| Literature DB >> 35270773 |
Katarzyna Kujawa1,2, Alina Żurek3, Agata Gorączko1,2, Roman Olejniczak2, Grzegorz Zurek1.
Abstract
The quality of life of patients with severe brain damage is compromised by, e.g., impaired cognitive functions and ocular dysfunction. The paper contains research findings regarding participants of an oculomotor training course aimed at the therapy of visual-spatial functions. Five male patients with brain damage who did not communicate, verbally or motorically, participated in the study. Over a six-week period, the subjects solved tasks associated with recognising objects, size perception, colour perception, perception of object structures (letters), perception of object structures (objects), detecting differences between images and assembling image components into the complete image with the use of an eye tracker. The findings present evidence of oculomotor training effectiveness based on a longer duration of the work with the eye tracker and improved visual-spatial functions.Entities:
Keywords: brain damage; eye tracking; impaired consciousness; oculomotor training; visual–spatial functions
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270773 PMCID: PMC8910167 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19053081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flow chart. The process of study subject recruitment.
Study group characteristics.
| TBI | ABI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 |
| Diagnosis | CT | CT | CT | CT | HRSS |
| Age [years] | 25 | 31 | 26 | 40 | 67 |
| Time [years] | 5 | 3.5 | 8 | 5 | 1 |
| CRS-R | 16 | 18 | 22 | 9 | 22 |
| Conscious state | MCS | eMCS | eMCS | UWS | eMCS |
Note: TBI—traumatic brain injury, ABI—acquired brain injury, CT—cerebrocranial trauma, HRSS—haemorrhagic right-sided stroke; Time—interval of time from the critical event to the beginning of the study, P—patient, MCS—minimally conscious state, UWS—unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, eMCS—emergence from the minimally conscious state.
Comparisons of durations of the patients’ active work, before and after the oculomotor training course.
| P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | Me | Q1 | Q3 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 10 | 40 | 35 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30.0 | 35.0 | 0.043115 * |
| B2 | 30 | 60 | 45 | 45 | 50 | 45 | 45.0 | 50.0 |
Note: B1—active work duration (minutes)—initial tests, B2—active work duration (minutes)—final tests, ME—median value, Q1—lower quartile, Q3—upper quartile, * p < 0.05000.
Figure 2Study group findings classified into the task categories. Note: T1—results of the initial tests, T2—results of the final tests, A—recognising objects, B—size perception, C—colour perception, D—perception of object structures—letters, E—perception of object structures—objects, F—finding differences between images, G—assembling image pieces into the complete image.
Figure 3Average percentage of the tasks performed by the whole study group. Note: TP1—percentage of tasks performed during the initial tests, TP2—percentage of tasks completed during the final tests.
Wilcoxon matched pairs test for the rates of performed tasks before and after training.
| N | Me | Q1 | Q3 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP 1 | 5 | 0.047619 | 0.00000 | 0.476190 | 0.043115 * |
| TP 2 | 5 | 0.533333 | 0.238095 | 0.714286 |
TP1—the number of tasks performed by the whole study group before training, TP2—the number of tasks performed by the whole study group after training, N—the number of participants, Me—median values, Q1—lower quartile, Q3—upper quartile, * p < 0.05000.