| Literature DB >> 35269065 |
Dmitrii Pavlov1,2, Alexey Zhizhchenko1,2, Lei Pan3, Aleksandr A Kuchmizhak1,4.
Abstract
The optical response of properly excited periodically arranged plasmonic nanostructures is known to demonstrate sharp resonance features associated with high-Q collective modes demanding for various applications in light-matter interaction, filtering and sensing. Meanwhile, practical realization and replication of plasmonic platforms supporting high-Q modes via scalable inexpensive lithography-free approach is still challenging. Here, we justify direct ablation-free irradiation of Si-supported thin Au film by nanojoule-energy femtosecond laser pulses as a single-step and scalable technology for realization of plasmonic metasurfaces supporting collective plasmonic response. Using an adjustable aperture to control and upscale the size of the fabricated nanostructures, nanobumps and nanojets, we demonstrated plasmonic metasurface supporting collective resonances with a moderately high Q-factor (up to 17) and amplitude (up to 45%) within expanded spectral range (1.4-4.5 µm). Vacuum deposition of thin films above the as-fabricated nanostructure arrays was demonstrated to provide fine tuning of the resonance position, also expanding the choice of available materials for realization of plasmonic designs with extended functionality.Entities:
Keywords: collective resonances; direct laser processing; femtosecond laser pulses; noble metal films; plasmonic nanostructures
Year: 2022 PMID: 35269065 PMCID: PMC8911911 DOI: 10.3390/ma15051834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) Schematically illustrated setup for direct laser fabrication of nanostructure arrays using adjustable aperture to control the effective NA of the focusing objective. Insets show SEM images of typical nanostructure arrays with square arrangement and a periodicity Λ as well as optical photograph of the large-scale nanobump array. (b) Series of side-view SEM images of the isolated nanostructures produced at NA = 0.65 and applied pulse energy E ranging from 1.3 to 5.4 nJ. (c,d) FTIR reflectance spectra of the nanostructure arrays produced at variable pulse energy E and fixed array period Λ = 1.2 µm (c) and variable Λ and fixed E = 2 nJ (d).
Figure 2(a–c) Squared lateral size of the surface modification (nanobump or nanojet) D2 as a function of the natural logarithm of the applied pulse energy lnE (in nJ) measured for three calibrated positions of the iris aperture that tailors the optical diameter D of the laser focal spot. Corresponding linear fits of the obtained data give the characteristic energy deposition diameters D of 0.92 (a), 1.27 (b) and 3.12 µm (c). The intersection of the linear fit with the x-axis indicates the threshold applied pulse energy E = 1 (a), 1.7 (b) and 8.4 nJ (c). Insets in (a,c) provide focal-plane optical images of the resulting laser beam used for nanostructure fabrication. (d) Series of side-view (view angle of 45°) and top-view SEM images showing a scalable increase in the geometric dimensions of the laser-fabricated nanostructures (a nanobump with a small nanojet atop) upon the decrease in the effective NA of the microscope objective from 0.65 to 0.2 using an adjustable iris aperture. All nanostructures were produced at a fixed fluence of 0.21 ± 0.02 J/cm2. (e,f) FTIR reflectance spectra of the nanostructure arrays (200 × 200 nanostructures) produced using laser beam focusing at effective NA of 0.49 (e) and 0.2 (f). The array period Λ was 2 (e) and 2.5 µm (f).
Figure 3(a) Series of representative FTIR reflection spectra of the nanobump arrays exhibiting the highest CPR Q-factor for the different combinations of Λ, E and effective NA of the focusing objective. All nanostructure arrays were produced by gradually increasing laser fluence from 0.213 to 0.265 J/cm2 from left to right. (b) Top-view SEM images of the nanobump arrays (Λ = 2 µm and E = 4.5 nJ) fabricated in square and disordered arrangements and their corresponding FTIR reflectance spectra. (c) FTIR reflection spectra of the nanobump arrays produced with (top) and without (bottom) synchronization of the femtosecond laser system with the nanopositioning stages. Both arrays were printed at fluence of 0.24 J/cm2 and NA = 0.3. (d) Series of FTIR reflectance spectra of the nanostructure arrays before (solid curves) and after their consecutive capping with a 20 nm thick Al2O3 layer and a 10 nm thick Pt layer (dashed curves). The nanostructure arrays were produced at Λ = 1 µm and applied pulse energy E = 1.6 (top), 2.5 (middle) and 2.9 nJ (bottom) using NA = 0.65. Top inset schemes compare the nanobump geometry, while the bottom inset SEM images illustrate the nanoscale morphology of the coated nanobump. Scale bar is 100 nm.