| Literature DB >> 33804931 |
Guangfeng Xiao1, Tiantian Xu1, Muhammad Faheem1, Yanxing Xi1, Ting Zhou1, Haseeb Tufail Moryani1, Jianguo Bao1, Jiangkun Du1.
Abstract
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based on peroxydisulfate (PDS) or peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation have attracted much research attention in the last decade for the degradation of recalcitrant organic contaminants. Sulfate (SO4•-) and hydroxyl (•OH) radicals are most frequently generated from catalytic PDS/PMS decomposition by thermal, base, irradiation, transition metals and carbon materials. In addition, increasingly more recent studies have reported the involvement of singlet oxygen (1O2) during PDS/PMS-based AOPs. Typically, 1O2 can be produced either along with SO4•- and •OH or discovered as the dominant reactive oxygen species (ROSs) for pollutants degradation. This paper reviews recent advances in 1O2 generation during PDS/PMS activation. First, it introduces the basic chemistry of 1O2, its oxidation properties and detection methodologies. Furthermore, it elaborates different activation strategies/techniques, including homogeneous and heterogeneous systems, and discusses the possible reaction mechanisms to give an overview of the principle of 1O2 production by activating PDS/PMS. Moreover, although 1O2 has shown promising features such as high degradation selectivity and anti-interference capability, its production pathways and mechanisms remain controversial in the present literatures. Therefore, this study identifies the research gaps and proposes future perspectives in the aspects of novel catalysts and related mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: activation; degradation; organic contaminants; peroxydisulfate; peroxymonosulfate; singlet oxygen
Year: 2021 PMID: 33804931 PMCID: PMC8036714 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1(a) Reported pathways of 1O2 evolution; (b) the quenching effect of 1O2 on phenol degradation with β-MnO2 (data reorganized from [19]); (c) EPR characteristic spectrum of TEMP-1O2 (figure reprinted from [31]). The EPR spectrometer settings were as follows: modulation frequency, 100 kHz; modulation width, 0.079 mT; scanning field, 335 ± 10 mT; amplitude: 2–500; time constant, 0.1–0.3 s; sweep time, 4 min; microwave power, 4 mW; and microwave frequency, 9.41 GHz.; (d) oxidation pathways of some emerging contaminants by 1O2 [8,34,38], reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 2Evolution of 1O2 in homogeneous activation systems requiring different alkaline conditions.
Performance and mechanism for PDS/PMS oxidation of pollutants in typical homogenous systems.
| Systems | Target/Pollutant | Degradation Rate and Time | Radicals Involve | Active Catalytic SitesOr Activation Mechanism | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| phenols/PMS | sulfamethoxazole | 100% in 60 min at pH 10 | 1O2 | quinone intermediates formed from phenolic parents | Zhou et al. [ |
| PMS | chlorophenols | 65% of 4-CP, 70% of 2,4-DCP and 95% of 2,4,6-TCP in 60 min at pH 9 | 1O2, SO4•−, •OH | chlorophenols | Li et al. [ |
| ketones/PMS | / | / | 1O2, | ketone carbonyl | Lange and Brauer [ |
| benzoquinone/PMS | sulfamethoxazole | 86% in 3 min at pH 10 | 1O2 | quinone carbonyl | Zhou et al. [ |
| benzoquinone/PMS | / | / | 1O2 | quinone carbonyl | Zhang et al. [ |
| Cl−/phenol/PMS | phenols | 100% in 60 min at pH 10 | 1O2 | Cl− interact with PMS to form chlorophenols and benzoquinone | Li et al. [ |
| base/PMS | acid orange 7 | 90% in 60 min | 1O2, O2•− | O2•− intermediates for 1O2 generation under too much pH conditions | Qi et al. [ |
| base/polyphosphates/PMS | acid orange 7 | 100% in 500 s | 1O2, O2•− | remains unclear | Luo et al. [ |
| BO2−/PMS | acid red 1 | 97.8% in 10 min | 1O2 | nucleophilic mechanisms | Rao et al. [ |
| CO32−/PMS | acid orange 7 | 100% in 40 min | 1O2, O2•− | PMS self-decomposition, O2•− intermediates by base-catalyzed hydrolysis for 1O2 generation | Nie et al. [ |
| Cl−/PMS | 2,4-dimethylphenol | 100% in 20 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2, Cl• | / | Wang et al. [ |
| Cl−/PMS | methylene blue | 100% in 120 min | 1O2, Cl• | PMS self-decomposition, reactive chlorine | Yang et al. [ |
Performance and mechanism of typical MFCMs catalysts for PDS/PMS oxidation of pollutants.
