| Literature DB >> 35268734 |
Juan Alcañiz-Monge1, María Del Carmen Román-Martínez1, María Ángeles Lillo-Ródenas1.
Abstract
This paper provides the basis for understanding the preparation and properties of an old, but advanced material: activated carbon. The activated carbons discussed herein are obtained from "green" precursors: biomass residues. Accordingly, the present study starts analyzing the components of biomass residues, such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and the features that make them suitable raw materials for preparing activated carbons. The physicochemical transformations of these components during their heat treatment that lead to the development of a carbonized material, a biochar, are also considered. The influence of the chemical activation experimental conditions on the yield and porosity development of the final activated carbons are revised as well, and compared with those for physical activation, highlighting the physicochemical interactions between the activating agents and the lignocellulosic components. This review incorporates a comprehensive discussion about the surface chemistry that can be developed as a result of chemical activation and compiles some results related to the mechanical properties and conformation of activated carbons, scarcely analyzed in most published papers. Finally, economic, and environmental issues involved in the large-scale preparation of activated carbons by chemical activation of lignocellulosic precursors are commented on as well.Entities:
Keywords: activated carbons; biomass; chemical activation; lignocellulosic
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35268734 PMCID: PMC8911564 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27051630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Raw materials used in the preparation of activated carbons [13,25,27,37].
|
| |
| Fruit pits | Olive, avocado, apricot, cherry, plum, date, mango, peach |
| Nut shells | Almond, hazelnut, coconut, walnut, pistachio |
| Soft shells | Avocado, pomegranate, orange, banana, yucca, corn, watermelon |
| Seeds | Orange, guava, palm, rapeseed |
| Seed husk | Rice, wheat, oat, peanut, coffee, cocoa |
| Processing paste | Flaxseed, vinegar must, apple pulp, oil, coffee |
| Fibers | Coconut, palm, banana, jute |
|
| |
| Stems and leaves for pruning and harvesting | Cereal straw (wheat), sunflower, cotton, hemp, esparto, bamboo, cane bagasse, corn, tobacco, vine, kenaf, jute, tea |
| Wood | Tree bark and/or sawdust (eucalyptus, fir, pine, holm oak, olive, acacia, palm …) |
|
| |
| Waste materials from organic compounds | Plastics (PVC, PET), tires, paper, cardboard, wastes from the pulp industry, from the pickling of skins, textile industry. |
| Inorganic wastes | Sewage sludge, steel industry sludge. |
|
| |
| Coal | Peat, lignite, subituminous, anthracite, fly ash, coal tar |
| Petroleum/oil | Pitch, coke |
Elemental analysis of coals [38].
| Precursor | Ultimate Analysis (% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | O | N | S | |
| Peat | 50–60 | 6.0–6.5 | 30–35 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Lignite | 65–70 | 5.0–5.5 | 22–26 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Subbituminous | 70–76 | 5.0 | 15–22 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| Bituminous | 76–87 | 4.0–5.0 | 10–15 | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Anthracite | 90–95 | 2.0–3.0 | 1–3 | 1.0 | - |
* dmmf: dry mineral matter free.
Elemental analysis, lignocellulosic composition, and ash content of biomass precursors weight percentage on air-dried basis [12,18,19,37,46].
