| Literature DB >> 35269318 |
Is Fatimah1, Ganjar Fadillah1, Ika Yanti1, Ruey-An Doong2.
Abstract
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) utilizing heterogeneous catalysts have attracted great attention in the last decade. The use of solid catalysts, including metal and metal oxide nanoparticle support materials, exhibited better performance compared with the use of homogeneous catalysts, which is mainly related to their stability in hostile environments and recyclability and reusability. Various solid supports have been reported to enhance the performance of metal and metal oxide catalysts for AOPs; undoubtedly, the utilization of clay as a support is the priority under consideration and has received intensive interest. This review provides up-to-date progress on the synthesis, features, and future perspectives of clay-supported metal and metal oxide for AOPs. The methods and characteristics of metal and metal oxide incorporated into the clay structure are strongly influenced by various factors in the synthesis, including the kind of clay mineral. In addition, the benefits of nanomaterials from a green chemistry perspective are key aspects for their further considerations in various applications. Special emphasis is given to the basic schemes for clay modifications and role of clay supports for the enhanced mechanism of AOPs. The scaling-up issue is suggested for being studied to further applications at industrial scale.Entities:
Keywords: advanced oxidation process; clay; metal nanoparticles; nanoparticles; photocatalysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35269318 PMCID: PMC8912419 DOI: 10.3390/nano12050825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Various AOP methods.
Figure 2Diagram of the reduction–oxidation by Fe2+/Fe3+.
Figure 3The popularity of metal oxides in AOPs observed based on publications during 2019–2020.
Metal oxide nanoparticles for AOP applications.
| Metal/Metal Oxide | Precursor and | Remark | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mn3O4 | Precursor of MnCl2, by the precipitation method | Particle sizes of Mn3O4 nanoparticles are 20–35 nm, Mn3O4 NPs show high activity for the 99.9% degradation of methylene blue by photooxidation | [ |
| ZnO | Zinc acetate precipitation method | ZnO NPs show a removal efficiency of reactive blue of 85.4% | [ |
| γ-Fe2O3 | Synthesized using FeSO4·7H2O by the precipitation method | γ-Fe2O3 NP sizes of 40–50 nm with a phenol degradation activity of 94.5% within 420 min at 80 °C. The NPs shows reusability until the fifth cycle | [ |
| α-Fe2O3 | α-Fe2O3 NPs were in nanocubic form, prepared using a metal-ion-mediated hydrothermal route. | α-Fe2O3 NPs showed photocatalytic activity in rhodamine B degradation | [ |
| CuO | CuO NPs were prepared by reflux and precipitation methods, followed by calcination at different temperatures of 350–550 °C. Particle’s sizes are in the range of 17–34 nm, depending on method and calcination temperature | The highest activity of CuO NPs was exhibited by the NPs prepared by the reflux method and calcined at 450 °C. The highest degradation efficiency toward phenol was 95%. Nanoparticles showed stability until the third cycle | [ |
| SnO2 | SnO2 in nanosphere form was synthesized through a solvothermal method by a SnCl2 precursor | The highest degradation efficiency of rhodamine B was 99% during 90 min under UV light | [ |
Figure 4ZnO (a) nanoflowers, (b) nanorods, (c) nanoflakes, and (d) nanospheres. Reproduced from ref. [54,58,59,60] with permission from the publishers (Springer Nature, 2015; PLOS ONE, 2020; Science Publication, 2009; IOP Publishing, 2020).
Figure 5The possible formation of porous structures and new surfaces as adsorption sites by metal/metal oxide impregnation.
Figure 6Schematic representation of clay pillarization.
Some pillared clays syntheses and highlighted crucial factors for the syntheses.
