| Literature DB >> 35274485 |
Qing Ye1,2,3,4,5, Huahong Zhu1,2,3,4,5, Huiping Chen1,2,3,4, Renyuan Liu6, Lili Huang1,2,3,4, Haifeng Chen1,2,3,4, Yue Cheng1,2,3,4, Ruomeng Qin1,2,3,4, Pengfei Shao1,2,3,4, Hengheng Xu1,2,3,4, Junyi Ma1,2,3,4, Yun Xu1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
AIMS: This study aimed to analyze the potential association between cognition reserve (CR) components, including education, working activity, and leisure time activity, and cognitive function in subjects with white matter hyperintensities (WMH). The study also explored the role of the frontoparietal control network (FPCN) in such association.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive reserve; education; leisure time activity; white matter hyperintensities; working activity
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35274485 PMCID: PMC9062549 DOI: 10.1111/cns.13824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther ISSN: 1755-5930 Impact factor: 7.035
Demographic, neuropsychological, and CR data
| Items | HC ( | WMH without CI ( | WMH with CI ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y (SD) | 60.78 ± 7.36 | 64.78 ± 7.93a | 65.52 ± 7.97a | 9.853 |
|
| Gender (male/female) | 46/49 | 28/32 | 42/35 | 0.998 | 0.732 |
| Education, y (SD) | 11.65 ± 4.75 | 11.37 ± 4.43 | 11.23 ± 3.20 | 0.238 | 0.788 |
| Brain volume, ml (SD) | 1328.6 ± 122.36 | 1340.74 ± 101.18 | 1356.38 ± 130.00 | 1.193 | 0.305 |
| WMH volume, ml (IQR) | 1.01 (0.50–2.02) | 3.21 (1.49–6.67)a | 6.10 (3.21–11.82)a,b | ‐ |
|
| Grey matter atrophy, % (SD) | 41.36 ± 1.85 | 41.04 ± 1.94 | 40.90 ± 1.84 | 1.442 | 0.239 |
| MMSE (IQR) | 29 (28–30) | 29 (28–30) | 28 (27–29)a,b | ‐ |
|
| MoCA (IQR) | 25 (22–27) | 26 (25–27) | 22 (19–23)a,b | ‐ |
|
| Memory (SD) | 0.1544 ± 0.8878 | 0.1244 ± 0.6596 | −0.2215 ± 0.8081a,b | 5.111 |
|
| Executive function (IQR) | 0.2088 (−0.4512–0.7686) | 0.0245 (−0.4831–0.5499) | −0.4713 (−0.8936–0.0895)a,b | ‐ |
|
| Visual‐spatial ability (IQR) | 0.2841 (−0.4721–0.7883) | 0.2841 (−0.4721–0.5362) | −0.2200 (−0.7242–0.2841)a,b | ‐ |
|
| Processing speed (SD) | 0.1929 ± 0.8896 | 0.1615 ± 0.8208 | −0.3415 ± 0.6627a,b | 11.65 |
|
| CRI (IQR) | 96.00 (88.50–115.00) | 95.00 (87.00–110.00) | 94.00 (86.00–106.00) | ‐ | 0.695 |
| CRI‐education (IQR) | 102.00 (93.00–112.00) | 103.00 (90.00–115.50) | 101.00 (94.00–112.00) | ‐ | 0.928 |
| CRI‐working activity (IQR) | 102.00 (91.00–114.00) | 104.00 (92.00–117.00) | 100.00 (90.00–117.02) | ‐ | 0.866 |
| CRI‐leisure time activity (IQR) | 87.00 (79.50–93.00) | 89.00 (77.00–97.50) | 84.00 (77.00–90.00)a,b | ‐ |
|
Values are presented as mean ± stand deviation (SD) or median (IQR, interquartile range). Grey matter atrophy is a calculation of grey matter volumes divided by the brain volume; lower values indicate more grey matter atrophy. One‐way ANOVA was applied in the analyses of age, education, brain volume, brain atrophy rate, memory, and processing speed. χ2 test was applied in the analysis of gender. The Kruskal–Wallis test was applied in the analyses of WMH volume, MMSE, MoCA, executive function, visual‐spatial ability, and cognitive reserve data. Significance is highlighted in bold (p < 0.05). a p < 0.05, differs from the control group. b p < 0.05, differs from the WMH without CI group.
Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; CI, cognitive impairment; CRI, Cognitive Reserve Index; HC, healthy control; IQR, interquartile range; MMSE, mini mental state examination; MoCA, montreal cognitive assessment; SD, stand deviation; WMH, white matter hyperintensities.
Associations between CR and global cognitive function according to diagnosis
| CR | CRI | CRI‐education | CRI‐working activity | CRI‐leisure time activity | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognition | HC | WMH without CI | WMH with CI | HC | WMH without CI | WMH with CI | HC | WMH without CI | WMH with CI | HC | WMH without CI | WMH with CI |
| MMSE | 0.094a | 0.357a | NS | 0.083a | 0.046a | NS | 0.035 | 0.02 | NS | 0.073 | NS | NS |
| MoCA | 0.179a | 0.429a | 0.381a | 0.191a | 0.083a | 0.13a | 0.106a | 0.044 | NS | 0.136a | 0.065 | NS |
Values depicted are unstandardized coefficients (β) from linear regression models with cognitive function as the dependent variable and CR as the independent variable, adjusted for age, sex, brain volume, WMH volume, and grey matter atrophy rate. p < 0.05 for all shown β values. a p < 0.002 (0.05/24 tests) corrected with the Bonferroni principle.
Abbreviations: CI, cognitive impairment; CR, cognitive reserve; CRI, cognitive reserve index; HC, healthy control; MMSE, mini mental state examination; MoCA, montreal cognitive assessment; NS, not significant; WMH, white matter hyperintensities.
FIGURE 1The associations of CRI‐working activity and CRI‐leisure time activity with the right FPCN in the WMH groups. (A–B) The CRI‐working activity was significantly associated with FPCN FC in the frontal, parietal, and cingulate regions in the WMH without CI group not in the WMH with CI group. (C–D) The CRI‐leisure time activity was significantly associated with FPCN FC in the frontal, parietal, and cingulate regions in the WMH without CI group not in the WMH with CI group. Correlative analyses were performed between the FPCN and each CRI aspect while controlling for age, sex, and grey matter images. The thresholds were set at a corrected p < 0.05, determined by Monte Carlo simulation for multiple comparisons (voxelwise p < 0.05, cluster size >2646 mm3). The color bars present correlation coefficients. CI, cognitive impairment; CRI, cognitive reserve index; FC, functional connectivity; FPCN, frontoparietal control network; WMH, white matter hyperintensities
FIGURE 2The associations of CRI‐education with the right FPCN in the WMH groups. (A–B) CRI‐education was significantly associated with FPCN FC in the left DLPFC in WMH subjects with or without CI. Correlative analyses were performed between the FPCN and each CRI aspect while controlling for age, sex, and grey matter images. The thresholds were set at a corrected p < 0.05, determined by Monte Carlo simulation for multiple comparisons (voxelwise p < 0.05, cluster size >2646 mm3). The color bars present with correlation coefficient. (C) FPCN FC in the left DLPFC was positively associated with CRI‐education in the WMH group without CI. (D) The FPCN FC in the left DLPFC was negatively associated with CRI‐education in the WMH group with CI. The FC values were transformed to Z scores using Fisher's Z‐transformation. CI, cognitive impairment; CRI, cognitive reserve index; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; FC, functional connectivity; FPCN, frontoparietal control network; WMH, white matter hyperintensities
FIGURE 3The mediating effect of the left DLPFC on the association between CRI‐education and cognitive function. (A) In the WMH group without CI, FC in the left DLPFC significantly mediated the association of CRI‐education with the visual‐spatial ability (indirect effect: 0.039; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.062). (B) In the WMH group with CI, FC significantly mediated the association of CRI‐education with executive function (indirect effect: −0.004; 95% CI: 0.001, 0.027). The associations of FC with CRI‐education and cognitive function were opposite between the two WMH groups. a, b, and c present regression coefficients. CI, cognitive impairment; CRI, cognitive reserve index; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; FC, functional connectivity; FPCN, frontoparietal control network; WMH, white matter hyperintensities