| Catalyst | Oxidant | Target Pollutant | Degradation Rate and Time | Radicals Mechanism | Active Catalytic Sites | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reduced graphene oxide | PMS | phenol | 100% | 45 min | 1O2 | sp2 carbon, defective edges | Duan et al. [ |
| single-wall carbon nanotubes | PDS | 4-chlorophenol | 100% | 60 min | 1O2 | sp2 carbon, nonradical electron-transfer | Yun et al. [ |
| carbon nanotubes | PDS | phenol | 100% | 30 min | / | nonradical electron-transfer | Ren et al. [ |
| carbon nanotubes | PDS | 2,4-dichlorophenol | 95.9% | 30 min | 1O2, O2•− | sp2 carbon | Cheng et al. [ |
| nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes | PMS | phenol | 95.6% | 10 min | / | nonradical electron-transfer | Ren et al. [ |
| N-doping reduced graphene oxide | PMS | Sulfachloro-pyridazine | 100% | 9 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | hydroxyl group, sp2 carbon, pyridine N, pyrrole N, graphite N | Kang et al. [ |
| N-S co-doped graphene | PMS | methyl | 100% | 30 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | sp2 carbon, pyrrolic N, pyridinic N, graphitic N, thiophenic S | Sun et al. [ |
| amino-functionalized mesoporous silica anchoring N-doped graphene oxide | PMS | bisphenol A | 100% | 600 min | 1O2 | sp2 carbon, phenolic hydroxyl group, amino group | Zhang et al. [ |
| sludge-biochar (600 °C) | PMS | bisphenol | 100% | 30 min | 1O2 | ketone structure inside the biochar | Huang et al. [ |
| biochar doped with N and S | PMS | metolachlor | about 80% | 120 min | •OH, 1O2 | surface ketone of biochar | Ding et al. [ |
| porous nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide | PMS | phenol | 100% | 25 min | •OH, 1O2, O2•− | structure vacancies with two nitrogen atoms of graphene structure | Wu et al. [ |
| sludge-derived biochar | PDS | sulfamethoxazole | 94.6% | 180 min | 1O2 | sp2 carbon, Fe(II), N atoms | Yin et al. [ |
| nitrogen-doped sludge carbon | PMS | methylene blue | 98.7% | 20 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | not mentioned | Hu et al. [ |
| graphited nanodiamond | PDS | phenol | 100% | 10 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | nonradical electron-transfer | Lee et al. [ |
| nano diamonds with a core/shell structure | PMS | phenol | 100% | 90 min | / | sp2/sp3 carbon of graphite structure | Duan er al. [ |
| porous carbon aerogel | PDS | rhodamine B | 100% | 60 min | 1O2, O2•− | sp2 carbon, defective edges and the carbon edges of carbon aerogel | Jiang et al. [ |
| N-doped chitosan-derived carbon nanosheets | PMS | sulfacetamide | 100% | 10 min | 1O2, O2•− | sp2 carbon, graphitic N | Chen et al. [ |
Figure 3(a) The proposed active sites of MFCMs for 1O2 evolution via catalytic PDS/PMS activation. (b) The XPS spectra of N 1s for doping N element in different states [67], reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
Performance and mechanism of typical heterogeneous metallic catalysts for PDS/PMS oxidation of pollutants.
