Literature DB >> 35276320

Remote and wearable ECG devices with diagnostic abilities in adults: A state-of-the-science scoping review.

Zeineb Bouzid1, Salah S Al-Zaiti2, Raymond Bond3, Ervin Sejdić4.   

Abstract

The electrocardiogram (ECG) records the electrical activity in the heart in real time, providing an important opportunity to detecting various cardiac pathologies. The 12-lead ECG currently serves as the "standard" ECG acquisition technique for diagnostic purposes for many cardiac pathologies other than arrhythmias. However, the technical aspects of acquiring a 12-lead ECG are not easy. and its usage currently is restricted to trained medical personnel, which limits the scope of its usefulness. Remote and wearable ECG devices have attempted to bridge this gap by enabling patients to take their own ECG using a simplified method at the expense of a reduced number of leads, usually a single-lead ECG. In this review, we summarize the studies that investigated the use of remote ECG devices and their clinical utility in diagnosing cardiac pathologies. Eligible studies discussed Food and Drug Administration-cleared, commercially available devices that were validated in an adult population. We summarize technical logistics of signal quality and device reliability, dimensional and functional features, and diagnostic value. Our synthesis shows that reduced-set ECG wearables have huge potential for long-term monitoring, particularly if paired with real-time notification techniques. Such capabilities make them primarily useful for abnormal rhythm detection, and there is sufficient evidence that a remote ECG device can be superior to the traditional 12-lead ECG in diagnosing specific arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation. However, this review identifies important challenges faced by this technology and highlights the limited availability of clinical research examining their usefulness.
Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Device; Diagnosis; Electrocardiogram; Remote; Wearable

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35276320      PMCID: PMC9250606          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.779


  54 in total

1.  Comparison of diagnostic value using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours.

Authors:  Warren M Smith; Fiona Riddell; Morag Madon; Marye J Gleva
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Smartphone electrocardiogram for detecting atrial fibrillation after a cerebral ischaemic event: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Keng Tat Koh; Wan Chung Law; Win Moe Zaw; Diana Hui Ping Foo; Chen Ting Tan; Anderson Steven; Desmond Samuel; Tem Lom Fam; Ching Hua Chai; Zhai Sing Wong; Sivaraj Xaviar; Chandan Deepak Bhavnani; Jason Seng Hong Tan; Yen Yee Oon; Asri Said; Alan Yean Yip Fong; Tiong Kiam Ong
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Electrocardiographic distortions caused by inadequate high-frequency response of direct-writing electrocardiographs.

Authors:  A S Berson; H V Pipberger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Accuracy of Apple Watch for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Dhruv R Seshadri; Barbara Bittel; Dalton Browsky; Penny Houghtaling; Colin K Drummond; Milind Y Desai; A Marc Gillinov
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  2021 ISHNE/ HRS/ EHRA/ APHRS collaborative statement on mHealth in Arrhythmia Management: Digital Medical Tools for Heart Rhythm Professionals: From the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology/Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Mintu Turakhia; Hein Heidbuchel; Yufeng Hu; Lin Yee Chen; Jean-Philippe Couderc; Edmond M Cronin; Jerry D Estep; Lars Grieten; Deirdre A Lane; Reena Mehra; Alex Page; Rod Passman; Jonathan Piccini; Ewa Piotrowicz; Ryszard Piotrowicz; Pyotr G Platonov; Antonio Luiz Ribeiro; Robert E Rich; Andrea M Russo; David Slotwiner; Jonathan S Steinberg; Emma Svennberg
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Novel Use of Apple Watch 4 to Obtain 3-Lead Electrocardiogram and Detect Cardiac Ischemia.

Authors:  Cesar O Avila
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-06-27

7.  Diagnostic Accuracy of a Smartphone-Operated, Single-Lead Electrocardiography Device for Detection of Rhythm and Conduction Abnormalities in Primary Care.

Authors:  Jelle C L Himmelreich; Evert P M Karregat; Wim A M Lucassen; Henk C P M van Weert; Joris R de Groot; M Louis Handoko; Robin Nijveldt; Ralf E Harskamp
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Accuracy of a single-lead mobile smartphone electrocardiogram for QT interval measurement in patients undergoing maintenance methadone therapy.

Authors:  Erika N Titus-Lay; Heather A Jaynes; Elena Tomaselli Muensterman; Carol A Ott; Todd A Walroth; Gabriela Williams; Paul R Moe; Michelle Wilbrandt; James E Tisdale
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 4.705

Review 9.  Usefulness, pitfalls and interpretation of handheld single‑lead electrocardiograms.

Authors:  M Patrick Witvliet; Evert P M Karregat; Jelle C L Himmelreich; Jonas S S G de Jong; Wim A M Lucassen; Ralf E Harskamp
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 1.438

10.  Smartphone ECG Monitoring System Helps Lower Emergency Room and Clinic Visits in Post-Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Patients.

Authors:  Mossab Aljuaid; Qussay Marashly; Jad AlDanaf; Ibrahim Tawhari; Michel Barakat; Rody Barakat; Brittany Zobell; William Cho; Mihail G Chelu; Nassir F Marrouche
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-20
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring Using Wearables for Clinical Guidance before and after Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Henrike Aenne Katrin Hillmann; Samira Soltani; Johanna Mueller-Leisse; Stephan Hohmann; David Duncker
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  A universal, high-performance ECG signal processing engine to reduce clinical burden.

Authors:  Austin Gibbs; Matthew Fitzpatrick; Mark Lilburn; Holly Easlea; Jonathan Francey; Rebecca Funston; Jordan Diven; Stacey Murray; Oliver G J Mitchell; Adrian Condon; Andrew R J Mitchell; Benjamin Sanchez; David Steinhaus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.485

3.  ECG performance in simultaneous recordings of five wearable devices using a new morphological noise-to-signal index and Smith-Waterman-based RR interval comparisons.

Authors:  Dominic Bläsing; Anja Buder; Julian Elias Reiser; Maria Nisser; Steffen Derlien; Marcus Vollmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.