| Precursor | Ultimate Analysis | Lignocellulosic Composition (wt %) | Ash (wt %) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | O | N | Cellulose | Hemicellulose | Lignin | ||
| Almond shell | 49.5 | 6.3 | 44.0 | 0.2 | 32 | 26 | 25 | 2.2 |
| Coconut shell | 48.7 | 6.3 | 43.4 | 1.5 | 41 | 27 | 29 | 4.0 |
| Palm shell | 47.8 | 6.0 | 45.3 | 0.9 | 30 | 17 | 53 | 4.2 |
| Hazelnut shell | 47.0 | 6.5 | 46.0 | 1.0 | 25 | 28 | 42 | 1.4 |
| Peanut shell | 41.5 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 45 | 8 | 33 | 4.3 |
| Palm kernel shell | 43.6 | 4.9 | 51.6 | 0.5 | 30 | 21 | 47 | 2.4 |
| Peach stone | 45.9 | 6.1 | 47.4 | 0.6 | 46 | 14 | 33 | 1.5 |
| Olive stone | 45.0 | 5.8 | 48.3 | 0.2 | 32 | 33 | 30 | 2.1 |
| Date pits | 45.6 | 7.1 | 46.5 | 0.7 | 24 | 27 | 22 | 1.0 |
| Orange peel | 46.6 | 6.1 | 47.1 | 0.2 | 65 | 5 | 20 | 1.0 |
| Tomato waste | 59.0 | 8.2 | 29.8 | 0.3 | 33 | 24 | 35 | 1.6 |
| Tobaco stalk | 46.2 | 6.1 | 43.4 | 2.4 | 42 | 28 | 27 | 2.4 |
| Cotton stalk | 41.2 | 5.0 | 34.0 | 2.6 | 39 | 17 | 29 | 5.0 |
| Corn stalk | 45.5 | 6.2 | 41.1 | 0.8 | 23 | 43 | 16 | 7.5 |
| Corn cob | 46.3 | 5.6 | 42.2 | 0.6 | 43 | 37 | 15 | 3.5 |
| Olive tree pruning | 49.9 | 6.0 | 43.4 | 0.7 | 29 | 21 | 27 | 5.0 |
| Vineyward pruning | 47.6 | 5.6 | 41.1 | 1.8 | 38 | 34 | 27 | 3.5 |
| Peach tree pruning | 53.0 | 5.9 | 39.1 | 0.3 | 31 | 28 | 28 | 3.7 |
| Oats straw | 46.0 | 5.9 | 43.5 | 1.1 | 35 | 37 | 18 | 8.7 |
| Sunflower straw | 52.9 | 6.6 | 35.9 | 1.4 | 32 | 19 | 22 | 9.0 |
| Barley straw | 46.2 | 5.8 | 41.9 | 0.6 | 38 | 35 | 16 | 7.0 |
| Rice straw | 49.5 | 6.1 | 44.3 | 0.2 | 38 | 32 | 12 | 20.0 |
| Wheat straw | 42.7 | 5.6 | 39.7 | 0.3 | 33 | 20 | 15 | 3.7 |
Figure 1Experimental parameters involved in the preparation of ACs once the precursor has been selected.
Figure 2Illustrative figures to exemplify the influence of the experimental conditions used for chemical activation, namely activation temperature and chemical agent, on (A) the yield and (B) the surface area, using different chemical activating agents (and comparison with CO2 physical activation). (C) Range of temperatures used for the preparation of ACs by different chemical agents (and comparison with CO2 physical activation). The names in colors are relative to the physicochemical processes involved in the production of the lignocellulosic-derived ACs. Figure inspired from [9,11,17,18,19,22,23].
Figure 3Surface groups on a carbon surface. Figure inspired by [73,74,77].
Figure 4Evolution of the: (a) acidic and (b) basic oxygenated functional groups as the temperature of heat treatment increases for different series of activated carbons. Thermal treatments over an activated carbon prepared by chemical activation with KOH followed by ammonium peroxydisulfate oxidation, series 1 [96]; an oxidized commercial AC, series 2 [98]; an activated carbon prepared from olive stone by different acid treatments, series 3 [45]; an AC prepared using potassium-rich wine stone precursor, series 4 [91]; a commercial AC heat-treated and oxidized with two subsequent different treatments, series 5 [99]; and a carbon oxidized with nitric acid and ammonium peroxydisulfate, series 6 [100].
Figure 5Parameters that influence the mechanical strength of prepared activated carbons. Note that although only carbonization temperature is cited, the activation temperature and other experimental parameters affect such properties.