Kara N Corps1, Theodore L Roth1, Dorian B McGavern1. 1. Viral Immunology and Intravital Imaging Section, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health concern that affects individuals in all demographics. With increasing interest in the medical and public communities, understanding the inflammatory mechanisms that drive the pathologic and consequent cognitive outcomes can inform future research and clinical decisions for patients with TBI. OBJECTIVES: To review known inflammatory mechanisms in TBI and to highlight clinical trials and neuroprotective therapeutic manipulations of pathologic and inflammatory mechanisms of TBI. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We searched articles in PubMed published between 1960 and August 1, 2014, using the following keywords: traumatic brain injury, sterile injury, inflammation, astrocytes, microglia, monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, T cells, reactive oxygen species, alarmins, danger-associated molecular patterns, purinergic receptors, neuroprotection, and clinical trials. Previous clinical trials or therapeutic studies that involved manipulation of the discussed mechanisms were considered for inclusion. The final list of selected studies was assembled based on novelty and direct relevance to the primary focus of this review. FINDINGS: Traumatic brain injury is a diverse group of sterile injuries induced by primary and secondary mechanisms that give rise to cell death, inflammation, and neurologic dysfunction in patients of all demographics. Pathogenesis is driven by complex, interacting mechanisms that include reactive oxygen species, ion channel and gap junction signaling, purinergic receptor signaling, excitotoxic neurotransmitter signaling, perturbations in calcium homeostasis, and damage-associated molecular pattern molecules, among others. Central nervous system resident and peripherally derived inflammatory cells respond to TBI and can provide neuroprotection or participate in maladaptive secondary injury reactions. The exact contribution of inflammatory cells to a TBI lesion is dictated by their anatomical positioning as well as the local cues to which they are exposed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The mechanisms that drive TBI lesion development as well as those that promote repair are exceedingly complex and often superimposed. Because pathogenic mechanisms can diversify over time or even differ based on the injury type, it is important that neuroprotective therapeutics be developed and administered with these variables in mind. Due to its complexity, TBI has proven particularly challenging to treat; however, a number of promising therapeutic approaches are now under pre-clinical development, and recent clinical trials have even yielded a few successes. Given the worldwide impact of TBI on the human population, it is imperative that research remains active in this area and that we continue to develop therapeutics to improve outcome in afflicted patients.
IMPORTANCE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health concern that affects individuals in all demographics. With increasing interest in the medical and public communities, understanding the inflammatory mechanisms that drive the pathologic and consequent cognitive outcomes can inform future research and clinical decisions for patients with TBI. OBJECTIVES: To review known inflammatory mechanisms in TBI and to highlight clinical trials and neuroprotective therapeutic manipulations of pathologic and inflammatory mechanisms of TBI. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We searched articles in PubMed published between 1960 and August 1, 2014, using the following keywords: traumatic brain injury, sterile injury, inflammation, astrocytes, microglia, monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, T cells, reactive oxygen species, alarmins, danger-associated molecular patterns, purinergic receptors, neuroprotection, and clinical trials. Previous clinical trials or therapeutic studies that involved manipulation of the discussed mechanisms were considered for inclusion. The final list of selected studies was assembled based on novelty and direct relevance to the primary focus of this review. FINDINGS:Traumatic brain injury is a diverse group of sterile injuries induced by primary and secondary mechanisms that give rise to cell death, inflammation, and neurologic dysfunction in patients of all demographics. Pathogenesis is driven by complex, interacting mechanisms that include reactive oxygen species, ion channel and gap junction signaling, purinergic receptor signaling, excitotoxic neurotransmitter signaling, perturbations in calcium homeostasis, and damage-associated molecular pattern molecules, among others. Central nervous system resident and peripherally derived inflammatory cells respond to TBI and can provide neuroprotection or participate in maladaptive secondary injury reactions. The exact contribution of inflammatory cells to a TBI lesion is dictated by their anatomical positioning as well as the local cues to which they are exposed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The mechanisms that drive TBI lesion development as well as those that promote repair are exceedingly complex and often superimposed. Because pathogenic mechanisms can diversify over time or even differ based on the injury type, it is important that neuroprotective therapeutics be developed and administered with these variables in mind. Due to its complexity, TBI has proven particularly challenging to treat; however, a number of promising therapeutic approaches are now under pre-clinical development, and recent clinical trials have even yielded a few successes. Given the worldwide impact of TBI on the human population, it is imperative that research remains active in this area and that we continue to develop therapeutics to improve outcome in afflicted patients.
Authors: N Braun; J Sévigny; S C Robson; K Enjyoji; O Guckelberger; K Hammer; F Di Virgilio; H Zimmermann Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Christopher N Parkhurst; Guang Yang; Ipe Ninan; Jeffrey N Savas; John R Yates; Juan J Lafaille; Barbara L Hempstead; Dan R Littman; Wen-Biao Gan Journal: Cell Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Juan Pablo de Rivero Vaccari; George Lotocki; Ofelia F Alonso; Helen M Bramlett; W Dalton Dietrich; Robert W Keane Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2009-04-29 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Donald E Kimbler; Jessica Shields; Nathan Yanasak; John R Vender; Krishnan M Dhandapani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ellinor Kenne; Anna Erlandsson; Lennart Lindbom; Lars Hillered; Fredrik Clausen Journal: J Neuroinflammation Date: 2012-01-23 Impact factor: 8.322
Authors: A P Coulibaly; W T Gartman; V Swank; J A Gomes; L Ruozhuo; J DeBacker; J J Provencio Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Rui Cao; Chenchu Zhang; Vladimir V Mitkin; Miles F Lankford; Jun Li; Zhiyi Zuo; Craig H Meyer; Christopher P Goyne; Stephen T Ahlers; James R Stone; Song Hu Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Inga K Koerte; Alexander P Lin; Anna Willems; Marc Muehlmann; Jakob Hufschmidt; Michael J Coleman; Isobel Green; Huijun Liao; David F Tate; Elisabeth A Wilde; Ofer Pasternak; Sylvain Bouix; Yogesh Rathi; Erin D Bigler; Robert A Stern; Martha E Shenton Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Flaubert Tchantchou; Adam A Puche; Ulrich Leiste; William Fourney; Thomas A Blanpied; Gary Fiskum Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Elliot J Glotfelty; Thomas Delgado; Luis B Tovar-Y-Romo; Yu Luo; Barry Hoffer; Lars Olson; Tobias Karlsson; Mark P Mattson; Brandon Harvey; David Tweedie; Yazhou Li; Nigel H Greig Journal: ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci Date: 2019-02-11
Authors: Jennifer Creed; Viviana Cantillana-Riquelme; Bai Hui Yan; Shuang Ma; Dongmei Chu; Haichen Wang; Dennis A Turner; Daniel T Laskowitz; Ulrike Hoffmann Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 3.210