| Pillared Clay | Precursor | d001 (nm) | Crucial Factor | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe2O3-rectorite | Na2CO3 solution in mixture with Fe(NO3)3 at the molar ratio Na:Fe of 1:1, under stirring at 25 °C | 0.25 | - | [ |
| TiO2/montmorillonite | Tetrabutyl titanate in mixture with HCl by slowly dropping 0.5 of [Ti]:[H+] molar ratio under stirring 1.0 h | 0.357 | Calcination temperature determined the specific surface area | [ |
| TiO2/montmorillonite | Various pillaring precursor: | 0.2–0.3 | HCl:Ti molar ratio; temperature at which the pillaring solution is prepared; clay suspension concentration; mmol of Ti:clay ratio; and calcination temperature | [ |
| Fe2O3-pillared bentonite | FeCl3 and NaOH at a molar ratio −OH:Fe = 1:1, stirred at room temperature overnight | 0.06–0.84 | Fe molar-to-mass ratio influencing the specific surface area and basal spacing d001 | [ |
| Fe2O3-pillared montmorillonite | Trinuclear acetate Fe(III) ion, [Fe3(OCOCH3)7OH·2H2O] | 0.1 | Fe molar-to-mass ratio influencing the specific surface area | [ |
| Fe2O3-pillared montmorillonite | FeCl3 and NaOH at the molar ratio −OH:Fe = 1:1, stirring for 4 h at room temperature | - | −OH:Fe molar ratio, Fe content and calcination temperature are the important parameters influencing the character of pillared clay | [ |
| SnO2/montmorillonite | Slowly titrated with NaOH and SnCl2 solution with Sn:OH molar ratio of 1:1, stirred overnight | 1.4–1.6 nm | Sn molar-to-mass ratio influencing the specific surface area, basal spacing d001, and particle size of SnO2 | [ |
| Cu/Al-pillared bentonite | Cu2+/(Al3++Cu2+) molar ratios 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2. | 0.7–0.88 | Cu2+/(Al3++Cu2+) molar ratios determined the increasing d001 and specific surface area | [ |
| TiO2-pillared montmorillonite | The mixture of HCl-Ti isopropoxide at the HCl:Ti molar ratio of 10 | The calcination by microwave irradiation influenced by the power of microwave | [ | |
| Al/Fe-pillared clay | AlCl3 in mixture with FeCl3 titrated with NaOH | The starting clay | [ | |
| Al/Fe-pillared clay | AlCl3 in mixture with FeCl3 titrated with NaOH | 0.45 | Al:Fe molar ratio influenced the physicochemical character of material | [ |
| SnO2/montmorillonite | SnCl2 in mixture with NaOH at the Sn:OH molar ratio of 1:1 | Sn:montmorillonite mass ratio influenced the character of materials | [ | |
| TiO2-pillared montmorillonite | Titanium isopropoxide-HCl | 0.25 | Microwave power influenced the physicochemical character of material | [ |
| Al-Fe pillared clay | FeCl3 and AlCl3 with the molar ratio of Al:Fe = 5:1, titrated with NaOH under vigorous stirring to obtain a molar ratio of OH:(Al+Fe) = 2 | 0.46 | Al:Fe and OH:(Al+Fe) = 2 determining the basal spacing d001 and specific surface area | [ |
| ZnO/sepiolite heterostructure | Zn-acetate and KOH in methanol under precipitation method | Not reported | Material has capability to be support for Fe2O3 | [ |
| SnO2/bentonite | SnCl2 at various contents (10, 20, and 30 wt.%) in mixture with NaOH at the pH of 11–12, stirred at 60 °C | Not reported | Material has the capability to effectively degrade MB | [ |
| TiO2/sepiolite | Tetrabutyl titanate (TBT) and acetic acid under solvothermal | Not reported | Material has the capability to effectively degrade MB | [ |
| TiO2/montmorillonite | Titanium tetraisopropoxide was added to a vigorously stirred acetic acid solution of 80 wt.%. The resulting white slurry was stirred at 323 K to give a clear TiO2 sol | 0.48 | Kind of clay determined the hydrophobicity of pillared clay | [ |
| TiO2/montmorillonite | TiCl4 was diluted with CH2Cl2 to obtain a clear solution. Then, the mixture was slowly added to Na–M suspension under vigorous stirring at 65 °C for 4 h under reflex system | 1.60 | The Ti content in TiO2–M was 48.6 wt.% with an anatase crystallite size of about 15–20 nm | [ |
| ZrO2/bentonite | A zirconium polycation solution was prepared by the slow titration of a ZrCl4 solution (0.1 M) with a solution of NaOH (0.2 M) under vigorous stirring, using an OH:Zr molar ratio equal to 4:1. | 0.95 | Ageing temperature of intercalated bentonite influences the distribution of polyoxocations | [ |
| TiO2/montmorillonite | Titanium polycation solution was prepared by the hydrolysis of TiCl4 | 0.20 | Hydrothermal treatment and calcination temperature influenced the increasing d001 and titanium dioxide phase | [ |
Figure 7XRD patterns and SEM images of Fe-pillared bentonite with varied Fe content (5 and 10 mmol/10 g). Adapted from Ref. [123] with permission from BCREC Group.
Figure 8TEM images of SnO2/montmorillonite at Sn/montmorillonite ratios of (a) 2.5 and (b) 10.0 mmol/10 g. Adapted from Ref. [80] with permission from the Elsevier B.V., 2021.
Figure 9The effect of the metal:clay ratio on the Δd001 of pillared clays.
Figure 10Schematic representation of metal nanoparticle impregnation onto PILC.
Figure 11Schematic representation of porous clay heterostructure synthesis.
Figure 12Schematic representation of the dispersion of metal nanoparticles in clay structure.