| Oxidant | Catalyst | Target/Pollutant | Degradation Rate and Time | Radicals Involve | Active Catalytic SitesOr Activation Mechanism | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDS | β-MnO2 | phenol | over 99% | 180 min | 1O2, O2•− | metastable manganese intermediates for O2•− generation | Zhu et al. [ |
| sheet-like CuO | 2,4,6-trichlorophenol | 90% | 180 min | •OH, non-radical | facet (001) of CuO, electron-defective center | Du et al. [ | |
| CoFe2O4-x | bisphenol A | 98% | 60 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | Fe(III)/Fe(II), Co(III)/Co(II), oxygen vacancies, | Wu et al. [ | |
| CuO | ciprofloxacin | 100% | 30 min | 1O2, O2•−, SO4•− •OH | Cu(II)/Cu(III) for O2•− and 1O2, Cu(I)/Cu(II) for SO4•−, •OH | Xing et al. [ | |
| PMS | LaNiO3 | ofloxacin | 93% | 10 min | 1O2, SO4•−, •OH | Ni(III)/Ni(II), oxygen vacancies | Gao et al. [ |
| nZVI/Cu2+ | rhodamine B | 99.3% | 60 min | 1O2, O2•−, SO4•−, •OH | Fe(III)/Fe(II), Cu(II)/Cu(I) | Li et al. [ | |
| Fe0-Mt | bisphenol A | 99.3% at pH 3 | 120 min | 1O2, O2•−, SO4•−, •OH | Fe0, released Fe2+ | Yang et al. [ | |
| CoOOH | 2,4-dichlorophenol | 100% | 120 min | 1O2, O2•−, SO4•− •OH | Co(III)/Co(II), -OH | Zhang et al. [ | |
| Co3O4/CO32− | bisphenol A | 100% | 10 min | 1O2, O2•−, SO4•− •OH | Co(III)/Co(II), OH−, CO32− | Zhu et al. [ | |
| Mn oxides in different structure | atrazine | 100% | 100 min | 1O2, SO4•−, •OH | Mn(IV)/Mn(III), Mn(III)/Mn(II) | Zeng et al. [ | |
| δ-MnO2 | bisphenol A | 42% | 10 min | 1O2, SO4•−, •OH | δ-MnO2 direct oxidation, Mn(IV)/Mn(III) | Huang et al. [ | |
| Mn-g-C3N4 | acetaminophen | 100% | 15 min | 1O2, O2•− | Mn(III)/Mn(II) in the N-pot | Fan et al. [ | |
| Oxygen-defective MnO2 | bisphenol A | 100% | 60 min | 1O2, SO4•−, •OH | oxygen vacancies | Yu et al. [ | |
| CuO | bisphenol A | 100% | 60 min | 1O2, O2•− | Cu(II)-(O)-OSO3− formed on surface of CuO for O2•− generation | Wang et al. [ | |
| magnetic CuO nanosheet | AO7 in high salinity wastewater | 95.8% | 30 min | 1O2, SO4•−, •OH | synergistic effect of Cu(I)/Cu(II) and Fe(II)/Fe(III) | Li et al. [ | |
| copper substituted zinc ferrate | ciprofloxacin | 96.6% | 15 min | 1O2, O2•−, SO4•−, •OH | Fe(III)/Fe(II), Cu(II)/ Cu(I), oxygen vacancies | Yu et al. [ | |
| CuO-CeO2 | rhodamine B | 100% | 60 min | 1O2, O2•−, SO4•−, •OH | Ce(IV)/Ce(III), Cu(II)/Cu(I), oxygen vacancies, electron transfer | Li et al. [ | |
| CuOMgO/Fe3O4 | 4-chlorophenol | 100% | 40 min | 1O2, O2•− | [≡Cu(III)–OOSO3] intermediates for O2•− generation | Jawad et al. [ | |
| Co2Mn1O4 | triclosan phenol | 96.4% | 30 min | 1O2, SO4•− | oxygen vacancies, Co(II)/Co(III), Mn(III)/Mn(II)/Mn(IV) | Chen et al. [ | |
| LaCo0.4Cu0.6O3 | phenol | 100% | 12 min | 1O2, SO4•−, •OH | Co(II)/Co(III), Cu(II)/Cu(I), oxygen vacancies | Lu et al. [ | |
Performance and mechanism of metal-carbon nanocomposite catalysts for PDS/PMS oxidation of pollutants.
