| Literature DB >> 35270336 |
Bo-Lin Pan1, Chia-Pei Chou1, Kun-Siang Huang1, Pin-Jie Bin1, Kuei-Hau Luo2, Hung-Yi Chuang3,4.
Abstract
To investigate the risks of herpes zoster (HZ) infection among heterogeneous HbA1C trajectories of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, this cohort study used data from the Chang Gung Research Database (CGRD), from the 10-year period of 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2017. We applied group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to identify the patterns of HbA1C trajectories, and multiple Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for the risk of HZ infection with adjustment of age, sex, and comorbidities. This study enrolled 121,999 subjects to perform the analysis. The GBTM identified four HbA1C trajectories: 'good control' (58.4%), 'high decreasing' (8.9%), 'moderate control' (25.1%), and 'poor control' (7.6%) with the mean HbA1C of 6.7% (50 mmol/mol), 7.9% (63 mmol/mol), 8.4% (68 mmol/mol), and 10.7% (93 mmol/mol) respectively. The risk of HZ was significantly higher in the poor control with an HR = 1.44 (95% CI 1.26-1.64) after adjustment for confounders and comorbidities. The risk of HZ infection for the high decreasing group (initially poor then rapidly reaching optimal control) was nonsignificant compared to the good control group. In conclusion, the patients with poor glycemic control (mean HbA1C = 10.7%) had the highest risk of HZ infection. The patients with initial hyperglycemia then reaching optimal control could have a lower risk of HZ infection.Entities:
Keywords: glycated hemoglobin; group-based trajectory model (GBTM); herpes zoster; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270336 PMCID: PMC8910017 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052646
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Flowchart of study design and patients.
Figure 2Trajectories (99% CIs) of HbA1C within first 2 years after index date: red line means good control group (58.4% of the population); green line means high decreasing (8.9% of the population); blue line means moderate stable (25.1% of the population); black line means poor control (7.6% of the population) (dot line means 99% confidence interval).
Baseline character by the groups with HbA1C trajectories.
| All | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Control | High Decreasing | Moderate Stable | Poor Control | ||||||||
| Total enrollee | 121,999 | 71,296 (58.4) | 10,888 (8.9) | 30,602 (25.1) | 9213 (7.6) | ||||||
| Herpes Zoster | 2867 | (2.4) | 1621 | (2.3) | 183 | (1.7) | 794 | (2.6) | 269 | (2.9) | <0.0001 |
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 60.4 | (12.6) | 62.1 | (12.4) | 56.1 | (12.7) | 59.6 | (12.1) | 55.6 | (12.6) | <0.0001 |
| Sex, | <0.0001 | ||||||||||
| Male | 65,490 | (53.7) | 38,046 | (53.4) | 6659 | (61.2) | 16,000 | (52.3) | 4785 | (52.0) | |
| Female | 56,509 | (46.3) | 33,250 | (46.6) | 4229 | (38.9) | 14,602 | (47.7) | 4428 | (48.1) | |
| Follow date, years, median (IQR) | 6.1 | (3.2–9.8) | 5.8 | (3.0–9.4) | 5.1 | (2.5–8.1) | 7.2 | (3.8–10.8) | 6.9 | (3.4–10.5) | <0.0001 |
| Mean HbA1C, %, mean (SD) | 7.58 | (1.68) | 6.70 | (0.79) | 7.93 | (2.27) | 8.43 | (1.17) | 10.69 | (1.80) | <0.0001 |
| Comorbidity, | |||||||||||
| Hypertension | 22,440 | (18.4) | 17,973 | (25.2) | 1359 | (12.5) | 2654 | (8.7) | 454 | (4.9) | <0.0001 |
| COPD | 2214 | (1.8) | 1704 | (2.4) | 154 | (1.4) | 293 | (1.0) | 63 | (0.7) | <0.0001 |
| Heart failure | 2701 | (2.2) | 2030 | (2.9) | 153 | (1.4) | 419 | (1.4) | 99 | (1.1) | <0.0001 |
| Ischemic heart disease | 7382 | (6.1) | 5747 | (8.1) | 382 | (3.5) | 1052 | (3.4) | 201 | (2.2) | <0.0001 |
| Stroke | 2958 | (2.4) | 2344 | (3.3) | 185 | (1.7) | 364 | (1.2) | 65 | (0.7) | <0.0001 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 2206 | (1.8) | 1676 | (2.4) | 75 | (0.7) | 373 | (1.2) | 83 | (0.9) | <0.0001 |
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier curve for zoster infection by HbA1C trajectories. The poor control group (black line) had a higher incidence rate than the other 3 groups (log-rank p-value: 0.0250).
Cox regression models with HbA1C trajectories to estimate hazard ratio of zoster.
| Group | Crude HR (95% Cl) | Model 1 † HR (95% Cl) | Model 2 ‡ HR (95% Cl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HbA1C trajectories | ||||||
| Group 1 good control | 1.00 | (reference) | 1.00 | (reference) | 1.00 | (reference) |
| Group 2 high decreasing | 0.87 | (0.74–1.01) | 1.04 | (0.89–1.21) | 1.06 | (0.90–1.23) |
| Group 3 moderate stable | 0.98 | (0.90–1.06) | 1.06 | (0.97–1.15) | 1.08 | (0.99–1.18) |
| Group 4 poor control | 1.15 | (1.01–1.30) | 1.41 | (1.23–1.60) | 1.44 | (1.26–1.64) |
| Age | 1.03 | (1.03–1.04) | 1.03 | (1.03–1.04) | 1.03 | (1.03–1.04) |
| Sex | ||||||
| Female | 1.00 | (reference) | 1.00 | (reference) | 1.00 | (reference) |
| Male | 0.81 | (0.75–0.87) | 0.91 | (0.85–0.98) | 0.90 | (0.83–0.97) |
| Hypertension | 1.16 | (1.05–1.29) | 1.01 | (0.90–1.14) | ||
| COPD | 1.94 | (1.52–2.49) | 1.63 | (1.26–2.09) | ||
| Heart failure | 1.18 | (0.89–1.56) | 0.89 | (0.67–1.19) | ||
| Ischemic heart disease | 1.26 | (1.07–1.48) | 1.10 | (0.92–1.31) | ||
| Stroke | 1.37 | (1.09–1.74) | 1.10 | (0.86–1.40) | ||
| Chronic kidney disease | 2.99 | (2.42–3.68) | 2.80 | (2.26–3.46) | ||
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; † Model 1: adjusted for sex and age; ‡ Model 2: model 1 + adjusted for comorbidities.
The HbA1C in the last year before HZ infection.
| Herpes Zoster | HbA1C %, | ANOVA | Post Hoc Tests by Scheffe’s Method | Difference between Means (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trajectory group | ||||||||
| Poor control | 269 | (2.9) | 9.73 | (1.11) | Poor control vs. moderate stable | 1.53 | (1.38–1.68) * | |
| vs. high decreasing | 1.99 | (1.78–2.20) * | ||||||
| vs. good control | 2.96 | (2.82–3.10) * | ||||||
| Moderate stable | 794 | (2.6) | 8.20 | (0.75) | Moderate stable vs. high decreasing | 0.46 | (0.29–0.64) * | |
| vs. good control | 1.43 | (1.34–1.52) * | ||||||
| High decreasing | 183 | (1.7) | 7.74 | (0.86) | High decreasing vs. good control | 0.96 | (0.80–1.13) * | |
| Good control | 1621 | (2.3) | 6.77 | (0.69) | ||||
CI, confidence interval; * p value < 0.05 indicates significant difference.