Some clay-supported metal or metal oxide nanomaterial for AOPs applications.
| Clay-Supported Metal or Metal Oxide Nanomaterial | Target Molecule | Process | Remark | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MnO2 nanosheet/montmorillonite | MB | CO | MB removal achieved 99.89% at 5 min and the catalyst dose of 0.4 g/L | [ |
| MnO2/montmorillonite | Bisphenol A | CO | Bisphenol A removal was almost 100% after 20 min of treatment | [ |
| K-MnO2/CeO2/Palygorskite | Phenol | CO | 90% of phenol removal for the treatment at 130 °C for 103 min | [ |
| Fe/Palygorskite | Phenol | CO | CWPO of MB using Cu NPs/montmorillonite gave complete removal | [ |
| Fe2O3/montmorillonite | phenol | PCPO | Complete phenol oxidation reached at 90 min | [ |
| Fe2O3/montmorillonite | Diethyl phthalate | CPO | The material showed stability and reusability with insignificant change of photocatalytic activity until 3 cycles | [ |
| Fe2O3/montmorillonite | Toluene | CO | Complete toluene oxidation reached at 300 °C | [ |
| MnO2/Al2O3-pillared montmorillonite | Acetone | CO | Complete acetone oxidation reached at a temperature of 7500 K | [ |
| MnO2/ZrO2-pillared montmorillonite | Acetone | CO | 40% of acetone oxidation reached at a temperature of 7500 K | [ |
| Cu NPs/montmorillonite | Methylene blue (MB) | CWPO | CWPO of MB using Cu NPs/montmorillonite gave complete removal | [ |
| Cu NPs/montmorillonite | Atrazine | CWPO | Nanomaterials exhibited adsorption and catalytic oxidation activity for atrazine removal with DE of 82.12% and 85.94%, respectively | [ |
| Cu-impregnated Al-pillared montmorillonite | Reactive orange 16 (RO16) | CWPO | Complete removal of RO16 after 90 min by both AOP mechanisms | [ |
| Fe/Co-pillared clay | Paracetamol | CWPO | Optimum condition for completely paracetamol removal was treatment for 6 h, H2O2 concentration of 472 mg L−1, catalyst dose of 2.5 g L−1, temperature of 80 °C, and initial pH = 3.5 | [ |
| Zr-pillared clay | 4-nitrophenol | CWPO | Complete removal at 4 h with small amount of H2O2 and catalyst loading of 2.5 g/L) | [ |
| Al/Zr-pillared clay | Phenol | CWPO | The optimum condition for the CWAO process is a pH of 3, reaction temperature of 100 °C, catalyst dosage of 2 g/L, and oxygen pressure of 10 bar. The reaction obeys the first-order power rate law kinetics model with the apparent activation energy of 21.306 kJ/mol | [ |
| Zr immobilized in Cu/Al-pillared clay | Winery wastewater | CWPO | The presence of Zr enhanced the oxidation capability of the catalyst | |
| Fe- and Cu-immobilized in Zr-pillared clay (Fe/Cu/Zr-APILC) | 4-nitrophenol | CWPO | Complete removal after 2 h; the highest TOC removal (65.1% after 8 h) was obtained with Fe/Cu/Zr-APILC | [ |
| Co-immobilized AL-pillared clay | Tartrazine | CO | Co2+ was impregnated onto aluminum-pillared clay and utilized as tartrazine oxidation via PMS | |
| Copper-pillared ferrioxalate-modified bentonite (Cu/PBC) | 4-nitrophenol | PCPO | Maximum DE of 99.89% was achieved with an excess of H2O2, and catalyst loading of 2.0 g/L during 6 min of visible light illumination. | [ |
| Al–Fe-pillared clay | 4-NP | CWPO | Maximum DE of 99.7% with TOC removal and COD removal of 83.6% and 75%, respectively, attained after 300 min with an excess of H2O2 at 50 °C | [ |
| Al–Cu–Fe-pillared clay | 4-NP | CWPO | Maximum DE of 99.7% with TOC removal and COD removal of 63% and 65%, respectively, attained after 300 min with an excess of H2O2 at 50 °C | [ |
| Al–Cu PILCs | 4-NP | CWPO | Maximum DE of 99.7% with TOC removal and COD removal of 60% and 55%, respectively, attained after 300 min with an excess of H2O2 at 50 °C | [ |
| Al/Fe-, and Al/(Fe–Cu)- bentonite | Methyl orange (MO) | CWPO | The Al/Fe-pillared bentonite attained the complete removal of MO after 1 h of reaction at room temperature | [ |
| Cu-doped Fe-pillared Tunisian clay (Cu/Fe–PILC) | Phenol | PCPO | Cu/Fe–PILC demonstrated stability for a wide range of pH, from 3 to 7, for the PCPO process of phenol removal. Nanocomposite showed reusability with negligible metal leaching without a noticeable loss of activity | [ |
| Fe-pillared clay (Fe-PILC) | Phenol | PCPO | Phenol removal efficiency of 100% was achieved after 60 min of photocatalytic oxidation reaction UV 254 nm | [ |
| Fe2O3-Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NIO) supported in montmorillonite (NIOM) | MO | PCPO | NIOM exhibited a higher photocatalytic activity compared with Fe2O3–Fe3O4 | [ |
| Fe2O3/kaolin | Rhodamine B (RhB) | PCPO | DE of 98% by using 1 g/L of catalyst and 0.05 mol/L of H2O2 for 120 min. The Fe2O3–kaolin catalyst displayed high photocatalytic activity in a wide pH range of 2.21–10.13 |
Figure 13Potential diagram of some semiconductors.