene-based nanoparticles all had a new characteristic peak at ~350 nm, not obtained with empty micelles.
Figure 4(A) Influence exerted by lycopene loaded micelles on β-catenin pathways protein levels; (B) influence exerted by lycopene loaded micelles on ALP protein expression. Cell proteins were analyzed by Western blotting with specific antibodies for each pathway. All data are the means of three different experiments ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis: Student’s t-test vs. 0 * p < 0.05; linear regression # p < 0.05.