| Oxidant | Catalyst | Target/Pollutant | Degradation Rate and Time | Radicals Involve | Active Catalytic SitesOr Activation Mechanism | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDS | oxidation biochar supported magnetite particles | tetracycline | 92.3% | 120 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | Fe(II)/Fe(III), sp2-hybrid C atom with defective structures, ketone groups mediated electron transfer | Pi et al. [ |
| Nuclear-shell structure iron-carbon | bisphenol A | 96% | 30 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2, O2•− | Fe0 Fe(II)/Fe(III), electron transfer for O2•− formation to produce 1O2 | Liu et al. [ | |
| PMS | sludge-derived magnetic Fe0/Fe3C | ciprofloxacin | 99% | 20 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2, O2•− | Fe0, Fe(II)/Fe(III), electron transfer for O2•− formation to produce 1O2 | Zhu et al. [ |
| Fe3C embedded on carbon | ibuprofen | 100% | 30 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | Fe(II)/Fe(III), N-doped carbon area, enhanced electron transfer process due to the carbon shell | Zhang et al. [ | |
| iron and nitrogen co-doped porous carbon | bisphenol F | 97.1% | 90 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2, O2•− | pyridine N, graphite N, adjacent C region of Fe-doping | Wu et al. [ | |
| N-doped porous carbon embedded with CoO nanodots | chlorophenol | 100% | 30 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | Co(II)/Co(III), increase defects sites of C by CoO doping, enhanced electron transfer by N doping | Xie et al. [ | |
| core-shell Co@C nanoparticles with nitrogen and sulfur | 100% | 45 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | sp2 carbon, defect sites procuced by Co and N doping, Co(II)/Co(III) | Tian et al. [ | ||
| CoFe alloy nanoparticles encapsulated in nitrogen doped graphitic carbon | norfloxacin | 94.4% | 20 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | Co(II)/Co(III), Fe(II)/Fe(III), neighboring C atoms of graphitic N, self-decomposition of PMS | Ding et al. [ | |
| carbon-based Fe-Co oxide derived from Prussian blue | 4-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester | 95.5% | 60 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | Co(II)/Co(III), Fe(II)/Fe(III), sp2 hybridized carbon, pyridinic-N and pyrrolic-N | Liu et al. [ | |
| Pd nanoparticles anchored C3N4 | bisphenol A | 91% | 60 min | SO4•−, •OH, 1O2 | Pd0/Pd(II), electron transfer for 1O2 production | Wang et al. [ | |
Figure 4(a) TEM images of core-shell structure and (b) LSV curves of Fe@CNs [94], reprinted with permission from Elsevier; (c) TEM image of CoO nanodots distribution inside the carbon layers [102], reprinted with permission from Elsevier; (d) performance of CoO-N-C composite in comparison with other catalyst; (e) its catalytic mechanism [102], reprinted with permission; (f) schematic diagram of multi-ROSs generation in PMS/PDS activation systems with carbon/metal composite catalysts.
Figure 5Schematic illustration of pathways of PMS/PDS activation in metal-catalyzed heterogeneous systems. P1: redox cycling; P2: formation of metal-PMS/PDS complex; P3: generation of oxygen vacancies; P4: PMS/PDS self-decomposition.